Neelapu Payan Reddy v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3446 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
WRIT PETITION NO: 5290 OF 2025
Between:
Ng"l?p.r.Pqy-anReddy, S/o N SrinivasaReddy,Age.26 years, Occ. Student, Rl/o. H.No. 20-1-14, Neelimukku, Pedhagantya-da, Visakafatnam, Ap.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or dlrection more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioner for registration for admission into PG-Medical course for the academic year 2024-25 under Management Quota Category 2 (NRl) for next/Stray vacancy phase of counseling and subsequent phase of counseling as illegal, arbitrary, u nco nstitutiona I and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioner request for registration for admission into PG-Medical course under [\4anagement euota Category 2 (NRl) in next/Stray vacancy phase of counseling and subsequent phases of counseling for the academic year 2024-25.
IAN O:1 OF2025
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directthe 2nd respondentto considerthe petitioner requestfor registration for admissioninto PG-Medicalcourse under Management Quota Category 2 (NRl)in next/Strayvacancy phaseof counselingand subsequent phasesof counseling for theacademic year 2024-25 pendingdisposal of the writ petition.
Counselfor the Petiti6ner: SRI ANJANAYULU YADANABOYINA
Counselfor the RespondentNo.1:GP FORMEDICAL HEALTHFW Counselfor the RespondentNo.2:SRI T.SHARATH, SC FORKNRUHS The Courtmade the following: ORDER
/
THE HON'BLETHE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICESUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICERENUNAYARA
WRIT PETITIONNo.5 29O of 2o25
ORDER(Perthe Hon'blethe ActingChtef JusticeSujog Paul):
Sri Y.Anjaneyulu,learned counsel for the petitionerand Sri T. Sharath,learned Standing Counsel for Kaloji Narayana Rao Universityof Health Sciences, for respondent No'2'
2 Heard on admission.
t I
4 Learned Standingcounsel for respondentNo'2 has no objection to thisinnocuousprayer.
5 Accordingly, thisWrit Petition is disposed ofbY permitting the petitionerto file such representation along with
t
2
relevant documents belore respondent No.2. In turn, respondent No.2 sha-ll consider and decide such representation, in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned order before the next counselling. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. No costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also
stand closed
SD/. P. PADMANABHA DDY ASSISTANT G TRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION FFICER
\
To,
BSR
s
CC TODAY
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2110212025
ORDER
e 1 HE SI4 14:
( o
d
a:
3' z 1 FEB'zffi 7z
i: I
.;:
1.
WP.No.5290 of 2025
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION,
WITHOUT COSTS
?p)f
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to seek registration for PG-Medical admission under Management Quota Category 2 (NRI) for 2024-25 via a representation to the University?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N. Praveen Reddy
The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Medical and Health Family Welfare Department
Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, represented by its Registrar, Warangal
Sujoy Paul
Renuka Yara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court