K.Mahipal Reddy v. State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous dismissal of writ petition and contempt case; writ of mandamus under Article 226; police interference in civil property dispute; Plot No. 21 Sy No. 620 Amberpet Kalan Village Hayathnagar; interim directions under Section 151 CPC in W.P.M.P.No.1101 of 2016 dt. 07.01.2016; contempt of courts Act 1971 sections 10 to 12; parties: K. Mahipal Reddy, State of Telangana, Station House Officer P.S. Hayathnagar, Sri Bhaskar Goud (ACP Vanasthalipuram), Sri M. Rajamalla Reddy (SI), Smt Bollapalli Vijayalakshmi, Shri Venkateswarlu (CI); counsel: Ms. Nitya Sri Balla / Sri N. Sridhar Reddy, GP for Home, Sri Chindam Anjaneyulu; bench: Justice N. Tukaramji; Telangana High Court, 06-11-2025.
What did the court decide?
Having regard to the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in both matters had become infructuous, the Court dismissed the writ petition (W.P.No.913 of 2016) and the contempt case (C.C.No.259 of 2016) as infructuous, made no order as to costs, and closed the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any. No point in the underlying dispute was adjudicated.