Dismissed

Sri S. Ashok Kumar Goud, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Apr 2025WP/12234/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought certified copies of old court files and challenged a memo refusing them under the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhniyam, 2023. Counsel sought leave to withdraw; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Sri S. Ashok Kumar Goud, Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

32e6l

¶2

Ar HYDERABAD

¶3

rN rHE^{HrcH couRr} [."#Jl,t ?[tJi 3i.l5i;t:FiNA

¶4

^ot"'

¶5

w ED NESDAY i.{H,="Hs XL!'f, 'P-?+I

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE C'V' BHASKARREDDY}

¶8

N NO:^{12234 0F2025} wRlTPE

¶9

Between: 1. Sri^{S. Ashok Kumar Goud' S/o Late Malliah' Aged about 58 yrs' Occ'} , ::'':'':[nivas^{Goud' s/o S Ashok KumarGoud' Ased about 37 vrs' occ'}

¶10

':l;,fi1$.tffi ffij*;:l"r*it"FlgE:,Y'$::"'rHrj':'"'ri'?3i

¶11

Sri Raiu^{Goud' S/o S V"ai"nGotd' Aged about 37 yrs' Occ Private Service'}

¶12

Sri^{Anand couo, Slo i'YadiahGoud'Aged about 33 yrs' Occ Private}

¶13

2-52'^Dar sah^{H ussa i n s hawa.i' ViIIage'} i=ilirut* r:tf^t "t:,,1'.^#s,s,Ii fl^{jt'lffi J"-:iX8zfl ".f "fdi8:ff '":"h["ffi ["%''::'#^Ai":Ariilii'{} Shareef,^{Ased about o;z Vit''6Ji "6""it'F/o H No 10-3-274111N1'} Hr;;tJ"^{Nisar,HYderabad'}

¶14

...PETITIONERS

¶15

AND

¶16

1 The State of^{Telangana, through its RevenueSecretary' Revenue Department} n r",ⁱ i's"o ffid"^{riJ.S. sicretariat,H vd e ra ba d'}

¶17

2 The Revenue^{Divisional Officer,Rajendranagar} ,Division^{Having of{ice at 51'} r l"il'hi""g'Hol^{Sii- niri. d-#i R;;b"sh tolo nv' Hvderabad' Telansana} 500030

¶18

3 TheDivisionalAdministrativeofficer'Ra'iendranagarDivisionHavingofficeat si', r"'"ljini"l iil.^{S;ii{ill"co-ronv. n"bash colonv' Hvderabad' relansana} 500030

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under^{Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiled therewith,the High Couft maybe} pleased to pass an order direction or a writ^{particularly in the nature of Writ of}

¶21

Mandamus thereby decraring the Memo No. Rt(33/2025 dated 27-03-2025 issued by the Respondent No 2 and 3 thereby expressing inabirity to issue certified copies ordie requested fire bearing c.c. No. w1751t1975,C.C. No. wt752t1975, CC No WW Tfit1gZS, and C.C. No. W389/t97a traceabre is highrv i,esar, arbitrary and in vioratio.;il"",li [Hi";::il: sakshya Adhniyam, 2023. consequenry this Honourabre court may be preased to direct' the Respondent No.2 and 3 to furnish certified copies of comprete ceiring files in C.C. No. WZ5111925, C.C. No. W.752 197S_ C.C. No. W753l1975, and C.C. No. W389/.1975 as requested by the petitioner in the representation dated 2g.O2.2L2|under Section 75 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhniyam, 2023.

¶22

IA NO:1OF 2025

¶23

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to pass an interim direction thereby suspending the Memo No. Rr(33/2025 dated 27-032025 issued by the Respondent No.2 and 3 pending disposar of the writ petition.

¶24

Counsel for the petitioner : SRI MOHAMMAD ADNAN

¶25

Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶26

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶27

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR R.EDDY

¶28

WRIT PETITION No.12234 of 2o25

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this

¶31

Court to withdraw the instant writ^petition.

¶32

Permission is accorded.

¶33

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶34

No order as to costs.

¶35

As a sequel, the miscellaneous^{petitionspending,} if any,

¶36

shall stand closed.

¶37

SD/-K.BHAVANI^SWAMY S ISTANT^REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION^OFFICER

To,

One CC^{to SRI MOHAMMAD ADNAN,Advocate'[OPUC]}

¶42

f wo CCs^{to GP FORREVENUE, High Courtfor the State of Telangana} lourl

¶43

Two CD CoPies

@::I
--<br>

HIGH COURT

DATED:2310412025

ORDER

1H6-
(o
I 206
{
r(:

WP.No.12234 ot 2025

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶51

Sri S. Ashok Kumar Goud, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri S. Ashok Kumar Goud, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. G.Vimalamma Vs The State of Telangana

Nelli Rajaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Manguluri Kanakaraju Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Gudla Aravinda Vs The State of Telangana

K.Maldhakal Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Domakonda Devalaxmi Vs The State of Telangana