Dismissed¶27

S.A. Khalid, Hyd v. Prl Secy, Revenue Dept, Hyd and 6 Ot

Telangana HC6 Oct 2025WP/9320/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Infructuous dismissal; Article 226 mandamus; Telangana High Court at Hyderabad; Justice K. Sarath; W.P. No. 9320 of 2014; decided 06-10-2025; AP Record in Land and Pattedar Passbook Act, 1971; RDO Chevella File No. C/3245/2006 dated 03-05-2007; Tahsildar Shamshabad Proceedings C/4391/2005 dated 07-02-2006 and C/165/2006 dated 04-03-2006; KB Doddi village; Survey Nos. 23 and 24lAA; total Acres 2-12 gts; cause does not survive; dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs; Miscellaneous Petitions pending in the petition, if any, stand closed. ¶27

S.A. Khalid, Hyd Vs Prl Secy, Revenue Dept, Hyd… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰² ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 9320 0F 2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

9.A.Khalid,^{S/o M.A. Ghani, Agedabout} 44^years, Occ Business, R/o H.No. 1 7-2-354, Kurmaguda Saidabad, Hyderabad.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

? I|'"^{Collector,Ranga Re_dlV DistricaKhairatabad, Hyderabad.}

¶13

The Revenue Diviosnal Officer Western Division, Ctievella at Aftapur, Rangareddy District.

¶14

!^{fhe Tahsildar, Shamshabad Mandal At Shamshabad} Rangareddy District. 5. Mohd. Yousuf, S/o Ahmed Ali, Aged about 64 years, Occ Agricultlre Fl/o KB Doddi, Vittage Shamshabad, Shamshabad Mahdal. RanoaEddv Districr.

¶15

Mohd. Saleem Khan, Sio Mohd. Salam Khan Aged abou-t 48 ye'ars, Occ Business Rlio H.No.t9-2-81/36, C, Tadbund KaZapadi, Hyderbbad.

¶16

Smt. Mahmooda Begum, W/o Late Ahmed^yar Klian Aqed about 53 vears Occ Housewife Ryo tt.No.t9-+-385/4, Bahadurpura HyjeraO;d.^--'---'

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned proceedings passed by the 3rd respondent in File No. cl3245l2oo6 dated 3-5-2007 by setting aside the proceeding No.c/4391/2005 and C116512O06, dated 7-2-2006 and 3-4-2006 passed by the 4th respondent with regard to the petitioners land i.e., agricultural land bearing Survey No.23, to the extent of Acres 1-26 gts and survey No.24lAA to the extent of Acres 0-26 gts. Total admeasuring Acres 2-12 gts. Situated at KB Doddi village and Gram Panchayat, Shamshabad Mandal, Rangareddy District, as bad, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, without jurisdiction, violation of principles of natural justice and the provisions of the AP Record in Land and Pattedar passbook Act, j971.

¶19

t.A. NO: 1 0F 20'r4(WPMP. NO: 11683 OF 2014)

¶20

Petition urder Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in .the^{affidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay the} impugned procet:dings passed by the 3rd respondent in File No. Ct324St2OO6 dated 3-5-2007 t,y setting aside the proceeding No.c/439i12005 and c/i65/2006, daled 7-2-2006 and 34-2006 passed by the 4th respondent with regard to the petitione/s land i.e., agricultural land bearing survey No.23, to the extent of Acres 1-26 gts and Survey No.24lAA to the extent of Acres 0-26 gts. Total admeasuring Acres 2-12 gts. Ilituated at KB Doddi Village and Gram panchayat, Shamshabad Mandal; Rangareddy District, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt SURESH SHIV SAGAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.s TO 7: --

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^K.SARATH

¶24

WRIT PETITION^{No.932Oof 2OL4}

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Learned Counsel appearing^{for the petitioner} submits that^{no further orders are necessary in this} matter and the^{cause in the Writ Petition does not} survive and thereby,^{the Writ Petition has become} infructuous.

¶27

2 Recording the aforementioned^{submission,the} Writ Petition is dismissecl^{as infructuous'There sha]l} be no order as to^costs.

¶28

3 As sequel to it,^{MiscellaneousPetitions, if any}

¶29

pending in this petition, shali^standclosed'

¶30

^1?'5r'jii1"$",il5"#

¶31

//TRUE^COPY//

¶32

SECTION^OFFICER