Writ petition filed regarding inaction in sanctioning a bill was dismissed as infructuous after counsel for the petitioner submitted that the claimed relief was already granted.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t3437 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENW SECONDDAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CH]EFJUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICEG.RADHARANI
WRIT PETITION NO: 36823 OF2024
Between:
RAMASWAMY BHOOPAL REDDY, S/o. R SathiReddyAged About. 65 years, Occupation. Business No. 3-14-1241141Cn PloI No.14lC,Road No.6, Vivekanada Nagar Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad Telangana-500070
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriatewrit order or direction declaring the inaction of the RespondentsNo.2 to 5 in sanctioning the bill of Rs.'t ,99,900/-, asillegal arbitrary, contrary to the provisionsof the Representation ofpeoples Act,'1951 andviolative of Articles 14,19 and 300-4 of the constitution of lndia and consequentlydirect the Respondent No.2 to forthwith sanction the bill of Rs.1,99,900/-foruvardedby Respondent.5 vide C.No.'140/SHO- vLG/RCt</2023 dated 05112t2O23 and credit theamount to petitioner bank account along with 12percent interest from due date
/ /
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the Respondents No. 2 to sanction the bill of Rs.1,99,9001 submitted by Respondent-S vide C.No.140/SHO-VLG/RCK/2023 dated 05-12-2023 hire charges to the owner of RBR Function Hall, pending disposal of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. RAMAN GOUD
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI G. VEERAWAMY,
GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI MOHAMMED OMER,FAROOQ, GP FOR REVENUEJ'
Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: SRI MOHAMMED HUSSAIN,
GP FOR FINANCE AND PLANNING
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4&5: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
./.. ,.,
I
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI
WRIT PETITION No.36823 of 2o24
ORDER (Per Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice)
Sri G. Raman Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner, at
the outset, fairly submits that the relief clairned has been gralted
and the petition has rendered infructuous.
rendered infructuous. No costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stend I
ciosed.
I
SD/.T. JA SREE ASSISTANT RE ISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BM
BS
cAa
.,
HIGH GOURT
DATED:2210112025
-f
( ot H E Si4
/,
o (
'!t_ <br>? I ttt ?n?c
'.),? a
,
..t\r
ORDER
WP.No.36823 of2024
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTOUS WTHOUT COSTS
6rv9\ irt
RAMASWAMY BHOOPAL REDDY
State of Telangana
District Election Officer
District Treasury Officer
Deputy Commissioner of Police, Bhongir
Sub-Inspector of Police, Valigbnda
SUJOY PAUL
G. RADHARANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
