Writ petition sought a mandamus directing GHMC to act upon demolition/notices issued under Section 459 of the GHMC Act regarding premises No. 22-1-717/A. The petitioner did not appear despite listing for dismissal; the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3383 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETW
WRIT PETITION NO: 19800 OF 2015
Between:
Mir Baquar Hussain Razvi @ Parvez, S/o Late lqbal Ahmed Razvi aged about 59 years, Occ Business Rl/o H. No. 23-1-43215, Hussain Koti, Alijah Kotla, Hyderabad.
..PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring the inaction of the official respondents in implementing the notices No. 717 and 229.2006, No. 717lACP|C4IGHMC/2013 dt. 10.2.20'13 and 7.11.2013 issued under Sec. 459 of the GHMC Act, 1955 to the petitioner ie.., owner of a portion of premises bearing Municipal No.22'1717lA issued to the petitioner and Notice No. /ACP/C4IGHfUCl2O13 dt. 24.7.2013 issued to the petitioner/owner and occupier, inspite of legal notice cit. 26.8.2013 and representation dt. 23.3.2015 issued by the petitioner to implement the said notices as being illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutiona I and contrary to the GHMC Act, 1955.and consequently direct the official respondents to forthwith act
=F:7
upon the said notices and legal notice/repre sentatio n of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper rn the rircunrstances of the case.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2015(WP MP. NO:25562 oF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the . rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cour may be pleased to forthwith act upon notices No. 717 dt. 22.g.2006, No. 717tt cplcllcHlvc/2013 dt. 10.22013 and 7.11 .2013 issued under Sec. 459 of the lHlr/c Act, 1955 to the petitioner ie., owner of a portion of premises bearing \4unicipar No. 221717lA issued to the petitioner and Notice No. /ACp/c4lGHM( /2013 dt. 24 7.2013 issued to the petitioner/owner and occupier, pending dispo s rl of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.KARUNA SAGAR (Nor pRES :Nr)
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: SRI G.MADHUSUDHI N REDDy, SC FOR GHMC
The Court made the following: ORDER
JE+-=?5iEZ
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA AIISHETTY
WRIT PETITION No.198OO of 2O15
ORDER:
This writ petition is fi1ed seeking following relief: "Declaring the inaction of the official respondents in implementing the notices No-717 dated 22.09.2006, No.7 17 / ACP I C4 / GHMC I 20 | 13 dated lO.O2.2Ol3 arrd 07 .11.2013 issued under Section 459 of the GHMC Act, 1955 to the petitioner i.e., owner of the portion of premises bearing Municipal jno.22 I 717 lA issued to the petitioner/ olvner and occupier, inspite of legal notice dated 26.Oa.2O13 and rcpresentation dated 23.03-2015 issued by the petitioner to implement the said notices as being illegal, and contrary to the GHMC Act, 1955 and prays to direct the official respondents to fofthwith act upon the said notices and legal notice/representation of the petitioner." 2 No representation on behalf of the petitioner despite listing the
matter under the caption "For Dismissal". It appears that petitioner has no interest to pursue the matter.
No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand dismissed.
\
To,
Sd/.G.JYOTHI ISTAN T REGIS //TRUE COPY' SECTION OFFICER
. -'-5:"r-- -.*- _ _!. :.:ffi
I
l
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210912025
ORDER
WP.No.19800 of 2015
. ,,,,_, t:'...
. ),'
,\tt..
'.' t<br>'- il
l. B4 llc WI i: ll
\i. ^?,,j
-.,)
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
FOR NON.PROSECUTION,
WITHOUT COSTS (+
t)-t\r-</sup>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether GHMC's inaction in implementing notices issued under Section 459 of the GHMC Act was illegal.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mir Baquar Hussain Razvi @ Parvez
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Deputy Commissioner, GHMC Circle No. IV
The Assistant City Planner, GHMC Town Planning Section, Circle No. IV
Sri Mukthar Hussain
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
