Panaganti Kausalya Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others

Panaganti Kirusalya, Wo Late Srinivas Reddy, aged about 77-years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H.No. 1-7-20, JSN Colony, Streef No.8, Habsiguda beside Legend Apartments, Uppal, Medchal Diskict, Hyderabad, TS.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad

¶13

The District Collector, Suryapet, Suryapet Dist.

¶14

The Tahsildar cum Joint Sub Registrar, Nagaram Mandal, Suryapet Diskict

¶15

Sri Mandadi Buchi Reddy, s/o Late Venkat Reddy, aged about 67 years, Occ. Private employee, R/o H.No. 1S2,Street No.4, Venkatadri Township. Phase l. Chowdaryguda village. Ghatkesar Mandal..Medchal District. TS.

¶16

Basha Karla Ravinder, s/o Sataiah. aged about 48 years, Occ. Agriculture. r/o Phanagiri village, Nagaram Mandal. Suryapet Diskict, TS.

¶17

Basha Karla Venkateshwarlu, s/o Sataiah, aged about 45 years. Occ. Agriculture. r/o Phanagiri village, Nagaram Mandal. Suryapet District, TS.

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.2 herein in not initiate any action upon my on line applications LM No.2100108786 and another LM No.2100108787 dated 31-12-2021 filed in accordance with the orders of this Honble Court vide in W.P.No. 6228 of 2020 dated 03-12-2021, for correction wrong e_ntries in the Dharani Portal and as well as connected revenue in Sy.No. 200 to an extent of agricultural land Ac.2-00 guntas out of Ac. 06-35

¶20

guntas situated at Phanagiri Village, Nagaram Mandal Suryapet Districti and issued Digital Pass Books in respect of the above s.: irl land in favour^of the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 is illegal and cons€'q uently direct the respondent No.2 herein to set aside the illegal pattas rlltained by the un official respondent Nos.5 and 6 colluded with the resSrondent No.3 herein and restore the name of the petitioner herein in^place of her late husband as per the registered sale deed document No.825/19i 7 dated^{17 -08-1977} executed by the respondent No.4 herein in favour of 'he husband of the petitioner before the SRO Suryapet forthwith.

¶21

Prayer amended as per C.O.dt.26.08.2025 in lA No.1/202^j.

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{rrcurnstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High CoL 1 may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 , 2, 3 to maintain Status quo^:c 'finalize the online application made by the Petitioner vide LM No. 210010878r ilnd another LM No. 2100108787 dated 31 .12.2021, pending disposal of the mai',^'/Vrit Petition.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KODIPELLI SRIDHAR

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: SRI H.RAKESH KU^i/lAR, AGP, REP. FOR GP FOR REV[:NUE

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No.S & 6: Ms. URMILA, REP. l: CIR SRI CHALAKANI VT:NKAT YADAV

¶27

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{E.V.VENUGOPAL}

¶29

WRIT PETITION No.738^{OF 2022}

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

This Writ Petition is filed^{under Article226 of Constitution}

¶32

of India seeking the following^relief/s:-

¶33

"... to^pass an^{order or direction more particularlyone in the nature} of Wrii of Mandamus^{to declarethe action of the Respondent No'2,} upon my online application^{LMNo.2100108786andanotherLM} Nt.ZrooioSzez dated 31.12.2021^{filed in accordancewith the orders} of this Hon'ble Court^{vide in w.P.No.6228} l2O2O^{d'ated03.12'2021} but the Respondent No.1^{not providing the landgrievance logins to} the Respondent No.2^{to finalizethe Iand gricvance matters is illegal,} arbitrary, violative^{of principalsof natural justice and against the} article i4, lg, 2l &'^{300 A constitutionof India consequentlydirect} the Respondent^{No.1to givc suitable instructions to theRespondent} No.2 & 3 to hnalize^{the ontine applicationmadeby the Petitioner wide} LM No.2100108786 and^{another LMNo 2100108787dated} 31.12.2021 forthwith^{and pass suchother order or orders"}

¶34

Amended Prayer^{vide Order dated 26 O8-2O25in I A No I of 2023 is} as follows:-

¶35

"... declare^{the action of the respondent No.2 herein in not initiate} any action upon^{my on line applicationsLM No'210O1O8786and} accordance *ith th.^{ordersof this Hon'ble Courtvide in W'PNo'} No.2100108787 dated^{3l-12-2021 filedin accordancewith the orders} of this Hon'ble Court^{vide in W.P.No6228 of 2020 dated O3-L2-2O21,} for correction wrong^{entries in the Dharani Portaland as wellas} connected revenue in^{Sv.No.2OOto an extent of agriculturalland} Ac.2-00 guntas out^{of Ac.O6 35 guntassituated at Phanagiri Village,} Nagaram Mandal, Suryapet^{District,and issued Digital Pass Books in} .."Ip""t of the above^{said landin lavour of the respondent Nos'5 and} O is ittegal and consequently^{direct the respondentNo 2 hereinto set} aside tie illegal^{pattas obtained by the unofhcialrespondentNos'S} and 6 colluded^{with the respondent No.3herein and restore the name} of the petitioner^{herein in place of her late husband as Per the} registerid sale deed^{documentNo.825/ 1977 dated 17-08-1977} exicuted by the^{respondentNo.4 herein in favourof the husband of} the petitioner^{beforethe SRO Suryapet forthwithandpass such other} order or orders^..."

¶36

the 2 Heard Mr.Kodipelli^{Sridhar, learned counselfor} petitioner, Mr.H.Rakesh Kumar,^{Iearned Assistant Government} Pleader representing learned Government^{Pleader for Revenue} appearlng for respondent^{Nos. ito 3 and Ms.Urmila, learned}

¶37

2

¶38

counsel representing Mr.Chalakani Venkat Y rrlav, learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 and 6

¶39

When the matter is taken up for conside^. ation, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitior cr.has hled an application under Dharani Portal seeking correr t jon of wrong entries in the revenue records in respect of the ap;.ic:ultural lald admeasuring Acs.2-00 guntas out of Acs.O6- tli I+tntas in Sv.No.2OO situated at Phanagiri Village, Nag ram Mandal, Suryapet District. However, pending Writ Petition, the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2024 firr short, "rhe Act") has come into place. Therefore, he seeks a rjirt:ction to the official respondents to pass appropriate orders.

¶40

4 Learned Assistant Government Pleader lor Re 'r:nue by fiiing counter affidavit also seeks a direction to the pt.:itioner to file fresh application AS per the Act and that the s rne would be considered in due course of time.

¶41

5 Respondent No.4, filed counter afficlavit bur r. one appea-rs on his behatf

¶42

Ms.Urmila, ie:rrned counsel representing res ,r_ nclent Nos.5 and 6 also seeks to pass appropriate orders.

¶43

--,,

¶44

Having regard to the submissions^of all^{the learned counsel,} this Court^{-withoutgoing} into the merits^{or demerits of the case is} inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition^{by directing the petitioner} to hle a fresh applicatior .rs per the^{provisions of the Art, within} four (4) weeks from the date of receipt cf -^{copy of the order. On} liling such application, the official respondents are^{directed to} consider the same ald pass appropriate orders,^{as expeditiously} as possible, in accordarce with 1au',^{tvithoutcollecting any fees.}