Hearing the matter, the court found that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive, rendering it infructuous, and consequently dismissed the petition without costs.
Dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t33021
HrGHcouRr t?+11t": T BADOFTELANGANA (SpeciatOriginalJurisdictton )
FTH DAYOF JUNE THURSDAY,THETWE TWOTHOUSANDA D TWENTYFIVE
PRES NT
THE HONOURABLESRJUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION O:3 58 0F 2016
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
. Petition under Articlc 2)A nr ts^ circumstan;;; t#; i;,I"]"^319or'the constitutio ro rssue writ, or wrirr,'"iTd"it rir"o tt"i"rii,il""ri,$,'&3f#:? r"1 gJj; r11d,T,:l;;,"0r;;iil,r?3%"1-".'"1"fi ,T:J:,ir'[i"il:%teJi*{f m memo.No..r5444/Rean.11t;o!:-l ;,:;i;trtii r r"#rr"o by the Respondent No 3 to B' as i'egar, aibitrary- and against tn" -i in'"ipr", of naturar justice and consequentrv directing tne-ResponJEni N; ;;"r;;; .i fix a date for hearins of main appear and dispose as soon_as possibre "onruri"nirvoy the 1st Respondentand to pass such other order or orders that are ;;;; ,. fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
l.A. NO:1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 452 oF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the peiition, it" iigt, Court may L"-pr"".LJt" suspend -proceedings issued by the 1st Respondent-uio" memo.No 15444/Regn.11l2o1s-1 dt: 10.09.2015 and pass such' other ordei or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VSRMV PRASAD SANAKA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 to 8: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI E K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.3 8 0F 2016 ORDER:
Today, when the matter is en up for hearing the learned Counsel for petition would submit that the cause in the present Writ Pe on does not survive
and thereby the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
to costs.
any, shzrll stand closed.
D/- K.BHAVANISWAMY SISTANTREGISTRAR
il //TRUECO SECTIONOFFICER To, 1. One CC toSRl. VSRMV PRASAD SAN KA cate [OPUC] ourt forthe State of Telangana Two CCs toGP FOR REVENUE'High tourl 2 Two CDCoPies KKS LS
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 210612025
/../ r :r i 5i 1.17f
6
t
14 ltlB il6 C
-/.1 oi
:1j-;r-1.I!:
.i:-_: .=i. ,,io
ORDER
WP.No.358 of 2016
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M S Sreenaaya Chit Funds Pvt Ltd
The State of Telangana
The Dy. Registrar of Chits/Arbitrator, Ranga Reddy
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
