Writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 586/2016; the offences were compounded before the Lok Adalat during pendency, so nothing survived for adjudication and the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13217 |
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION NO: 41295 OF 20'16
Between:
.....PETITIONERS
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a suitable writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to FIR 586/2016 on
the file of the P.S. Pet Basheerabad, R.R. District, the 2nd lr ,rein and quash the same
I.ANO:2 OF 2016(WPMP.NO:50891 OF 2016)
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cour: may be pleased to direct 2nd Respondent not arrest the petitioners pending disp, sal of the main writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI S.A.V.RATNAM
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : -
The Court made the following ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION No.41295OF 2016
ORDER:
This Writ Petition ishled under Article 226 of Constitution
of lndia seekingthe followingrelief/s:-
"...lssue a suitablewrit orderor directionmore particularly one in the nature of Wnt ofCertiorari caltingfor the records pertaining to FIR 586/2016 onthe file ofthe PSPet Basheerabad, R-R. District,the 2'd herein and quash the same and pass..."
7
5 I have perusedthe material availableon recorc
7 Accordingty, this WritPetition is dismisserle s infructuous' There shall beno order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions,pending if any, sha I stand closed
SD/- SRI: . SRINIVASA REDDY ASS ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ,.'-. (:,
To
SECTION OFFICER
1 f.woCCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State )Tetangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 2 One CC to SRt S.A.V.RATNAM, Advocate [OpUC] 3 Two CD Copies SA BM
HIGH COURT
DATED:0411112025
iiS
€
,4{"'
,ar€
o
()
t ll ( :r,a 2026 Cte
t
:ir 1
y,9)
ORDER
WP.No.41295 of 2016
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
t'-ff.i**
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No. 586/2016 registered at P.S. Pet Basheerabad could be quashed given that the parties compounded the offences before the Lok Adalat during the petition's pendency.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri. Sanjay Angotri
Sri. Prakash Angotri
Smt. Sunanda Angotri
Sheetal Dinesh Dubey
Dinesh Bidinarayan Dubey
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department
N.Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
