Disposed

R Roopa v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC20 Feb 2025WP/21517/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Assistant Professor sought career advancement scale up-gradation withheld pending a writ petition challenging a show cause notice on her appointment. Counsel submitted an interim order had redressed the grievance; the High Court recorded this and disposed of the petition without further orders or costs.

What did the court decide?

None beyond interim order dated 27.11.2020 noted as redressing grievance; petition disposed recording counsel's submission.

R Roopa Vs The State of Telangana — Education and Admissions | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶3

THURSDAY ,THE^{TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND^{ANDTWENTY FIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEPULLA KARTHIK}

¶6

WRIT PETITI^{ON NO:215 17 0F 2020}

¶7

Between:

¶8

R Roopa,^{D/o Sri Villa Reddy} 4Sql^{+9 years' Occ Chemistry.Assistant} Professor, o/o^{the D;;,tfi;ioi-cnemistii'M'ahatma GandhiUniversitv'} Nalgonda,^{Nalgonda District}

¶9

...PErlnoNER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of^{Telangana, rep. by its Special.Chief Se,cretary' Higher Education} (UE) Department,^{Telangana Secretariat'HyderaDao}

¶12

2 Mahatma Gandhi^{University,Yellareddyguda, Nalgonda-508 254 Nalgonda} District, Telangana^{rep. by its Registrar}

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under^{Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances^{stated in if," ,tfiO,'it filed therewith'the High Court maybe} pleased to issue un upprofr.iut"^{Writ, Order or Direction' more particularlyone in} ir,"- nrirr" of^{Writ oi rirno,"t,to declarethe impugned action of the} i"IponJ"n1"^{in not considetlng ;n"iioningthe} .up-gradation^{of Grade Pay under} Career Advancement^{s"#o"n- prornotioi scales to the petitioneronly on the} of W.p.-flo'^{8871 I 2O1g againstthe Show CauseNotice} 6r"d dated 16t04t2019 "ip;"dency^{for annulment of her appointmentas Asst' Professoreven} t"rdn tn"*-ii^{no stipulationin tl"UGC guidelinesthat the teachers are not} entifled for sanction^{ot Carler niv"n""."rit Scale if any court cases pending} as ittesat,lrbitrary,^{unlust' discriminatory and violativeof Article} ;;iil^i;;l; l4,l6and2lofConstitutionoflndiaandconsequentlyholdthatthepetitioneris entitled for^{up-gradationoi C"J" Pay under- iareer AdvancementScale on} promotion scales in tne^{posi oi n..t. professor fromthe dateof her eligibility with} all consequential^{and attendant benefits}

¶15

IA NO:1 OF^2O2O

¶16

PetitionunderSectionl5lcPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit^{filed in suppoiot tn" p"tiiion,ir'" Higrt Court may be pleased to.direct} the respondents^{to forthwiifi"on"iO", the caseoi the petitioner for up-gradationof}

¶17

Grade Pay under career Advance.ment scare on promotion scares in the post of Asst. Professor without reference to pendenry ot fi).p. ruo. 8g71 t 2019, pending disposal of writ petition

¶18

Counsel for the^petitioner: SRl. K RAM REDDY

¶19

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: Gp FOR SERVICES I

¶20

9g.:f:t_1..^{tt e RespondentNO.2: Smr c. SUMATHT} ( Sc FoR M.c

¶21

UNIVERSITY)

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶24

WRIT PETITION No.21517 OF 2O2O

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Today, when the matter is taken up for^hearing, Sri K.Ram Reddy, Iearned counsel for the^petitioner, submits that in view of the interim order dated 27.11.2O2O^{granted by} this Court, the grievance of the petitioner stands^redressed Therefore, no further orders are necessary to be^passed in^the Writ Petition.

¶27

Recording the above said submission, this Writ^Petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶28

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as^to

¶29

costs.

¶30

SD/-P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA TANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Special Chief Secretary, Higher^{Education (UE)Depa(ment, Telangana} Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶35

The Registrar Mahatma Gandhi University,^{Yellareddyguda,Nalgonda-508} 254 Nalgonda District, Telangana

¶36

¶37

One CC to SRl. K RAM REDDY Advocate [OPUC]

¶38

4 One CC to Smt G. SUMATHI⁽ SC^{FOR M.G UNIVERSITY)} [OPUC]

¶39

5 Two CCs to GP for Services-|, High^{Court forthe Stateof Telanganaat} Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶40

6 Two CD Copies KKS BS

CC TODAY

HIGH COURT

DATED:2010212025

I I I

ORDER

WP.No.21517 of 2020

\a) Et
tr'
.rJ.
.$,
+
aQ."
"+*
)r.

¶48

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶49

/a
/.2
<t /.< ,/z I

R Roopa v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R Roopa v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D. Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

M.D.Kajamoinuddin Vs The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

Dr.P.Shafi, Vs Director of Medical Education

A. Christopher Vs The State of Telangana

Rathod Vilas Vs State of Telangana

Mohammed Abdul Hafeez, Vs The State of Telangana