Dismissed¶42

Khaja Zaheeruddin v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC27 Oct 2025WP/7311/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Procedural dismissal only (no merits ruling): Telangana High Court WP 7311/2021 (decided 27-10-2025, K. Sarath, J.) challenging Special Tribunal Karimnagar order dt.29-01-2021 via mandamus under Art. 226 (natural justice; Arts. 14, 21, 300-A); counsel gave up vakalat, fresh notice returned unserved ('no such addressee'), petition dismissed for non-prosecution without costs and misc. applications closed. Citeable only as status/procedural authority, not for any holding on the challenged order.

What did the court decide?

Since the petitioner's counsel had given up the vakalat and the notice issued to the petitioner on the Court's direction of 11.08.2025 was returned unserved endorsed 'no such addressee at this address', the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, with no order as to costs. ¶42

Khaja Zaheeruddin Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰² ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

I\4ONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 7311 OF 2021

¶8

Between:

¶9

Khaja Zaheeruddin, S/o Late Khaja Qutbuddin aged about 62^years,occ. Business RYo H.No. 3-5-174, Azmathpura Karimnagar Town and^lVlandal, Karimnagar District.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, reo. by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Special Tribunal, Karimnagar rep. by the Member Collector and^District ltrlagistrate Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

¶14

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

¶15

The Tahsildar, Karimnagar Rural [Vlandal, Karimnagar District.

¶16

Velishala ftilallesham, S/o Narayana age.62^years, occ: Business,^{Rl/o H.No.} 5-6-85, Kapuwada, Karimnagar, Karimnagar^Dist.

¶17

Narla Prabhaker, S/o Vittalaiah age.57^years, occ: Business,^{R/o H.No. 8-7-} 180, Kothirampur, Karimnagar, Karimnagar Dist.

¶18

Akula Madhu, S/o Veeramallu age.52^years, occ: Business,^Fl/o H.No.7-'1318, [Vlankammathota, Karimnagar, Karimnagar^Dist.

¶19

Gourishetty Prabhaker, S/o Ramulu age.62^{years. occ: Business, R/o H.No.} 2-B-1 66, [t/ukarampura, Karimnagar, Karimnagar^Dist.

¶20

Koduri Narsamma, W/o Late Srinivas age.53^years, occ: Household,^Rl/o H.No. 5-6-85, Thirumalapur (v) Ramadugu Mandal, Karimnagar^Dist.

¶21

'10.Kanna Aruna, W/o Shankar Lingam age. 53 years, occ: Household, Rl/o H-No. 1-3-88, Padmashali Street Karimnagar, Karimnagar^Dist.

¶22

Narla Srinivas, S/o Chandramouli age. 55^years, occ: Business,^{Fl/o H.No. B-} 4-357, Ganeshnagar, Karimnagar, Karimnagar Dist.

¶23

'12. Katkuri lvlallesham, S/o Bhoomaiah age. 60 years, occ: Business, Rl/o Sainagar, Karimnagar, Karimnagar Dist.

¶24

Banda Krishna Mu(hy, S/o Peddana age. 59 years, o(x : Retd. Govt. Employee, Fl/o H.No. 10-5-512, Kisann-agar Sireet, KE r mnagar, Karimnagar Dist.

¶25

Guru Ramdass Educational Society, Society Regd. Nr . 70Bi|2OOO,401, Jade Arcade^'1 26, lr/.G. Road, Secunder-abad rep by the Ger :ral Secretary Sii N/. Satchi

¶26

Danada Rao, S/o t\il. Thirupathi Rao age. Major, occ: ii siness, Rl/o Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

¶27

16 Kodithyal [.4allesham, S/o Venkataiah,.6l years, R/o l\k na Kondur (v) and ( I,4 ), Karimnagar Dist.

¶28

lT.Vivekananda Educational Society, Regd.No. 632tBl2C( I Regd. Office at 40.1 , Jade Arcade, 126 lV.GRoaIt, Secunderabad rep. by Vir e-Prdsident Kalakuntla Thirupathi Rao S/o K. Sanjeeva Rao, ag'e : ( years, Rl/o H.No_ 7-127l5, Ameerpet. Hyderabad.

¶29

(R 5 to R17 are impleaded as per C.O.dt. 26.O3.202j ir tA No. 212021) fl-hg-W?^{is dismissedfor default against the R 5 to R1 7 as per C.O.dt.} 26.O3.2025.)

¶30

...RESPONDENTS

¶31

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of ln j a praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, thrr High eourt may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particular 1 one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order vrde proceedings No. srl16212021lDl8403l2o13 dt.29-01-2021 passed by the 2rr Respondent Speciat Tribunal, Karimnagar as illegal, arbitrary, violative of prrnc i rles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14,21 and 300-4 of the ccr stitution of lndia and consequently set-aside the same.

¶32

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶33

Petition under sectron 151 cpc praying that in the ci cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High corrr : may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order vide proceedings No. srl16212021lDl84o3l2013 dt.29-01-2021 passed by the 2rrr Respondent Special Tribunal, Karimnagar, pending disposal of the writ petition

¶34

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.SAJAN KUMAR

¶35

Counsel forthe Respondents No.1 to 4: Gp FOR REVENUT

¶36

Counsel for the Respondents No.S lo 17 - - - - -

¶37

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶38

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶39

WRIT PETITION No.731 L of 2O2L

¶40

ORDER:

¶41

On 11.08.2025, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner in view of the learned Counsel lor the petitioner having given up the vakalat and the notice sent to. the petitioner was returned unserved with an endorsement as "no such addressee at this address,, and was returned to the sender.

¶42