The writ petition challenging police inaction in Crime No.249 of 2009 was dismissed as infructuous because the respondents submitted that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had already been filed.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3486 J
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 6416 OF 2014
Between:
AND
--........ffi7 -7
(Respondents No.4 to I are formal parties and not necessaryparties for the present writ petition.)
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under A(icle 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the in-action of the 3rd respondent in investigating and filing a charge sheet in Crime No. 249l2OOg on his file against the formal respondents 4 to I herein as illegal, arbitrary and against theprovisions of Article 14 of the Constitution of lndia.
l.A. NO: 3 OF 2014(W PMP. NO: 7967 OF 20141
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the 3rd respondent to immediately investigate the case in Crime No. 249 of 2009 on file of Central Crime Station (CCS), Hyderabad, anij file a charge sheet expeditiously, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counselior the Petitioner: SRI LOHITH KONDA, rep. SRI B.CHANDRASEN REDDY
Counsel for Respondents No.l to 3 :SRl B.SRIDHAR, AGP FOR HOME
Counsel for Respondents No.4 to I :-
The Court made the following: ORDER
' ,.- ,'/y
t I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.6416 of 2O14
ORDER:
l-leard Sri Lohith Konda, Iearned counsel representir.rg Sri B. Chandrasen Reddy, learned Senior Counsel on record appearing for the petitioners and Sri Sridhar Bhuvanagiri, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos. I to 3, and perused the entire material available on record.
2
As a scquel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stancl closed
sd/- u. AS STRAR i/TRUE COPYII TION OFFICER
To,
s
BSK
I
MP
HIGH COURT
DATED:0910912025
ORDER
ii\lr.
lg i1l.'
!
I I
(-) 2 o JAl'l 202t !i
*
c1
WP.No.6416 of 2014
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
tt\2 ,z
,/"
/*z
a}r'
,/ /;<<br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the inaction of the police in investigating and filing a charge sheet is illegal and arbitrary?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Srinivasa Akella
Krishna Kidambi
The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Home Secretary
The City Police Commissioner, Hyderabad City, Hyderabad
Investigating Officer, Central Crime Station
VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
