Article 226 writ petition for mandamus to investigate Crime No.142/2014 dismissed as infructuous on parties' consensus; no costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed. ¶¶37-¶39
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous upon petitioner's counsel submitting that the cause does not survive for adjudication and respondent's counsel raising no objection; no costs awarded and all pending miscellaneous petitions stand closed. ¶¶33-¶38
132'.t7 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY.THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION NO: 6294 OF 2016
Between:
S ABHISHEK, S/o S. Ashok Kumar, aged aboul22 ears, Occ: Student, R/o H.No.11-'1 3-5701207, Parimala Nivas, Haripuri (-volony, Saroornagar, Cyberabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petitron under Article 226 of lhe Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Courl may be pleased to issue a Writ/s, Orderis or Dtrectionmore particularlyone in the nature of Wrrtof l,4andamus declaring the inaction of the3rd respondentin proceedingwith investrgation in Crime No.14212014 as beingillegal, arbitrary,u nconstitutionaI and violatrve of Article 21 of the Constitution andconsequently directthe respondent no.3 to proceed with investigation in CrimeNo.14212014 of the petitioner
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 8003 0F 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Courtmay be pleased to issue interim directions to respondentno.3 toforthwithproceedwithinvestigatronin Crime No.142l2O14 o'f thepetitioner, pending disposalof writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.V VENKATA MAYUR
Counsel for the Respondents:SRI R. LAXMIKANTHREDDY AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:ORDER
) )
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.I'I]KARAMJI
WRIT I')ETITION No.6294 OF 2016
ORDER:
This wlrt Petition is filed under Article 225 ol(bnstitution of lndia seekins the following rel-ief/s:-
". .. to issue a Wrt. Orders or Dircction rr-rore part.clrlarll' one in the naturc ol Vrit of Mturdamus declaring the inr,. tirn ol.the Jd respondent in proceeding r.ith investigation in Cnurc No.142 of 2a74 as be ing illegal, ;rr-bitrary, unconstitutional ar .d r,iol:uive of Anicle -l1 of thc C,onstitution and consequ,:ntlv direct rcspondent No.i to procecd rvith in.,estiqtrtion in, lr ime No.142 of 2014 of the petitionerand pass....."
petitioner and l\4r.Rla-xmikrnth Reddy lcarlecl fusistant
Govemment l)leirder tor Home appearine for resPc,ndcnt Nos.1 to
J
the same.
)
5 Recording thesubmissions of both the leamed counsel, this
Writ Petition is dismissedas infructuous' No costs'
MiscellaneousPetitions, pending if any, shall stand closed'
SD/. A. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to SRl. V VENKATA N/AYUR Advocate [OPUC]
3 Two CD Copies KKS GJP
\ \
HIGH COURT
DATED:1910812025
ORDER
WP.No.6294 of 2016
1 FrE ,SI,q
../I
a
a
/) r
26 ilou m
c
1
.d+
I *
<br>SPatcHEo
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
U
..)
\
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the inaction of the 3rd respondent (SHO, PS Cybercrimes) in proceeding with investigation in Crime No.142 of 2014 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.¶¶17
2 provisions across 2 enactments
How this case reached the court
Inaction of 3rd respondent in proceeding with investigation in Crime No.142 of 2014¶¶17
Police Station Cybercrimes, Cyberabad
I.A. No. 1 of 2016 (WPMP No. 8003 of 2016) under Section 151 CPC for interim directions to respondent no.3 to forthwith proceed with investigation in Crime No.142 of 2014 pending disposal of writ petition¶¶18-¶19
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
