Dismissed¶24

Smt. Bairu Ramadevi v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Aug 2025WP/33600/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed as withdrawn; no merits adjudication. Keywords: withdrawal of writ petition; Article 226 mandamus; Sub-Registrar Narapally; refusal to register General Power of Attorney; M/s Guntas Realty; Survey No. 17 Parvathapur Village Medipally Mandal Medchal-Malkajgiri; Refusal Order No. 3512024 dated 22-10-2024; layout approval / LRS / classification restrictions; Stamps and Registration; State of Telangana; I.A. No. 1 of 2024 Section 151 CPC; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; Telangana High Court; Justice K. Sarath; decision dated 22-08-2025. No precedents cited; no monetary quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs and miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed. ¶24

Smt. Bairu Ramadevi Vs State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs and miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed.

¶24

Issue for consideration

Whether the Refusal Order No. 3512024 dated 22-10-2024 passed by Respondent No. 3 declining to register the petitioner's General Power of Attorney in favour of M/s Guntas Realty, imposing conditions such as layout approval, LRS orders and classification restrictions, was illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 300A of the Constitution of India. (Raised in the petition but not adjudicated, as the petition was withdrawn.)

¶15

Ratio / Principle

Permission is granted to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition, and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶24

Key takeaways

There shall be no order as to costs.ratio¶25
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.ratio¶27

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition No. 33600 of 2024 (High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, Special Original Jurisdiction; K. Sarath, J.; decided 22-08-2025): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Smt. Bairu Ramadevi challenging Refusal Order No. 3512024 dated 22-10-2024 of the Sub-Registrar, Narapally (Respondent No. 3) declining to register a General Power of Attorney executed by her in favour of M/s Guntas Realty in respect of Survey No. 17 (4840 sq. yds.), Parvathapur Village, Medipally Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, alleging illegality, arbitrariness and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 300A; an interlocutory application (I.A. No. 1 of 2024 under Section 151 CPC) sought a direction to receive and process the GPA pending disposal. Before any adjudication on merits, counsel Sri N. Ravi Prasad filed a letter dated 18.08.2025 seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition; permission was granted and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, were directed to stand closed. No ruling was made on the validity of the refusal order.

¶1

[³³⁰² ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 33600 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt. Bairu Ramadevi, W/o Bairu Ramulu, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Business R/o H.No. 8-20, Chowdary Nagar, Neredmet, K.V. Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

The Commissioner and lnspector General of Registration and Stamps, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶13

3 The Sub-Registrar, Narapally, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana.

¶14

,..RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more so particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent No. 3 in passing the Refusal Order No. 3512024 as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural^justice and violation of Article 14, 16 and 300,4 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the Refusal order No. 3512024. daled 22-10-2O24 by directing the respondent No. 3 to register the General Power of Attorney executed by the Petitioner in favor of M/s Guntas Realty, without imposing irrelevant conditions such as layout approval, LRS orders, or classification restrictions.

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent to receive the General Power of Attorney submitted by the Petitioner in respect of Survey No. 17, admeasuring 4840 sq. yds., situated at Parvathapur Village and Gram Panchayat, Medipally Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana and process the same, pending disposal of the writ petition-

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI N.RAVI PRASAD

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶21

WRIT PETITION No. 336O0 of 2024

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

Sri N. Ravi Prasad, Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner filed a letter dated 18.08.2025 in the Registry, seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.

¶24