Managing Partner, M/S. Nandn Infrastructure, Hyd Vs Prl. Secretary, Revenue Dept., Hyd and 6 Others

N//S. N & N lnfrastructure, a registered^{partnership firm incorporatedunderthe} Registration A.P. Firms Act,-^G-'l ,^{EurekaCourt. Ameerpet,Hyderabad.} repiesented by its Managing^{PartnerP.V.V.S.N. Ivlurty, S/o. Late P.} Adinarayana Murty, aged about^{45 years}

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

1 The State of Telangana, Rep, by^{its Principal Secretary,Revenue} Department, Secretariat,^{Hydelrbrd.:.,} . ,,^.

¶14

2 The Commissioner & Director of^{Survey and Land Records,Survey Bhavan,} Narayanaguda, Hyderabad- 500^029.

¶15

3

¶16

The Collector, Ranga Reddy^{Districtat Lakadikapool, Hyderabad-4.}

¶17

4 The Revenue Divisional Officer,^{Raiendranagar Division lnner Ring Road, Sai} Hills Colony, Rambagh Colony,^{Hyderabad- 500030}

¶18

5 The Assistant Director, Survey and^{Land Records, Ranga Reddy DistrictAt} Lakadikapool, Hyderabad-4

¶19

6 The Tahsildar, Gandipet^lVlandal, Ranga^{Reddy District.}

¶20

7 The Station House Officer, Narsingi^{Police Station, 2-11 Narsingi, Cyberabad,} Hyderabad 500 075.

¶21

...RESPONDENTS

¶22

Petition under Article²²⁶ of^{Ihe Constitution of lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in^{the affidavit filed therewith,the High Courtmay be} pleased to issue a writ or order more^particularly a^{writ of mandamusfor} declaration that the acts^{of the state and its authoritiesin meddling with the} boundary stones already fixed^{in between Sy.No.223and 224 of Manchirevula} Village through survey in^{file No.8/438912013 aod any relocationof the existing} boundaries stones as^{per the whims and fancies of the respondents as illegal.}

¶23

arbitrary, malafide and highhanded, violative of Constitulirnal^{rights guaranteed} under Article 19,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia iLnd further^declaration that the respondents are estopped in relocation of the already^existing boundaries in behveen Sy.No.223 and 224 of Manchirevr- la Village^{whichacts of} the State and its authorities are not permissible.

¶24

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016( WPMP. NO: 56721 OF 2016)

¶25

Petition uncler Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fil<>d in support of the^petition, the High^rlourt may be^pleased pending disposal of the above writ petition directing th e respondents not to forcibly dispossess the petitioner firm from its land of 1 ricre in Sy.No.223l2 of [,4anchirevula Villa ge.

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C. HANUMANTHA, RAO

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6: GP FOR REVENI.IE

¶28

Counsel for the RespondentNo.T: GP FOR HOME

¶29

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶30

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

¶31

,;, ,l

¶32

UIRIT PETITION No.46O61 of 2OL6

¶33

ORDER:

¶34

This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following prayer:

¶35

"... to declare that the acts of the State and its authoities in meddling u.tith boundary stones already ftxed^{inbetuteen Surueg Nos.223and 224 of} Manchireuula Village through Suruey in File No.B/ 4389/ 2013 ond ang relocation of the existing boundary stones as per the uhims and fancies of tLe respondents as illegal, arbitrary, malafide and highhanded, uiolatiue of Constitutional Rights g:uaranteed under Afticles 19, 2 1 and 30O-A of the Constihttion of India and further to declare thot tte respondents are estopped in relocation of the alreadg existing boundaries in betuteen Surueg Nos.223 and 224 of Manchiretrula Village, uhich acts of the State and its authoities are not permissible."

¶36

Today when the matter h4s b-eeh taken up for hearing,

¶37

iearned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court uide

¶38

order dated 28.12.2016 passed the following interim order:-

¶39

"Hauing regard to the facts and circumstances of^the case, if the petitioner is in possession of the land admeasuring Ac.L-OO guntos in Surueg ttto.22^j/ 2 of Manchireuula Village, the respondent - autlnrities shall not di-spossess the petitioner, tuithout follouirq due process of laut, for a peiod of eight (O8) u;eeks'.

¶40

No counters frled by the respondents.

¶41

t earned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue

¶42

appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 6 submits that the^respondent

¶43

'l: '

¶44

2

¶45

authorities will follow due^{process of law beforeinitiatingaction} on the subjecl ProPerty.

¶46

-: l

¶47

Recordirrg the submission made^{by the learned Assistant} Government Pleader for Revenue^{appearing for rr:spondentNos' 1} to 6 and without expressing any^{opinion on tlre merits of the} case, this wnt petition is^{disposedof directing the respondent} authorities tc, follow due^{process as contemplated under1aw} before initiating action^{on the subject property.}

¶48