Dismissed¶27

Syed Mohd. Imran v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC14 Aug 2025WP/8167/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court WP 8167/2019; Justice K. Sarath; decided 14-08-2025; writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs; cause does not survive; Article 226 mandamus; S.151 CPC stay application; impugned order Case No.8/272012018 dated 23-01-2019 of 3rd Respondent (RDO & SDM Secunderabad Division); File No.B/272012018; petitioner Syed Mohd. Imran; respondents State of Telangana, District Collector Hyderabad, Saleemunnisa Begum; pending miscellaneous petitions closed; no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and no further orders are required, the Court dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs. ¶27

Syed Mohd. Imran Vs State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

t^3302l

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 8167 OF 2019

¶7

Between:

¶8

Syed l\4ohd. lmran, S/o. Syed Mohd. Muqeen Muslim, Aged about 45 years R/o. H.No.8-3-2281 1 1991 A, Rahmat Nagar Yousufguda, Hyderabad

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶12

The District Collector, Hyderabad

¶13

The Revenue Divisional Officer and Sub-DivisionaltVagistrate, Secunderabad Division, Hyderabad District

¶14

Saleemunnisa Begum, W/o- Syed Mohd. lvluqeen Muslim, Aged about 79 years Ri./o. H.No.B-3-228l1 199/A, Rahmat Nagar Yousufguda, Hyderabad

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ. of [Mandamus declaring the Order of the 3rd Respondent in Case No.8/272012018 dated 23-01-2019 as illegal, null, void and arbitrary lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in File No.B/272012018 dated 23-01-2019 pending on the file of the 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition

¶18

IANo: 20F 2019

¶19

petition under Sec extend n the a the ff da interim v r,,,"o,n .,:'ooJn'; order fJffi::::^l il l: ;ffI.J: ;;: :1": passed in v P.No.816 7 or 201e, pendins disposar or tne predsltritdrJj;l-.r-

¶20

Counsel for the petitioner: SRt K. DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: Gp FOR REVEN..: ! Counsel for the Respondent No.4:_

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶23

SrRIT'PETITION No.8167 of 2Ol9

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and no further orders are required to be passed in this matter, thereby, the Writ Petition has become infructuous

¶26