Petitioner alleged interference with his possession of a 307 sq. yard plot at Medchal village. Government denied interfering. Court, without deciding entitlement, directed respondents not to interfere with petitioner's possession except through due process of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 5274 OF 2025
Between:
Vallapu_Nage_shwar Rao, S/o late Vallepu Venkateshwara Rao Aged about 40 y9ap, Ogg. Business, Rl/o. H.No.1-11, Munirabad Village, Medchat Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana.
...PETITIONER AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order or direction more particularly in the Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering in the peaceful 'pbssession of the petitioners plot no. 13 admeasuring about 307 Sq. yards situated in Sy no 139, 144 and 143 Medchal village, Kistapur road, Medchal Malkajgiri district as the same is illegal arbitrary and unjust and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioners plot No. 13 admeasuring about 307 Sq. yards in survey no 139,143 144 in Medchal village, Kistapur road, Medchal Malkajgiri district.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 4, 6 and 7 not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner's plot No.1 3, admeasuring about 307 Sq. Yards, situated in Survey No. 139,143 and'144 of Medchal Village, Kistapur Road, Medchal Malkajgiri District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NARESH KUMAR GORIGE Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.l TO 4: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE
counsel for the Respondent No.s: sMT. D.MADHAVI, SC FOR HMDA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: SRI N.SRIDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL
The Court made the following: ORDER
,/rj
:-)
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.5274 of 2o25
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed praying this Court to declare the action of the respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioner over the plot No.13 admeasuring 307 square yards, situated in Sy.Nos.l3g, 144 and 143 of Medchal Village, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of the principles of natural justice and consequentrally prayed for other approprrate reliefs.
2
CVBR, J \p 5274 2025
and enjoyment over the subject property, without following due process of law.
3
CVBR, J Wp_5274 2025
J t I
neighbouring survey number, is trying to encroach upon the Government land. It is further submitted that the respondent No.4 is not interfering with the possession of the petitioner in respect of land admeasuring 3O7 Sq yards situated at Sy.Nos.l39, 143 and 144 situated at Medchal Village and Mandal, Medchal- Malkaj giri District.
of. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/-A.V.S. PRASAD
ASSIS ANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
---_-..-----
CTION OFFICER
To
i II iI
HIGH COURT
DATED:21 10212025
\ \
ORDER
1 HE. JIA i
( o B 6
c
J P)
,.J 0 6 llAB 2025 r,l
!ti
.a'
t ,) t
D€spnr cH'-
WP.No.5274 o12025
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
II
/F
4.A
,/z 4
b
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents could interfere with the petitioner's possession of plot No. 13 in Sy.Nos. 139, 143 and 144 without following due process of law.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vallapu Nageshwar Rao
The State of Telangana, Revenue Department, Rep by its Secretary
The District Collector, Medchal-Malkajgiri District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kesara
The Mandal Revenue Officer, Medchal Mandal
The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Rep by its Commissioner
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
