Disposed

T.Anjaiah v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC12 Feb 2025WP/3983/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A retired headmaster sought release of his retirement benefits including gratuity, commutation, leave encashment and provident fund withheld since his June 2024 retirement. The respondents said bills were processed but funds were short. The court disposed of the writ petition directing release within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to release specified gratuity, commutation, leave encashment and provident fund amounts preferably within eight weeks; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

T.Anjaiah Vs The State of Telangana — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^3s04 I

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY,THE^{TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYFIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPURAJESHWAR RAO}

¶6

RIT P TITI N 983 F 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

T'Aniaiah,S/o'T'Limbaiah,age'62years,Retd.HeadMasterGr.ll,Z-P.High ifi,j"i, irrIJox"rlig"ilsi,.ita,^{Rajanna.SilciflaDist. R/o. H.No. 1-55,Post} and Vilqe onrr*iil]r"-konirioi"i^{trleruqRajannasircilla District.} tppo.Noloz-000552/5P)^{(PPO.lD.No.14100887)}

¶9

...PETtTtONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State^of Telangana,^{rept. by its Pfincipal Secr:et?ry,Finance Department} Secretariat,^HYderdbad.

¶12

2 The State of Telangana,^{rept by its PrincipalSecretary, SchoolEducation} Departriient,^{Secrelariat,Hyderabad.}

¶13

a The Director of^{Treasuriesand Accounts, Government of Telangana'} lnsurance^{auildings,Abids'Hyderabad}

¶14

¶15

¶16

The^{DistrictTreasury Officer, Rajanna Sircilla Eistrict at Eirpilla'}

¶17

The Sub Treasury^{Officer, Sircilla, Rajanna Sircilla Distript'}

¶18

...RE9PONDENTS

¶19

Petition under^{Article226 of the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances^{statedin the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be} oleasedtoissueanorderordirectionorwrit,moreparticularlyone!nthenatureof ft;ffi'rtrr"orrrt^{Jeclarethe impugnedactionof the rqspg4ents in} .not ;;il;s il;i"t""r"nilp"nEionarv^{beiefit: s-u!h} ^as^{Gratuitv (TS) amou4t of} n"eoa2sg /-^{with roken No 2;22801705, DT 289'2024and Gratuitv(Q-s)} ,rount of Rs^12,91 ,7611-^{with Token No 2522801698} 9t:'^2892024' Commutation^(TS) amount^{of Rs.4,42,400/- with Token No 2522801973'dt'} c6rr"rtrt."^{(CS) amount of Rs 18'54'0051 with rglgl iio} ilrr;i;;;i iiizaolsal, it^{ZA.S.ZOZI,Encashmentof Leaveamount of Rs. 12,25,009/- with} i"r", N".ZSZ2599286,^{DT. 69.2024, Z.p. Generat provident Fund amountpf} ilii;g^{;6-;-*,tn-c.p"-zszztostos,dt 18 s.2024 is ilegat, arbitrary,unfair,} unlust. discrimination,^{apart from violation of all the StatutoryRulesand} c.i".iitrti"""i'^{'prori.ion. and consequently direct the respondents tb release and}

¶20

'' pay the said pensionary benefits with interest @ 1B percentage per annum from date of retirement to till the date of actual^{paymentis made}

¶21

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶22

Petition under Sectton 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circtrmstahcesstatedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{HighCourt may} be^{pleased To} direct the respondent to release the^{retiremenupensionarJbenefits} such Aq Gratuity (TS) amount of Rs.3,08,239 /- with^Token [9.^{251e801795, DJ.} 29.92Q24 and Gratuity (CS) amount of Rq.^{12,91,761twithToken} tr,lp' 252280169:8 dl.28.9.2024, Commutation^(TS) amount of^Rs 4,42,400^{lwith Tqlgn} No 2522801973 dt^{28 9 2024 and Cornmutation (CS)} Amount^of Rs^18,54'Q0_01' with Tqken No. 2522801966, dt 28.9.2024, Encashmen!^of Leave ?moun!^of Bs. 12,25,009t- with Token No.2522599286, DT. 6.9.2024,^{Z.P. GeneJal} Provtdqnl Fund amount of Rs 9,70,776 I with C.No.2522709305, dt.^19.9.2Q24to the petitioner forthwith pending disposal of writ^petition

