Petition ur)der Article 226 of the Conslitutiqn of lndia prayilg that in the circumslances s atecl in the affidavil filed therewith, lhe High eourt may be pleased to issrre Wrrt of Mandamus or any gther appfopriate ,y'r'rit or OrOe, or '. : :" ' 'l Directiqn declaring ,-',' (1) the action of r he ' st Respondent i;r paq al?e r!9 olg Qt, d?led 27.o4.1 024 ue ry tf th€ Oider rn Form-GS 14 yd ,he Proceedi a ngs, dal3d ?7.042024, leyying J i under SGST/Qc{iT pnd pen?lty under Secti9q i'3(10) of lhe SGST/QGST Acr 2qi7, wit ho.,L! even issuing FatrD GSTDRC-Q1A ar cor)remplated under Rufq 142(1A) of:t ', thq Ruleq Qp17, withoul signatulg in the Orde-s and Show Cause NQlice,' wlt!.g,ut Qll! tn fhe O;{er, tfrg Summ4ryof ther,)rder, for the tat period ?918..'l 9 uggler tlre SGSI/C9ST Ac.! ?017, ES arbitran/, contrary lo the provigjoNS Qfths 5651/CtigT Acr 2017, patently barred b,r linrilation, wilhgql .1p1;.6 igtion as pgr Sgctiorr 73(10) of the SGST/QGST Art 2017. more partiqularlv Q o,Ms .ry.g.t tE, dateg 2tr,98 2Q?g i.sSued Py the 3rcl Ilespondent and the Notificalion N o.Q$/2023=Cer)lra! TAx, dEled 28 12 2023, issuej b,r' the 4th Rgsponf,g4 t a1d tl1.g G.O.Ms Na.'170, dateq ?9122Q23 is5uedby the 3rd Respo4 dent, e,,JLendipS tQ.q limitalion qgJioQ !o mq[g lhe assgsspgnt, as illegal, ullra vires to Seetion 1686 of lhe SGSUCGST Aqr ?017aqO contraryto Articlg 14, 19(1Xg) and ?"9" 5 qJ the Qonslifqtio4 qf tndig, !?)GQMs.Nolte,dated25.08.?a?3 aod "G.Q.ftls.|Xe. t zo, da1efl 3Q.12 ?Q?1 iSgped by the Gove rnment of Telangana ag$ fhe potifiBptio4 fr,lo. 56f; 029:Ceqg19! daled ?8 12 2J23, issued by the 4th'[gsp opden.t'Bs qltra viies tq Secriqg lfsAo1 the scs-r/'i GST Act 2017 and con$equently sgt aside the Ordgr, daled ?7.0a.,292q'{he Surnmary of the Ordgr in Fqlm qST c-02, o aled 27.84.20.2 Qldthe Proceedingr;,dated 27.04.2024, passed by ttre ]i Regpondtl 1t, fg1 the tg; per!od 2018-1 I und€ r lhe SGST/CGST Act 2O17 , as null and void