Samala Aruna, Vs The State of Telangana

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the.part of Respondents in mutating the name of the Petitioner in the Revenue Records and issuing of Pattadar Passbooks in favour of the Petitioner in respect of all that Agricultural land admeasuring Ac.O-l5guntas in Sy.No.B, Ac.1-00 guntas in Sy.No.11, Ac.O05 guntas in Sy.No.'12 and Ac.1-00 guntas in Sy.No.44, total extent ot Ac.2-2O guntas situated at Village Narsapuram, Mandal Venkatapur, Mulugu (erstwhile Warangal) District, in pursuance to Petitioner Application No. ROS022003651029/Transaction lD TTROS022003651029 dated 07.11.2020 based on Sadabainama' dated 10.12.201 1 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, contrary to

¶16

Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar^pass Books Act, 2020, violative of the Principle of Natural Justice and violative of Article 14, 1s (1) (g) and 300-4 of the Constitution of lnd ia.

¶17

l.A.NO:1 OF 2025

¶18

Petition Under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may bd pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the petitioner Application No. Ros022003651029/Transaction tD TTRos022oo36s1029 dated 07.11.2020 based on Sadabainama dated 10.12.20'1 1 and carryout the mutation of the Revenue Records and issue Pattadar^passbooks in favour of the petitioner in respect of all that Agricultural land admeasuring Ac.0-lsguntas in Sy.No.B, Ac.100 guntas in Sy.No.'1 1, Ac.O-05 guntas in Sy.No..l2 and Ac.1-00 guntas in Sy.No.44, total extent ol Ac.2-2o guntas situated at Village Narsapuram, I\rlandal venkatapur, Mulugu (erstwhile warangal) District in favour of the petitioner, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI S.LAKSHMI KANTH

¶20

Counsel forthe Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE

¶21

The Court made the following ORDER

¶22

ri

¶23

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY

¶24

WRIT PETITION No.7758 of 2O25

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of

¶27

India, is filed see king the following reliel

¶28

"... to issue an appropriote Writ Order or Drection more panliculadg one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaing th.e inaction on the part of Respondents tn mutctting tle name of the Petitioner in the Reuenue Records and. issuing of Pattadar Passbooks in fauour of the Petitioner in respect of alL that Agricultural land admeasuing Ac.0-15 gunta-s in Sg.No.8, Ac.1-OO guntas in Sg.No.11, Ac.0-05 guntas in Sg.No.12 and Ac.1 O0 gutttas irt Sg.No.44, totaL erte of Ac.2 20 guntas situoted at ViLLage, Narsapurant Mandal, Venkatopur, Mutugu (ersttuhile Warangal) Distict, in pursuance to Petitioner Applicatio n No. RO 502 2 0O 3 65 1 02 9 / Transaction 1D.TTRO5022003651029 dated 07.11.2020 ba.sed on 'Sadabainama' dated 10.12.201 1 as arbitrary, itlegal, unjust, contrary to Telangana Rights in Laru1. and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2020, uiolattue of the Principle of Natural Justice and uiolatiue of Atticle la, 19, (1)(g) and 300 A of the Constitution of India..'

¶29

Considered the submissions of learned counsel for the

¶30

respective parties and pemsed the record.

¶31

The case of the petitioner is that she is the owner and possessor of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.o-15 gts in Sy.No.B, Ac.1-00 gts in Sy.No. 11, Ac.0-05 gts in Sy.No.12 and Ac.1-O0 gts in Sy.No.44, total admeasuring Ac.2-2O gts situated at Narsapuram Village, Venkatapur Mandal, Mulugu (erstwhiie Warangal) District, having acquired the same under Sadabainama (unregistered sale deed) dated 1O.I2.2Oll.It is further case of the petitioner that she submitted application vide No.ROSO22003651029 dated

¶32

.1

¶33

2

¶34

07 .ll.2O2O, seeking regularization^{of Sadabainama and mutation of} the subject lands in her name and also to^{issue Pattadar} Passbooks. The grievance of^{the petitioneris that, evenafter receipt} of the said application, till^{date, no action has beentaken by the} respondent aul horities. Hence the^{WritPetition.}

¶35

The learned Assistant Government^Pleader for^Revenue appearing for rcspondents^{has submitted that TelanganaRights in} Lancl and Pattadar Passbooks Act,^{2O2O(for short "the Act 9 of} 202O") has been repealed and^{replacedwith Telangana Bhu Bharati} (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 (for short "the^Act I^{of 2025"1} and if the petitioner submits online application in^{the prescribed} format in Bhu Bharati Web Portal and if^{the same fulhlls all the} requirements of the Act I of 2025 and^{the Rules made thereunder,} the respondent authorities will consider^{the same, in accordance} with law.

¶36

In view of the above submissions, this Court^{deems it} appropriate to dispose of this writ^{petition permitting the petitioner} to make appropriate online application in the^{prescribed format in} Bhu Bharati Web Portal, seeking regularization of sadabaianama, mutation of her name in revenue records and for issuance of pattadar passbooks in respect of subject lands. In the event of such application being made by the petitioner arrd if the same fulhlls ali

¶37

:

¶38

J

¶39

the requirements under^{the provisions of the Act I of 2025 and the} Rules made thereunder,^{the respondent-authoritiesshall examine} and consider the^{case of the petitioner.In any event, ifthe} apptication of the^{petitioner does not fulfill the requirements} .of^the Act 1 of 2025 and the^{Rules made thereunder, the respondent-} authorities shall^{pass a reasonedorder, in accordance with law and} communicate the^{same to the petitioner.The entireexercise shall} be completed within^{a period of three (03) months from the date of} receipt of the application.

¶40