Dismissed¶34

M. Ramesh, S/o Nanaji, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Aug 2025WP/5886/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court; Writ Petition No. 5886 of 2015; M. Ramesh v. State of Telangana; writ petition dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission; auto driver; permanent registration refused despite temporary registration certificate; Guideline No. IV in Lr. No. 792/R1/2009 dt. 13-09-2012; Transport Commissioner; Regional Transport Authority Hyderabad East Zone; Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21; Article 226; Section 151 CPC; miscellaneous petitions dismissed; no costs; decided 19-08-2025 by Justice K. Sarath.

What did the court decide?

Recording learned counsel for the petitioner's submission that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. ¶34

M. Ramesh, S/o Nanaji, Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

I I

[^]3021

i I

I I I I I II! I I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶6

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶7

TUESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶8

PRESENT

¶9

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO: 5886 OF 2015

¶11

Between:

¶12

M. Ramesh, S/o Nanaji, Aged about 38 years, Occ: Auto Driver, Rl/o 18-64't 5/8, Lalitha Bagh, Uppuguda, Chandrayanagutta (lV), Hyderabad.

¶13

...PETITIONER

¶14

AND

¶15

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Transport Roads and Buildings (TR.l) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶16

2 The Transport Commissioner, Government of Telangana, Khairtabad, Hyderabad.

¶17

3 The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Hyderabad East Zone, Hyderabad.

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be^pleased to issue writ order or direction especially one in the Nature of Writ of fVlandamus declaring the guidelines No.lV in Lr. No.792lR1/2009 dt. 13-09-2012 issued by the 2nd respondent as arbitrary, illegal and discriminatory violating Article^'14, 19 (1)^(g) and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and set aside the same and further declare the action of the 3rd respondent in not issuing permanent registration to the^petitioner in pursuance of the temporary registration certificate issued to him is also illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to issue the^permanent registration certificate to the^petitioner in pursuance of the temporary registration certificate

¶20

l.A. NO: 1OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 7855 OF 2015)

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the Guideline No. 4 issued in Lr. No. 7921R112009 dt.13-09-2012 issued by the 2nd respondent^pending disposal of the main writ^petition.

¶22

l.A. NO: 2 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 7856 OF 2015

¶23

j i I t

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the r;ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rlay be pteased to direct the 3rd respondent to forthwith issue the permanent registration and permil to the petitioner in pursuance of the temporary registration certifi,:ate pending disposal of the main writ petition

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. CH RAVINDER

¶26

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR TRANSPORT

¶27

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

'r-.:

¶29

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶30

WRIT PETITION No.5886 of 2015