¶23

Counsgl for the Petitioner: SRl. C SAI REDDY

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,3 to 5: GP FOR^{FINANCEPLANNINq}

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR SCHOOL EEUCATION

¶26

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶27

, I

¶28

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAIESHWAR RAO

¶29

WRIT PETITION No.3983 OF 2025

¶30

ORDER

¶31

With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage.

¶32

Heard Mr.C.Sai Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Finance for respondent Nos.1, 3 to 5 and learned Government Pleader for School Education for respondent No.2

¶33

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner retired from service on 30.06.2024 and till now, his retirement benefits were not released by the respondents.

¶34

Learned Government Pleader submits that the bills pertaining to the retirement benefits of the petitioner are already processed. However, due to dearth of funds, the amounts could not be released to the petitioner on time. Learned Government Pleader further submits that as per seriatim of the token numbers, amounts will be released to the beneficiaries.

¶35

Having regard to the above submissions, this Writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to release Gratuity (TS) amount of Rs.3,08,239l- with Token No.2522801705, dated

¶36

¶37

28.09.2024, Gratuity (CS) amount of Rs.t2,91,761l-^{with Token} No.2522801698, dated 28.09.2024, Commutation^{(TS) amountof} Rs.4,42,400/- with Token No.2522801973, dated^28.09.2024, Commutation (CS) amount of Rs.18,54,005/-^{with Token} No.2522801966, dated 28.09.2024, Encashment of^{Leave amount} of Rs.12,25,009/- with Token^{No.2522599286,dated 06.09.2024,} ZP General Provident Fund amount of Rs.9,70,776/-^with C.No,2522709305, dated 18.09.2024,^{pertainingto the petitioner,} as expeditiously as^{possible,preferably within} a^{period of eight (8)} weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.^Thereshall be no order as to costs.

¶38

Miscellaneous^{petitions pending,} if any, shall stand^closed.

¶39

SD/-MOHDISMAIL

¶40

ASSISTANT REGI STRAR

¶41

//rRUE coPYtt

¶42

To, ( s CTION OFFICER

¶43

The Principal Secretary, Finance Department Secretariat,

¶44

z Hyderabad. IlEJrli:f"'^{secretaryschoor Education} oupr.trunt, secretariat,

¶45

J ilXi Bl{::'Btil I;?H,,:: i!id::B:!* Government or re,a nsa na,

¶46

54 The Sub Treasury The District Treasury Officer, Rajanna Sircilla Offrcer, Sircilla, Rajanna Sircitta District.District at Sircilla., o. One CQ to SRI. c SAI RE

¶47

7 iw* J",6;:iil:i:;ffi',: ffi co urr fo*h e sra,e of

¶48

It 33*:.llot3i;*"",^Education, Hish courr fsr thq gtare of retansana

¶49

9 Two CD Copies KKS BS ft^€.

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 210212025

ORDER

1 HE SrA I4i
t
v'
7
oo)q 0 7 tlAfi 2[25
.A.'
+
r.O
I ots.'^ra}l

¶55

WP.No.3983^{of 2025}

¶56

DISPOSING^{OF THE WRIT PETITION} WITHOUT^COSTS

¶57

?Aq. '6lA-s

T.Anjaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Anjaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Devadas ADC-E.No.-306716. Vs The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation(Tgsrtc)

Vemula.Damodar Reddy Vs The Sate of Telangna

K.Koteshwar Reddy Vs The Sate of Telangna

T.Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana

E.Veera Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Wahab Ahmed Vs The State of Telangana