Dismissed¶51

D. Bala Mallaiah, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Jan 2025WP/11228/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, W.P. No. 11228 of 2018, D. Bala Mallaiah v. State of Telangana and others; Bench: Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul (author) and Dr. Justice G. Radha Rani; decided 22 January 2025. Petition under Article 226 for mandamus to release gratuity and life insurance amounts; interim application under Section 151 CPC. Dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission, no costs; pending interlocutory applications closed. No merits adjudication; no precedent discussed; no quantum stated.

What did the court decide?

None; writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no costs. ¶51

D. Bala Mallaiah, Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

t3437 |

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND^{DAY OF JANUARY} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY FIVE}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF^{JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL} AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 11228 OF²⁰¹⁸

¶8

Between:

¶9

D. Bala Mallaiah, S/o. Sailu,Aged about 62^years,Ry'd'. Mustiyala Village, Cheriyala Mandal, Siddipet District.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry Dairy Development and Fisheries Department, D Block, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.

¶13

The State of Andhra Pradesh Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry Dairy Development and Fisheries Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District,

¶14

The Telengana State Dairy Development Federation Co-Operation Limited, Lalapet, Hyderabad.

¶15

The Andhra Pradesh Dairy Development Federation Co-Operation Limited, Lalapeet, Hyderabad.

¶16

The Deputy Director, Warangal Milk Shed,^Warangal, Warangal District.

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ mor€ particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action. of the Respondents in not releasing the gratuity and insurance amounts to the Petitioner as wholly illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the Respondents to release the^gratuity and^life insurance amounts to the Petitioner,^pending disposal of Writ Pelition

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleasedto} direct the Respondents to release the^gratuity and^{life insuranceamounts to the} petitioner, pending disposal of writ petition

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G. RAVI MOHAN

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&2: GP FOR SERVICES^I

¶23

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.3&4: SRI^{B. RAJESHWARREDDY,} GP FOR ANDHRA PRADESH Counsel for the Respondent No.S: -

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

¶26

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL

¶27

AND

¶28

THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI

¶29

WRIT PETITION No.11228 of 2O18

¶30

OR.DER (Per Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice)

¶31

Sri G. Ravi Mohan, learned counsel for the^{petitioner,at}

¶32

the outset, submits that the petition has rendered infructuous'

¶33

Sri B. Rajeshwar Reddy, learned Governmerlt^{Pleader for}

¶34

Andhra Pradesh, for respondent Nos.3 and 4, has no objection.

¶35

o Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed having

¶36

rendered infructuous. No costs.

¶37

Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand

¶38

closed.

¶39

SD/.T. J REE ASSISTANT ISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

OneCCto SRl. G.^{RAVI MOHAN'Advocate} IOPUCI 2. Two CCs to GP FOR^{SERVICES I} ,High^{Court for the State ot lelangana aI} Hyderabad [OUTI s. rivo-Cbi io^'GP FoR^{ANDHRA PRADESH ,High courtfor the Stateof} Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies

BM BS

cxe

HIGH COURT"

DATED:2210112025

ORDER

l HE S{4
(o(
ot 2t rtg ZW t,
J\ t/
"t *
5,1.-;.y1f.O

¶50

WP.No.11228 of 2018

¶51

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS

¶52

Ott\t"

D. Bala Mallaiah, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D. Bala Mallaiah, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Nagori Vs Income Tax Officer

C. Latha Vs The State of Telangana

B Shivaji, Hyd Vs R. Naga Raju, Hyd and Another

Sved Basheer Ahmed Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Sangameshwara Rice Mill Vs The Telangana Pollution Control Board

Mekala Harshitha Vs the State of Telangana