Mogulla Krishna Murthy, S/o. Late. Mogulla Venkata Narsaiah, v. State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary
Constitutional Law – Article 226 – Threatened dispossession by revenue authorities
Case brief
What is this about?
W.P. No. 9353 of 2017, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, decided 11-06-2025 by Justice K. Sarath. Mogulla Krishna Murthy v. State of Telangana, District Collector (Ranga Reddy) and Tahsildhar (Serilingampally). Article 226 mandamus; Section 151 CPC interlocutory application (WPMP No. 11587 of 2017); land of 402 sq. yards, Plot Nos. 20 and 21, Sy. Nos. 69 and 70, Gachibowli Village; threatened dispossession by revenue authorities without due process; interim orders since March 2017; no counter filed by respondents in over eight years; writ petition disposed of directing respondents not to interfere with petitioner's possession without following due process of law; no costs; miscellaneous applications closed.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's possession of the subject property (402 sq. yards, Plot Nos. 20 and 21, Sy. Nos. 69 and 70, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District) without following due process of law; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.