Penuballi Suryam Vs State of Telangana

¶1

[^325s I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE^{TENTH DAY OF DECETVIBER} TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENTYFIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJU'STICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR}

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO:^{37016OF 2025}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Penuballi Suryam, S/o.^{Late Kannappa, Aged 54 years, Cast.bySheduled} friOe, Occ--'6uttivation,^{R/o.Kotha' Ginnelagudem Village, [t/ulakalampalli} tt/andal, Bhad radri Kothagudem^District.

¶9

2.^penuballi N/ladhu, S/o.^{Sriramulu,Aged 52 years, Occ-CultiyaJiol'R/o.Kotha} binn"figuOJ*^{-Viffrge,tr/ulakdlafipalli[t/andal, Bhadradri Kothagudem} District'

-.PET'a.NERS

AND

*f

State of Telanqana, Rep.by^{its Principal Secretaryto Government' Home} Department, Setretariat,^{Saifabad,Hyderabad}

¶14

Superintendent^{of Police, Bhadradri KothagudemDistrictat Kothagudem.}

¶15

Circle lnspector of^{Police, tt/ula(alampalli Circle, MulakalampalliVillageand} {tlandal, Bhad radri^{KothagudemDistrict.}

¶16

Sub - lnspector of Police,^{tt/ulakalampalliPolice Station,ttlulakalampalli} Village and' Mandal, Bhadradri^{Kothagudem District'}

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^{prayingthat in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be} pleased to issue a writ, order^{or direction moreparticularlyone in the natureof} WRIT OF IVIANDAIVIUS^{declaring the action of 3rd and 4th respondents in not} providing police aid on my^{representationdated22.11.2025 and also not} implementing Police^{Aid order granted on 06.02.2018in l.A.No. 57 of 2018 in} O.S.No.405 of 2016^{on the file of Sdb-DivisionalMagistrate(tMobileCourt)at} Bhadrachalam for harvesting^{my crops in my Iand of Ac. 10.42 cents andcovered} by RS Nos. 116t45^{and 11611t36situated in Rachannagudem Revenue Villageof} tvlulakalampalli Mandal,^{BhadradriKothagudemDistrict as illegal,irregular,}

¶19

irrational and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of^{lndia and} consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondent to implement said^{police aid} order.

¶20

lA NO: 1 oF 2025

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the^{circumstances stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleased to} direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to consider my representation^dated 22.11.2025 and implement the Police Aid Order^granted on 25.03.2O11^{in on} 06.02.2018 in l.A.No. 57 of 2018 in O.S.No.405 of 20'16 on the file^{of Sub-} Divisional Magistrate (tt/obile Court) at Bhadrachalam for harvesting my cropsⁱⁿ my land of Ac. 10.42 cents and covered by RS Nos. 116145 and¹ 1611136^situated in Rachannagudem Revenue Village of Mulakalampalli Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, pending disposal of the main writ^petition.

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI PANGA SIVANARAYANA

¶23

Counsel for the Respondents: ASST. GP FOR HOME

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

o

¶26

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELAITTGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶27

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

¶28

o.3 6 DATE OF ORDER: 10.lz.z0i?s

¶29

Between:

¶30

Penuballi Suryam and Another

¶31

...Petitioners

¶32

AND

¶33

{$' The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department secretariat, saifiabad, Hyderabad and B others

{'lr

...Respondents

o

Aggrieved by the action of respondent Nos.3 and 4 in not providing police Aid on the petitioner's representation dated 22'L1.2o25 and also not implementing porice Aid order granted on 06.02.2018 in I.A.No.S7 of 20rg in o.s.No.4o5 of 2016 on the Iile of learned Sub-Divisionar Magistrate (Mobile court) at

\

'\a

:
€4

2

Bhadrachatam for harvesting the^petitioners' crops in their land admeasuring Ac. lO-42 cents and were covered by RS.Nos.Il6/45 and 1 16 / L /36 (hereinafter referred as^{"subject property")} situated in Rachannagudem Revenue Village, Mulakalampalli Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District, the present writ petition is filed. A consequential prayer is sought to direct the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to implement the said Police Aid Order.

¶43

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner No.1 is in possession of the subject property and the said property belongs to their ancestors and the petitioner was in possession and cultivating the above subject properly without interruption by anyone at any point of time. It is further sr:bmitted that when the third parties and their henchmen interfered with the petitioner's possession in respect of the subject land, the petitioner filed o.S.No.405 of 2016 on the file of Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Mobile court) at Bhadrachalam for grant of permanent injunction restraining third parties and their henchmen not to interfere with the petitioner's possession. It is further submitted that during the pendency of the suit, the petitioner filed I.A.No.443 of 2oL6 in o.s.No-4o5 of 2ot6 for grant of temporary injunction. The sub-

{b c:!ri

3

\i

o

Divisional^{Magistrate &Special Assistant Agent to Government,} Mobile Court,^{Bhadrachalam (hereinafter referred as "trial court")} granted temporar5r^{injunction uide itsorder dated 20.09.2016} restraining^{the d.efend.antsand their henchmen not to interfere} with the^{peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitionerin} respect of the subject^{propertytitl further orders. Thereafter, the} petitioner filed application^{uide I.A.No.S7 of 2018 in I.A.No.443of} 2016 in O.S.No.4OS^{of 2016 seeking PoliceProtection in respectof} the subject^{property. The trialcourt uid.e itsord.er dated} 06.O2.2018^{directed the respond.ents} /defendants^{not to interfere} with the^{peacefulpossession.of the petitioner} /^{plaintiffand also} d.irected the^Police to^{provide police protectionin the schedule} property till further orders.^{It is further submittedthat the} petitioner made a^{representationto respondent No.4 requestingto} provide police^{protectionfor harvesting their crops and to comply} the orders of the trial^{court passed on 06.02.2018.It is further} submitted that though^{a representation was made to respondent} No.4, no action has^{been taken and no police protectionhas been} granted to the^petitioners.

I I l I

i.

4

(r;

-l

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.-l to 4 submitted that since the trial court has granted police prote-ption and a representation to that effect has been submitted by the petitioners on 22.11.2025, the respondent No.4 would consider the Same and grant police aid to the petitioners in respect of the subject property.

¶55

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

¶56

Recording the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, this. writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.11.2025 and take appropriate action in the light of the orders by the trial court in I.A.No.S7 of 2018 in I.A.No.443 of 2016 in o.S.No.4o5 of 2o16 on 06.09.2018.

¶57

with the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of with consent of learned counsel for the petitioner and. learned Assistant Government pleader for Home. There shall be no order k,v as to costs.

I'

5

/-]

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications if any^pending

¶62

in this petition, shall stand closed.

¶63

-4