Disposed

M/s Al Muneer Mm Traders v. The Superintendent

Telangana HC20 Feb 2025WP/3940/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged cancellation of its GST registration by Form GST REG-19 order dated 02.12.2024. The respondents produced an order revoking the cancellation, rendering the petition infructuous. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to issue a fresh show cause notice.

What did the court decide?

No relief; cancellation already revoked; liberty to respondents to proceed via fresh show cause notice; no costs.

M/s Al Muneer Mm Traders Vs The Superintendent — GST and Indirect Tax | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³⁴⁴⁶ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originat Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

¶6

THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 3940 0F 202s

¶8

Behreen:

¶9

M/s Al Muneer MM Traders, Having address at 3-5-30, chinthakunta wada, Jagtial, Telangana- 50s 327 Repiesented by iis- Fioprietor, rrrrrneeiuJui,i Mohd, aged about 68 years, S/b. Vakeel J'ani--MohdmmaO, n(o. S_S_C0, Chinthakunta Wada, Jagtial, Karimnagar, fetanigani_ SOS SZZ

¶10

.,.PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The Superintendent, Jagityal Range, Karimnagar Division JVedchal uommrssionerate, 2nd Floor, H.No.B_7_296/1,-Manikanta Complex, Hanuman Nagar, Karimnagar-50S001

¶13

The Joint Dirggtor, o{g. Directorate Generar of GST rnteilioence, Hvderabad Zonat Unit, H. No. 1_63t42t12, ptot No. 211 anO zrz, niroi[_8,7;il;iiiit;,^' Guttala Begumpet, Madhapur, Hyderabad -500033

¶14

l-lnion of lndia, Ministry of Finance, Represented by its Secretary, North Brock, New Delhi-l 10001

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High'cJurt may ue pleased to issue a writ, order, or direction more particularty oni in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, declaring the notice issued by Respondent No. 1 vide ref. no. 243610241977938 dated 29.10.2024 in Form GST REG- 17 and impugned order vide order rei no zA\61224oo2ogsu in Form GST REG-1g iutZa tiziz.ioii-", being. void_, arbilrary, illegal, without authority of law and without jurisdiction, violative of the Principles of Natural Justice apart from being violative of Articles 14, 19(1xg), 21 and 26s of the constitution of rndia, and to consequenfly set aside the notice and Impugned order by restoring the GST registration of the petitioner and pass such further or other order(s) as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶18

Petition underr Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumst;lnces stated in the affidavit fired in support of the p"irtion, inl iigr' courr may be ;re;;;; to suspend the operiation of rmpugned oroei rei no" zes6rz2qo02og9u in Form GST REG-19 dated 02.12.2024 i; the interest of .l*ti"" and equi\r as otherwise, the Petitioner will be put to irreparable loss and trrrJrnlp".

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.UMA SHANKAR REp., FOR SRt. V VEERESHAM

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2: SRI DOMINIC FERNANDES (senior standing counsel for CBIC)

¶21

counsel for the Respondent No.3: sRl puLIMAMlDr sHASHTDHAR REDDy The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

I I

¶23

) I

¶24

THE HON'BLE^{THE ACTINGCHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL}

¶25

AND

¶26

THE HON'BLE^{SMT. JT.ISTICERENUKA YARA}

¶27

WRIT PETITIO^{NNo.394O of2o25}

¶28

ORDER: (Per the Hon'bli the^{ActingChief Justice Sujoy Paul)}

¶29

Sri M.Uma Shankar,^{learned counseirepresenting} Sri V.Veeresham,^{learned counsel appearingfor the petitioner} andSriDominicFernandes,learnedSeniorStandingCounsel

¶30

for CBIC, appea-rs^{for respondent Nos'1 and 2'}

¶31

The challenge^{ismounted to thecancellationof} registration order^{dated02.12-2024'}

¶32

Learned Senior^{Standing Counsel for CBIC producedthe} OC.No.158/2025,^{dated 14.O2.2025issued by respondentNo'1} and informed that^{the said cancellation order has been revoked'} Therefore, this^{petition has renderedinfructuous'}

¶33

In view of the same,^{the Writ Petition is disposed of'} by reserving liberty^{to the respondentsto proceed against the} petitioner by issuing fresh^{show causenotice'}

¶34

in accordance with law.^{No costs}

¶35

¶36

i,:,

¶37

interloc,rtory applications, if any pending, shr l also

¶38

stand closed

¶39

SD/- T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY'

su*TION OFFICER

To,

1 The Suoerintendent,^{Jagityal Range, Karimnag.ar Division' Medchal..} c.ji',ilj5."i',iiiliiri.i,'il;l^{Fi;br' A.r't6.d-z-zsort,-Manikanta comrrlex'Hanuman} Nagar, Karirrrnagar-50500'1

¶44

2 TheJointDirector,O/o.DirectorateGeneralofG^S.T^lntellioence'HvderabadZonar -e", ttZ^f u= U nit, e ;^g, H^{nl No. p"t, 1 M -63/42liz,"e',"r,ji adh a p r t, H yde N-;' ra b ) ad i l -5} ilg^{0 0 0 i::' 3 3BlocL-B'(avuri Hills'}

¶45

3 The Secretary,Union^{of lndia, Ministry of Finance'NorthBlock New Delhi-} 1 10001

¶46

4 One CC to^{SRl. V. VEERESHAIV'IAdvocate[OPUC]}

¶47

5 oneCCtoSRl'DoMINICFERNANDES(seniorstandingcounselforCBlC) loPUCl /

¶48

6 One CC to SR.I^{PULIMAMIDI SHASHIDHARREDDYAdvocate[OPUC]}

¶49

7 Two CD CoPies

KKS GJP ?k

HIGH COURT

DATED:20102t2025

ORDER

WP.No.3940 of 2O2S

::=:-
/:< HE rrii..i i5
c
2/ t'lirn 20ff
i.o.
x*:t- *

¶56

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (r--t/7^| 1 \4 )>r'

M/s Al Muneer Mm Traders v. The Superintendent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Al Muneer Mm Traders v. The Superintendent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr .G. Venkata Ajith Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Alr Labs Private Limited, Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Ms. Naredla Eesha Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Ganda Arundathi Vs The State of Telangana

M/s.Sahithi Marketers, Vs The Superintendent of Central Tax

M/s. Munna India Erectors Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)