Petitioner alleged illegal mining and pollution on his land by crusher firms without licences and sought directions to authorities to act and compensate him. With no representation for the petitioner in any session, the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32551
1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V,SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PET] N NO: 6389 OF 2018
Between:
Gangadhar Anjaiah, S/o. Late Papaiah, Na. 70years, Occ; Agriculture,Rl/o. Rairopet(V), Bibinaga(M), Telangana.
.....PETITIONER
AND
-d!'{rhiu*"{ii"r
.: ''
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court maybe pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction moreparticularly one in thenatureof Writ of Mandamus and direct this respondentno.1 to 4 to take appropriate action against respondent no.S to 7 andits alliedfirms as they are involvedin illegal mining in my land in Sy.no. 42(new421 alll),Rairopetvillage, Bibinagarmandal,
j . ;) -L;:-rl-i:-
Yadadri District(OId- Nalgonda District) and also causing pollution, without obtaining permission, licenses and not following the government procedures, Rules and Regulations and consequently stop themining and allied activities, compensate me for illegal mining in my land.
!.A.NO:1 OF 2018
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated ih the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all activities of respondent no.5 to 7 and its allied firms in Sy.no. 42 (new 42lal15), Rairopet village, Bibinagar mandal, Yadadri District(Otd- Nalgonda District) till the writ petition.
l.A.NO:2 OF 2018
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the grant Leave the Sth Respondent firm for filing the additional material papers documents No.R1 to R15 in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI TOGASWAR NITEEN
Gounsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FoR INDUSTRTES AND coMMERcE
.-.< +-f{.+a.i-r-*.+.?
-. --^..
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : GP FOR REVENUE
Gounsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI P.SHIV KUMAR
.i Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : -
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7 : SRI P.SRINIVAS
The Court made the following ORDER
i,il*lrl.t
// ,/ ,/
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR
W.P. No.63 89 of 2OLg
Date:11.1 .2o.25
Between:
Gangadhar Anjaiah
... Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretdry, Mining Department, Hyderabad, and Six others.
. Respondents
ORDER:
Today, though the matter has been listed under the caption for "Specially Identified cases", there is no representation for the petitioner either by physical-?resence or by virtual mode in the forenoon session as well in the afternoon session. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter and this Court has no other option except to dismiss this writ petition for non prosecution.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
SD/.P.PONNAKRISHNA a55isranrREGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// (9,. SECTIONOFFICER
To l.TwoCCstoGPFoR|NDUSTR|ESANDooIVIMERCE,HighCourtforthe r ' ii;i" "f T"Lng'ni Jt Hvd"t'bad' [our]
I
"l
III I
h
2' Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Tetangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3- one cc to sRr TOGASWAR NrrEEN, Advocate topucl 4. one CC to SRtp.SHtV KUMAR, Advocri" (OFUbJ' 5. One CC to SRtp.SRlNtVAS, Advocate tOpUC)- - ' 6. Two CD Copies SA GJPw
**---rqlrrir *.4{dr:,a1.ifrteq-
, I
HIGH COURT
DATED i1111212025
/ /
ORDER
-i i.il: S
(it
t'
17 Eii mf
+
ir - , .. .: '. :
r ''r,, ..i r.-
WP.No.6389 of 2018
-. ..-d ., r. !, -.r,-iD-.,...r--
.." r 1- i-frf"ltf,ti,;qi+rFr r.q..+
DISMISSING THE W.P
FOR NON PROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS.
\o ""fl"bfto,'
. " i' - ..'..;:,i-i":;:, ai'.11i"';" l.'i.. ,. .. . '..-..i...:.r':,:::*tY-it?i'!.,j,.t{ki8"r -"-,_:ii I 1r:,: i l
Gangadhar Anjaiah
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Prl Secretary, Mining Department
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Prl Secretary, Revenue Department
The District Collector, Bibinagar (M), Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri District
The Member Secretary, Pollution Control Board, State of Telangana
M/s Infra
N.V. Shravan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
