Writ petition challenging a Revenue Divisional Officer's direction to evict the petitioner from a residential portion in Hyderabad. Counsel for the petitioner stated the cause did not survive; the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous and closed pending miscellaneous petitions, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 3781 OF 2022
Between:
Mr. R.Arvind. S/o: R.Narsimlu, Aged 41years, Occ: Contractor, Rl/o H.No.5-9'1 73 and 174, Chapal Road, Abids, Hyderabad, T.S.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to rssue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari declaring the lmpugned Order in Lr.No.D/6088/20021 dated 10-12202'1 passed by the 3'd respondent thereby requesting the 4th respondent to take necessary action asper law to evict thepetitioner from the residentialportion admeasuring 800 square feet formingpart andparcel of the eniire building bearing distinct municipalNo.5-9-173 and 174 situated at ChapelRoad, Hyderabad and bounded on North by Open to sky andneighbor's house/hostel, South by staircase
and corrtdor and lift and Government school and apartment, E ast by Slab, corridor and entrance and Church, West by open to sky'12 road leadi rg to Chappel Road, at the instance of the 6th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, un-c rnstitutional, without jurisdiction, violative of principles of natural justice and consr> luently set-aside the same in the interest of justice.
lA NO: 2 OF 2022
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the crrr umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order in Lr.No. Dl6t BBI2OO21 dated 1012-2021 passed by the 3'd respondent during the penden: r of the present writ petition in the interest of justice.
lA NO: 3 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci., umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court m:r, be pleased to direct the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 not to interfere with the pee r eful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the residential portron adrr;asuring g00 square feet forming part and parcel of the entire building bearing d s tinct municipal No.s9-173 and 174 situated at Chapel Road, Hyderabad and b runded on North by Open to sky and neighbors house/hostel, South by staircase and corridor and lift and Government school and apartment, East by Slab, corrc cr and entrance and Church, West by open to sky 12 road leading to Chappel : cad. pursuant to the impugned order in Lr.No. D/6088120021 dated 1O-12-2Or,. passed by the 3d respondent during the pendency of the present writ peti irn in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C. KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel forthe Respondent No.6: SRI VIJAY plSSAy
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.378l of 2o22
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and no further orders are required to be passed in this matter,
thereby, the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
pending in this u,rit petition shall stand closed.
SD/-U. SUDHA AS ISTANT REGIST
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To,
:
HIGH COURT
DATED:1711012025
ORDER
WP.No.3781 of 2022
..:ir{ESIA
o
,J i 2 JtN 2026
t
1:-9n. ;;'t:: . .r7'/
'-:=i-.//
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
(,1 <br>r\r \th
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned eviction direction issued at the instance of the sixth respondent was liable to be quashed.
R. Arvind
The State of Telangana
The District Collector, Hyderabad District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad Division
The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City
The Station House Officer, Abids Police Station
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
