Disposed

A. Chandra Prakash, v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC15 Jul 2025WP/39851/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought mandamus against the appellate authority's failure to dispose of the stay petition in their statutory appeal against a chit fund arbitration award. The court disposed of the petition at admission stage, directing the authority to decide the appeal within three months after hearing parties, with interim stay of execution.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.2 directed to dispose of statutory appeal under Section 70 within three months after notice and hearing; execution proceedings stayed pending appeal; no costs.

A. Chandra Prakash, Vs State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰² ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY.THE FIFTEENTH DAY^{OF JULY} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICE K. SARATH}

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 39851 OF 2017

¶8

Between

¶9

1 A. Chandra Prakash, S/o^{Late A Chandraiah,aged about 36 years' Occ} Br.in".r, Rl/o Plot No.90^{and 91, H.No.13-3-982, Navodaya Nagar, Jiyaguda,} Hvderabad RJo^'l 3-4-576/312,^{Ganganagar'Hyderabad.}

¶10

2 iltiffi"p;;i."nl^{"s)"'i;1" A-Cniia..hah,-asedabout. i5 vears,occ} grsine6s, R/o Plot irlo.90 and 91, H.No.13-3-982, Navodaya Nagar, Jiyaguda, Hvderabad R/o¹ 3-4-576/3^I 2. Ganganagar,^Hyderabad. A.' Snantaramma, W/o Late^{A. -Chandraiah,aged about 61 years, Occ} Housewife , R/o 13-4-576/312,^{Ganganagar, Hyderabad}

¶11

...PETITIONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

State of Telangana,^{Rep by its Principal Secre{ary-Revenue, Secretariat,} Hyderabad.

¶14

Airoellate Authoritv. under the Chit^{FundAct-cum-Principal Secretary'} R'evenue Depa rtment, Telangana^{Secretariat, Hyderab-ad.}

¶15

Mis wlargaOirsi Chit Fund^{Frivte limited, having its Regd.-Office.and Corp} Otfice at"S-tO-t95, Fatehmaidan^{road, Opp Police Conttul Room, Hyderabad} ti"uing ,rong other branches, a^{branih at Secundqrrabad,Rep} ,by ^its Forerian/Branth [,4anager,^{Mr. Chirumamilla Sivalinga Prasad,} 9/o^Ch Raghavaiah, aged abou"t^{53 years, R/o H.No.49-128/3/4, KalpanaHousing} Society. Chintal. Hyderabad.

¶16

4 The Dy. Registrar, of Chits/Arbitrator,^{RedHills, Hyderabad.}

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of^{the constitution of lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High court may be} pleased to issue writ of mandamus or^{any otherappropriate writ or order or} direction declarrng the^{inactionof the RespondentNo.2 in taking up the Appeal} filed by the 4 Petitioners^{in disposingthe stay petitionfiled by the Petitionersin} the Appeal filed by the^{Petitioners against the award passed in ABR/CFNo.'1 273} of 2014 on the file of the lv^{Seniorcivil Judge, city civil court, Hyderabadas} arbitrary and illegal and^{consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to dispose of the}

¶19

stay petition filed by the petitioners in the Appeal againsr the award passed in ABR/cF No.127:l ot 2o14 on the file of the lV senior civir Judge, city civil court, Hyderabad

¶20

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO:49411 .OF 20171

¶21

'Petition under Section 151 cpc \aying that in the ci.cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cou 1 may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.p.No.207 of 201i.) rn Arbitration Award No.ABR/GF No.'1273 of 2o14 on the file of the lV senior livil Judge, city civil Court, Hyderabad pending disposal of the writ petition_

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. PRABHAKAR pERl

¶23

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1,2&4: AGp FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI p. DURGA PRASAD

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

i,c

¶26

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶27

WRIT PETITION No.3985 I of 2Ol7

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

Heard learned .orJ"t for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the official respondents. With their consent, this writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission.

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.p.No.64O 7 of 2O2S dated O4.03.2025 and requested to pass similar ordcr in this matter a_lso.

¶31

Learned Assistant Government pleader for Stamps and Registration has not disputed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶32

Recording the above said submission made by the learned counsel on either sicle and for the reasons alike in the order passed by this Court in W.p.No.64O 7 of 2025 dated 04.03 .2025, this Writ petition is disposed of dirccting

F-.t

{

SK, J wP 3(rn51 itol 7

¶38

the respondent No.2^{to consider the statutol:y appeal filed} by the petitioner under^{Section 70 of the Clhit FundAct,} 1982 against the Award^{in Case No.ABR/CF No'1273 of} 2Ol4 on the file^of tn" Deputv Registrar^of Chits/Arbitrators,^Redhills at Hvderabad, dated 21.Cr4.2016 and^{dispose of the same in ar:cordance} with law within a^{period of three months fr'>m ttre date of} receipt of zr copy of this^{order by duly puttin5r all tl-ie parties} concerned on notice and^{affording an r)pportunity of} personal hearing to them. Pending^{disposal of the eLppeal} there shall be stay^{of all furtherproceedings'in Ii'P'No'207} of 2016 in Arbitration^{Award No.ABR/CFNo'1273 of 2Ol4} on the fil: of the^{IV Senior Civil Judge, C:ty CLvil Court,} Hyderabad.

¶39

Miscellaneous Petitions,^{if any, penclingin this writ}

¶40

petition shall stand^{closed.There sha-tl be no order as to}

costs.

To,

The Prirrcipal^{Secretary-Revenue'Secretarial T S"F'vderahad'} 2. The^{AppellatenutnontyL'ni;;t"h; Chii i'"d, Act-cun Princir'al Secretary'} iffii"t{t*-i'iffiHd-ttrflttT,"{,1ffi^{u+i,,t':shc,u^r.r,he}

¶46

One CC to SRi. P. UURGA PRASAD, Advocare tOpUCl 7. Two CD Copies BN/ oG JP \

HIGH COURT

DATED:1510712025

<br>'-:.
-/.-1 i1a. s l,\ r[ -q
/3 "'
i
t
'16 'iEP in25
::'
Y1

¶52

ORDER

¶53

WP.No.39851 of 2017

¶54

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶55

A. Chandra Prakash, v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A. Chandra Prakash, v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Deepak Paspunatla, Vs Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue

Raparthi Somaiah, Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Pedasanaganti Satyanarayana Vs The State of Telangana

Masagani Raghu Ramaiah Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Teijeen Jaysree Vs The State of Telangana

Neerla Murali Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others