Dismissed

M/s. Pragathi Urban Rural Development Society v. The Nizamabad Municipal Corporation

Telangana HC21 Feb 2025WP/45748/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In WP No. 45748 of 2018, the High Court of Telangana heard a petition concerning salary payments to society members. The Court held the cause action was no longer maintainable due to the passage of time and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without costs.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.

M/s. Pragathi Urban Rural Development Society Vs… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD^'-""..

¶3

(special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

FRIDAI:IIE TWENry FIRST DAY OF F€BRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVI " ''

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶7

WRITPETITIO N NO: 4574A oF 2018

¶8

Between:

¶9

H':,[{:ii'B#i,"jilflil{f HHff h:iff#'ff $:Jfr #3}t*:?:!i

AND

...PETITIONER

Ii)"H'"'S*:?,i:#'#:3fl,3f,'loration,^{rep. bv its lVrunicipar} commissioner,

¶14

¶15

I:8,t"#I'i:8Eff tl:ll;r":?:orrvruniciparAdministrarion,srareor

¶16

3 ffi ,'"138?il"i;!ii[?,T3,3,[h!;is,s;: :;"#,:3;#",i! li=?1,,,0,"n.,

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition uMer Arlicle 226 of the Constitutron ot lndra praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the €fft'davit rn"r",tr, tne'H,gh court may be preased to issue writ, order or direction ,"- 'i"J p"rti.rjrl".'.=" mandamus decrarino . t!"^- d;;;;;;;."',"^{,lu};;r,r,"..,.rj.Hr"1,#} No^pH/F2ITMS rcztotmia oateo os. r r.zo;;;;:i., petitioneG societv resaroins pavment or sararies or inJTi."J8:[ J?rlffrgn,I; rnrough bank account bv depositing tn" "rr" io ti,J'6i *orkers of the society and not paying the sataries ot tne. m6moe;.'';i i;" ;";ry through the peritioners society as was done in the last + years is ,oio, ,rr"g"i;."oi,-., and unconstitutionar and consequenilv direct t'"^rst rGpoloi";il;;;?J'rararies of the members of issuins a cheque or depositin! itrl saine tnrousir rhe bank of thl ff,,i""""fy.:L

¶19

(

¶20

lA NO:^'l OF 2018

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to pay the salaries of the members of the society by issuing a cheque or depositing the same through the bank of the petitioners society without reference to the impugned Proceedings bearing in(ormation No.PH/F2|TMS 1621012018 dated 03.11.2018 of the 1st respondent from October, 2018 onwards pending disposal of the above writ petition

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. S JAGADISH

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: M/s R MADHAVI LATHA, (SC FOR THE SERVICE MATTERS OF MC OF KNR, NZD, RMG AND KHM)

¶24

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2&3: GP FOR SERVICES I

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

fli

¶27

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶28

WRIT PEf,ITION No.45748 oF 2018

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that due to efflux of time the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous.

¶31

Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶32

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to

¶33

CoStS

¶34

SD/.N. SRIHARI S TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

¶35

To,

¶36

SECTION OFFICER

¶37

'l . One CC to SRl. S JAGADISH Advocate tOpUCl 2 Q1e_CC^{to M/s. R MADHAVI_LAII-|A (SC} FOR THE SERvtcE TVATTERS OF MC OF KNR, NZD, RMG AND KHM) {OPUCI

¶38

3 ].w9^{CCs to GP for Senrices-|, High Court} for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶39

4 Two CD Copies KKS GJP

I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:2110212025

i lHE s 14
o
o
r) 10 JUil 26 !L)l
+
:( t), -.1

¶44

ORDER

¶45

WP.No.45748 of 2018

¶46

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

¶47

1 v

M/s. Pragathi Urban Rural Development Society v. The Nizamabad Municipal Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Pragathi Urban Rural Development Society v. The Nizamabad Municipal Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R Roopa Vs The State of Telangana

A. Christopher Vs The State of Telangana

Rathod Vilas Vs State of Telangana

Y.Kanakaiah Vs Sri Lokesh Kumar D.S., Ias.

Mudigonda Shirisha Vs Smt Mallaiah Bhattu

Katroth Hari Vs Dr. a Sharath