S. Nagasri Vs State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in transferring the Petitioner from Khammam Milk Shed (Kothagudem) to Mahaboobnagar Milk Shed is illegal arbitrary and against the Principles of Natural Justice and also declare the transfer order Proceedings No.557/Per.lllD2l2O17lVol.l dated14.11.2025 issued by the 2nd Respondent as illegal arbitrary and against the Principles of Natural Justice and set aside the transfer order No. 557lPer.lllD2l201 7/Vol.l dated 14.1 1 .2025 and also direct the Respondent No. 2 to continue the Petitioner at Khammam Milk Shed.

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the transfer order No. 557lPer.lllD2l2O17lVol.l dated14.11.2025 and also direct the Respondent No. 2 pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶20

lA NO: 3 OF 2025

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to consider and^pass a speaking order on the Petitioner's representation for cancellation of transfer, daled: 12.12.2025, and^permit the Petitioner to continue in her present posting at Kothagudem Milk Shed.

¶22

lA NO: 2 OF 2025

¶23

Between:

¶24

Telangana Diary Development. Co-operative Federation Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Lalapet Hyderabad.

¶25

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.2

¶26

AND

¶27

S. Nagasri D/o. Thirupathaiah, Age: 32 years, Occ: Lab Assistant, R/o. H. No.20-6-84001 2, Babuli Nagar, Bhadradri, Kothagudem District.

¶28

...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

¶29

State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶30

Deputy Director Khammam Milk Shed, Telanganna Diary Development, Cooperative Federation Ltd. Khamrnam.

¶31

(Respondents No.2 & 3 are not necessary parties to this Petition)

¶32

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS No.1 & 3

¶33

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the stay of the interim order daled 24.11.2025 in W.P.No. 35779 of 2025 passed by the Hon'ble High Court.

¶34

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. GlRl KRISHNA

¶35

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR SERVICES - Il

¶36

Counsel for the Respondents No.2 & 3: SRI B. BHARATH REDDY, S.C. FOR TELANGANA DIARY DEVELOPMENT, CO.OPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD.

¶37

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶38

r-'r

¶39

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶40

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶41

WRIT PETITION No.35779 of 2025

Date: 23.12.2025

B etwe e n:

S. Nagasri.

...Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangar-ra,

¶48

Rep. by its Principal Secretary,

¶49

Agriculture and Cooperation Department,

¶50

Secretariat, Hyderabad & ts,o others.

¶51

... Re s po nde nts

¶52

ORDER:

¶53

This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:-

¶54

"...please<l decl<u-uLg tle ectiot of resportdertNo.2 irr lrarsferrirtg rlte petitioner frolt Kltatnmott Mtlk Slrcd (Kothagudem) to Mahaboobnagor Mitk Shed as illegal, arbitrary and against the pinctples of ratural justice and also tleclqre the trortsfer order Proceedings No.557/ Per. ll/ D2/ 2O 1 7/ Vol. l dqted 1 4. 1 1.2025 issued by respondeti No.2 as illegal, arbitrorg attcl ogairtst the pritrciples of natural justice and set oside the transfer order No.557/ Per.II/ D2/2017/Vol.l rlated 14.11.2025 and crlso clirect respottcletrt No.2 to conttnue tle petitioter at Khannmam Milk Shed. . . "

¶55

Heard Sri P.Giri Krishna, Iearned counsei for the

¶56

petitioner; learned^(lovernnrenl Pleader for Services II appe:rring for respondent No.l, and Sri B.Bharath Reddy, learned Stancling

¶57

Counsel for Dain' Development Cooperative Federation Limited, appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3. With their consent, the \,rit petition is taken uip lor disposal at adrnission stage.

¶58

Learned counscl for thc petitioner submits that the pettttoner n as appointcd and posted as Lab Assistant on lO . 12.20 1 9 at Kham mam . Thereafter, shc u'as transferred to Kothagudem l,Iilk Shcd on 21.12.2024. and u'hile working as such. resporrdent No.2 issued the impuened proceedings dated 14.71.2025, transferring the petitioner. in the middle ol the academic ]/ear. to Mahabubnaqar Milk Shecl, u'hich is about (4 0O) km s au a. from l(othagudem, ancl the same is wholly illegal, arbitrarv and violatir.e of principles of natural justice. As subh, thc petitioner submitted her representatioll to respondent No.2 on 12.12.2025, requesting her retention at Kothagudem BMCU. Hou,ever, no action has been taken thereon so far Therefore, learned counsel prays this Court to direct respondent No.2 to consider the same and pass necessary orders within a timeframe as malr be stipulated b1- this Court

¶59

Learned Standing Counsel appearing lor respondent Nos.2 and 3, on filing of counter-affidavit, submits that the Inspection Team of Head Office have visited Khammam Milk Shed,

3

il

I

Khammam, on O4. 1O.2025, and submitted a report stating the availabilitl' of a huge manpo\'er for meager levels of procurement and sales, r.r'h icl-r is cattsing heav-v financial burclen to the Federation. As suctr, it r.r,as proposed to operate Kl-rammam i\4ilk Shecl in Operation;rl and Maintenance and also proposed to shilt three ernplovees, including the petitioner herein, u,ho has been translerred to Mahabubnagar Milk Shed. Likervise, the other ts'o inclrviduals. viz., P. Anitha Kumari and B. Srilatha, u,ere also translbrred to other places. [t is further submitted that the alorcsi cl ts'o em plor-ccs have submiLted their representations, rvhich are under consideral-ion. Hence, it is fairly submitted that resl;ondent authorities will also examine the petitior-rer's represcntation clated 12.12.2025, and pass appropriate orders in accordar-rce s'ith law.

¶64

Having considered the submissions made by the respective parties, this Writ Petition is clisposc'd of directing the respondcr-rt authorities to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.12.2025, and pass applopliate orders thereon, stricth.' tn accordance with lau,, AS cxpeclitiously S possible, prcferably within a period of four (04) r'r,eeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and communicate a copy thereof to the

¶65

I

¶66

petlttoner. Till such time, the interim order earlier granted by this Cor-rrt shall continue.

¶67