A writ petition seeking mandamus against dismissal of a revenue appeal remained pending since 2012. With no representation by the petitioner on successive hearings, the High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 7869 OF 2012
Between:
Uppari Krishnaiah, S/o late Ethirajam, Aged about 50 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o Polikepahad Village, Gopalpet Mandal, Mahaboobnaga, O,ll[E,r,O"=*
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or directron more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.'1 in dismissing the Appeal bearing No. F2llA-03/2002, dated 02.08.2008 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequentially set aside the impugned order of respondent No.1 in Appeal No.F2llA-03/2002.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2012(WP MP. NO :99 72 0F 20121
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the respondents No.2 to 10 from alienating the agricultural lands in Survey Nos. 95 and 96 to an extent ot Ac.2-24 guntas situated at Polikepahad Village, Gopalpet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, pending disposal of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.SHIV SHANKER (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 TO 10: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
,-
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.7869 of 2OL2
ORDER:
This petition is coming for hearing since 2OL2. On O8.O9.2O25, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behatf of the petitioner, and therefore the matter was directed to be listed toda.y under the caption "For Dismissa,l". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this case.
SD/. A. SRINIVASREDOY ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To'" 1. On" CC to SRI V.SHIV SHANKER' Adv,ocate.[OPUCI 2 Two ccsto Gp FoR ftivEi{utt, iii's'; coriirbl.the dtate of relansana, at Hvderabad. IOUTI
3 Triro CD CoPies
PSK. M a
HIGH COURT
DATED:0611012025
ORDER
WP.No.7869 of 2012
1 nE Sl'A
()
.J
? I JAt.| 2026
fi
71
*
.,/
i2f ir t'- l./
I
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION/ DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
9g
Uppari Krishnaiah
The Joint Collector, Mahaboobnagar District
Singotam
Gopal
Thirupathaiah
Srinivasulu
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
