Writ petition challenging denial of duty as Dark Room Attendant and appointment of a substitute was withdrawn by the petitioner with leave; the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3301 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION NO:4506 OF 2022
Between:
Meedikeri Venkataiah, S/o. Bugappa, aged about.43 Yrs., Occ. Un employee, Rl/o H. No. 260, Sangam Khurd Village of Yalal Mandal, Vikarabad District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to pass an order or writ particularly writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.2 in notpermitting thepetitioner to discharge duties asDark Room Attendor in the District Hospital at Tandur, inpursuance of theletters dt.1211-2021 and 17-12-2021 and Appointment of the RespondentNo.3 in the place of the petitioner as Dark Room Attendant in the District HospitalTandur by theethan Respondent No.2, as arbitrary; illegal and against theprinciples ofnatural iustice and law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased topass an order Staying the appointment of the respondent no.3 in thepost of the Dark Room Attendant of District Hospital at Tandur and directing the respondent no.2 to allow the petitioner toperform his duties as Dark Room Attendant in District Hospital, Tandur with equalpay and other benefits to the similar situated employees, till the finalization of the Writ Petition to meet the ends ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BAJRANG SINGH THAKUR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: M P K ADIWA (SC TWPI
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI M.A.K. MUKHEED, SC
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I{AR'IHIK
WRIT PEf,ITION No.45O6 oF 20.22
ORDER:
Sri B4jrang Singh Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
withdrawn. Thcre shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed
SD/. L.VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
/TTRUE COPY'/
SE TION OFFICER
'To,
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:2010112025
..-aa -a :>-
; ^- !.-
{
)
,)
21 i,,i 2t[5 >?a
.5
. ,).
:*.
L-]
...-.
ORDER
WP.No.4506 ot 2022
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
1d
@
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Meedikeri Venkataiah
The State of Telangana, rep., by the Commissioner, Telangana State Vaidya Vidhana Parishad
The Superintendent, District Hospital, Tandur
Sudhakar
Pulla Karthik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
