Disposed

Md.Abbas v. Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

Telangana HC24 Feb 2025WP/46211/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking mandamus to declare the petitioner unfit for the driver post under TSRTC despite medical representations. Counsel submitted no further orders were needed in view of an earlier interim order; the court recorded this and disposed of the writ petition, closing pending miscellaneous petitions with no order as to costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

Md.Abbas Vs Telangana State Road Transport… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2025)

I3301 l

1 l

. HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} ATHYDERABAD (SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶5

.MONDAY

¶6

,THE^{TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY} rWO TUOUSNND^{AND TWENTYFIVE}

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE,SRI^{JUSTICEPULLA KARTHIK} 211 0F 2018 IT PETI TION^NO:

¶9

Between:

¶10

54, R/o 5-93, Md.Abbas,^{S/o.Md.$asheed,Occ Driver'E No 150274' Age} 'dlifi',iir'rivdi, iiiatiiepattvlMl, Nasarkumool^(Dist)' ...PETITIONER

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

1 Telanqana State RQad^{fJanspo(Corporation' rep' by its ViceChairmanand} yruagigf:',m;,y"';+"'t+Cir:i33lx'i3q,'t"rron,Mahabubnasar

¶14

2 3 +'# ts;iliit4;,iitii6friiei-r'^{istfC i6'plt'I'tarnakZ'Hvderabad} 4 rne turedicat Officer,^{TSR rc'rilL'ii""ri i5i"i-"'iidrv.tr,trh'ablb nagar District'} q + iE iffi ;ifr^{;';"# i i"s Hi"c,'A"rhilp'ei'De por,' rrr a n a b u b n a s a r Di st ri ct.}

¶15

,..BESPONDENTS

¶16

Fetition^{underArtlQle226 of the Constitutienof lndia praying that in thq} circumstanceE^{statedin the affidqvit fileQtherdwiththe Htgh Qqurt maybe} pleqsed to^{isque an qpplqpriqtq Writ, ordero'r Directien'more partlqula't:::} '' the na-ture of^{Writ of MendarQus,lo declare the inactiqnof the responCentsin} dec|aringthepetitionerlereingsgnfitforthqposlof{rlver,irlspitqglSvPmitlllq relevaqt^{medigal rqcordglolloryed py written represerltation dt ?3'10'2q18 gnd} 13-11-2018 as^{being illegal' arbitrary' uniusl andunconqtitutiongl} -and oonsequentlydirecttheteqponpentQUthoritigqto{eclarethepetitiglerhqreinas unfit by^{issuingFormNo, MTD,430}

¶17

!A^{NO:1O F 2018}

¶18

Petition under^{SeQtion15'l QPC praying that in the circumqtancqsstated} in^{the affidavi!fileQ in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleasedtq} direct the^{respondent authgrities to consider and pass orders on thg}

¶19

representation dt 2.3 10.2018 and i3-1 1-2018, by declaring the petitioner herein as medically u nfit ptending disposal of the main Writ petition

¶20

Counsel for the petitioner: SBI. G, BAJESH Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SAI MAHfTA REp sRt R. ANURAG (SC FOR TSRTC)

¶21

The Court made tho following: OBEER

¶22

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEPULLA KARTHIK}

¶23

WRIT PETI^{TION No. 462L1 0F 2018}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Today, when^{the matter istaken up for hearing'} learned^{counsel for the petitioner, submits tfuLt in view of the} interimorderdatedlg.|2.2ol}grantedbythisCourt,no further orders^{are necessaryto be passedin the Writ Petition'}

¶26

Recording^{ttre above said submission' this Writ Petition} is accordinglY^disPosedof'

¶27

Miscellaneous^{petitions, ifany' pending inthis Writ} Petition, shall^{stand closed There shall be no order as to}

costs.

I I

To,

,/TRUE^COPY//

SD'-T.^{TIRUMALA DEVI} AS S NT REGISTRAR

¶33

S CTION^OFFICER

¶34

¶35

lHiB$iffi,i}f.ffi1[ffi$j,.H5Fs-l.';;*

BM lrE9

(

HIGH COUR]'

DATED:24102,12025

{'i

ORDER

WP.No.46211 ot 2018

F
o I:r lHE S 14 r(
(,
I
2 i i,," ?a?s l
<br>'-
\ ' .:.

¶44

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ( I

¶45

at 3 a

Md.Abbas v. Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Md.Abbas v. Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Y.Kanakaiah Vs Sri Lokesh Kumar D.S., Ias.

M/s. Pragathi Urban Rural Development Society Vs The Nizamabad Municipal Corporation

Mudigonda Shirisha Vs Smt Mallaiah Bhattu

G.v.Swaroopa Vs The Regional Joint Director of School Education

M.Parwathalu, Vs Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

Dr. Brahamarambha Vs State of Telangana