Disposed

ChidhireVeerabhadraiah v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC24 Jun 2025WP/8767/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought recall of an order dated 23-02-2022 passed in their writ petition, arguing the matter was inadvertently treated under a common order in WP No. 32 of 2022 and batch. The court recalled that order and directed the Registry to post the matter for admission before the court holding the revenue roster.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 23.02.2022 recalled; matter directed to be posted 'for admission' before the concerned Court having revenue roster.

ChidhireVeerabhadraiah Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

FRIDAY ,THE^{EIGHTH DAY OF JULY} TWO THOUSAND^{ANDTWENTY TWO}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSENREDDY}

¶5

IA NO: 20F²⁰²²

¶6

¶7

WRIT PETI TION^{NO:8767 0F 2022}

¶8

Between:

¶9

ChidhireVeerabhadraiah,^{S/o Ch' VeeraiahAoed about 49 Years'occ-} Business, nyo^{f-r.r.ro."ii-i-+lT,nInlman femple,ialapet,secunderabad}

¶10

2, BommanaBoina^{Deepesh Yadav,S/o} -late^B, .Ganesh^{Yadav Aged^37 years,} occ- Business,^{Fy5""H.N; "'i-e-irB'- sr.o cross Lane' P GRoad'} Secunderabad

¶11

.PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

The State The State State^{of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secreta,ry' Revenue}

¶14

The State The State State ' Si;.p;;.d negistlaiion odpartment' S'ecretariat' Hyderabad'

¶15

The Commissioner,^{and lnspector General of Registration and Stamps} Mozamjahi^{tvlarket,Jam Bagh, Hyderabao}

¶16

The District^{Registrar, Hyderabad'}

¶17

The Sub Registrar,^{Kawadiguda'secunderabad}

¶18

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶19

PetitionunderSectionlslcPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin theaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedtolist thematterunderthecaptionforbeingmentiontorecalltheorderdated 23-02-2022^{passedin WP No. 8767of 2022'}

¶20

This^petition coming^{on for hearing, uponperusingthe petition and the} affidavit filed^{in supportthereof and upon hearingthe argumentsof Sri N' Krishna} Sumanth, Counsel^{for the petitionerand GP for Revenue on behalf of} Respondents,^{the court made the following: ORDER}

¶21

Thelearnedcounselforpetitionerssubmitsthatinadvertentlyorder dated 23.2,2022^{was passedin the writ petition as the instant matter is not} coveredbythecommonorderpassedinWP.No.32Eol2022andbatch.

¶22

Therefore, the^{orderdated 23.2.2022is recalled'}

¶23

Registry is directed to^{post the matter under the caption "for} admission" before^{the concerned Court having roster'}

¶24

SD/.T.SRINIVAS DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (,lt'

¶25

SECTION OFFICER

¶26

To,

¶27

,1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Stamps and Registration Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat'^Hyderabad.

¶28

2'TheCommissioner,andlnspectorGeneralofRegistrationandStamps Mozamjahi Market,^{JamBagh, Hyderabad}

¶29

The District Registrar,^Hyderabad.

¶30

The Sub Registrar,^{Kawadiguda,Secunderabad}

¶31

S. fnJS"iiion 6fficer,^{Writ No-n ServiceSection, High Court for the Stateof} Telangana

¶32

o. fndS"ition Officer,^{WritPostingSection, High Court for the Stateof} Telangana7^-O;; CC to Sri N. Krishna^{Sumanth,Advocate} [OPUC]

¶33

b. f*JCCi to Ci for^{Rer"nue, Hi6h CourtfoitheState of Telangana. [OUT]} 9. Two CD CoPies

'10.One SPare CoPY

PM BS ./ TJ

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0810712022

NOTE:

POST THE WP 'FOR^ADMISSION' BEFORE THE COURT^HAVING .REVENUE'ROSTER

¶40

g STAr6
1 o
(
't
f,
JuL ?u2
1 1
,
l
D PA

ORDER

I.A.No.2 OF 2022 IN

WP.No.8767 of 2022

Ordering the l.A.No.2 of 2022 &

¶45

Restoring the Writ Petition to file

ChidhireVeerabhadraiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

ChidhireVeerabhadraiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.S. Shashidhar Vs State of Telangana

Nivee Properties Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary

M/s.Laurel Private Industrial Training Institute, Vs The Union of India

Bonila Paul Chitharanjan Vs State of Telangana

Pylla Jyothi Vs State of Telangana and 4 Others

P.Sundari Vs State of Telangana