Mir Mohammed Ali, Vs The Government of Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

Mir Mohammed Ali, Vs The Government of Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

t³³⁰² l

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Originat Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

Between:

WRIT PETITIO NN0:7520 OF 2012

Mir Mohammed Ali,, S/o. Mir Zahed Ali, Business R/o. H.No 9-69/4, Khan Colony, Bharpet Village, parigr Mandat, nungi R"ddybirtri"t

AND

...PETITIONER

1 -- The Government of Andhra prades.!,, Rep by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department. Secretariat. Hrdei;b;6

2 Ihe Joint collector,. Ranoa Reddy District, Having its office at Lakadikapoor, Hyderabad

3 The Revenue Divisional Officer,., Chevella Division, Ranga Reddy Drstrict,

Having its Office at Attapur, Hyderabad

1. The Tahsildar,, Parigi tviandar.'Ranga Reddy Diskict, Having its office at Parigi, Ranoa Reddv District

6 py9^!!9lquOOin, Slo Syed Faisuddin, Civit Contracro r, Rto 24-20, Nryamarhnagar,^parigi Village and lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District

Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of tndia Orriffil:i',fTl: circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed therewith, the \igh Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or writs, order or orders calling the records pertaining to the orders dared 16.11.20.,l 1 in case No. D11365412010 of the respondent No.2 whrch is in consequent to orders dated 21 .04.2010 in proceedings No Cl3O2Bt2OOg of respondent No 3 and consequently to set-aside the same

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2012(WPMP. N O: 9513 OF 20121

Petition under Section 151 cpc prayinf that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petrtion, the High court may be pleased to suspend the orders dated 16 11 .2011 in case No. D11365412010 of the

respondent No.2 which is in consequent to orders daled 21 .O4.20 1 0 in proceedings No Cl3028l20og of respondent No 3 pending disposal of the Writ Petition

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(wvMP. NO: 3412 OF 20121

Between:

iy-"^1l:lll9!in.*Srg^{p.119d Farsuddin, Civit Conrracrc r Rto 24_20,} Nryamatnnagar,^parigi Village and Mandal, Ranga Retldy District

AND

.PETITI ONER/RESPONOENT NO.5

'I . Mir t/ohammed Ali,,, S/o. Mir Zahed Ali. Business R,o H No 9-69/4. Khan Cotony, Bharpet Viilage.^parigi Mandit. Cangi n.Oiy :istrici'"

e n

2 r he Gove rn ment orl nl ! g,? !,r 9..1 F"; "5; i3 E?IJI []isll,.!l] ferrrtor Revenue [)epartment, Secretariat. HvOerSOjd

The Joint corector,, Ranga Reddy oistiici, Hiving its (xfice at Lakadikapoor, Hyderabad.

The Revenue Divisional Officer,, Chevella Division, Ra.ga Reddy District, Having its^(fffice at Attapur. HvderanjJ^{- -' -}

The Tahsildar..^{parigi_Mandal.'Ranga} Reddy District. .---' "' H rvrng its Office at Parigi, Ranga Reddi District

.RESPOt\IDENTS/RESPONOENTYS

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed n support of the petition, the High court n ay be preased vacate the interim orders passed in in Wp No 7520 of 2012 dated 23 04 2012 in the interest of^justice

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RESU MAHENDER REDDY

Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: Gp FOR REVENUE

Counsel for Respondent No. S: SRI M. A. BASITH

The Court made the following: ORDER

-/

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.752O OF 2OL2 ORDER:

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned Counsei for petitioner would submit that the cause in the^present Writ Petition does not survive and thereby the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the aforementioned submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if

zrny, shall stand closed

I D/-R. PONNA KRISHNA s TANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPYII

ECTION OFFICER

To, 1 One CC to Sri Resu lVlahender Reddy Advocate [OpUC] 2 Two CCs to GP For Revenue ,High C_ou rt for the State of Telangana lourl 3 One CC to Sri M A Bdsith Advocate [OPUC] 4 Two CD Copies MBC BS

HIGH COURT

DATED: 22108t2025

r-',

ORDER

WP.Nc.7520 of 2012

,ltr.

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WIT}IOUT COSTS