Disposing a writ petition challenging registration proceedings directing the petitioner to approach a forum, the court granted liberty to approach the competent Civil Court for redressal without adjudicating merits.
Writ petition disposed by granting liberty to approach competent Civil Court for redressal of grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTHDAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 34449OF 2025
Between:
Sri Vaishnava Seva Sangam,(Regd.No.81 38/1 999), Ro-a-d N9. 5, rapuri Cotony, L.B. Nagar, Hyd?rabhd--500074, Be.p.by its Member,D. -ChandSgfPqJf,, S/o t-dt'e D. Krishinama-Chary,Aged about.54 years,Occ.Business, R/o Villa No. 1, Plot No. 1601, Sri-VishnuGrand Vista, Pragathinagar,nizampet, Medchal-Malkajgiri, District
...'ET'T.ONER
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue an Order, Direction orWrit more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaringthe action of the 3rd Respondentin issuanceof the proceedings Lr.No. 482lHydtROl2O25 dated.3010912025 by saving that on the allegations made againstRespondentNo. 4 Trust,askingthe petitionerto approach the concerned authority/Forum for redressalof the grievance as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional,violation,of the principles of the naturaljustice null and void and consequently directthe Respondent No. 3 to considerthe representation dated. 2gt}gt2}25 of thepetitioner and enquireinto the allegations by initiating appropriate action as Perlaw.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 to take appropriate action against the Respondent No. 4 TRUST by enquiring into the allegations asper lawpending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counselfor the Petitioner: SRI K.LAKSHMI MANOHAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 3: SMT. S.SRAVANTHI, AGP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION Counselfor the Respondent No.4: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
U/RIT PETITION No.34449 OF 2025
ORDER: a
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Smt. S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and perused the material on record. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.
2
SI(,J W.P.No.34449 of 2025 in Lr.No.4B2 lHydlRO 12025, dated 30.09.2025 directing the petitioner to approach the relevant Forum for redressal of his grievance. Without approaching competent Civil Court with regard to the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent No.4, the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition and the sarne is not maintainabie.
3
SK,J W.P.No.34449 of 2025
\
Sd/.P.PONNA SISTANT //TRUE COPY/ OFFICER To 1 ep Secretariat, 2 3. 4 5 N,H Court for the 6. Two CD CoPies PSK/PMK
&,
I
HIGH COURT
DATED i1311112025
ORDER
WP.No.34449 of 2025
S
1
() 1 1 ltt 1$l$
*
-tt
l,'r
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
<br>
1 issue framed by the court
whether the writ petition challenging the issuance of proceedings directing the petitioner to approach a forum for redressal is maintainable
Sri Vaishnava Seva Sangam
The State of Telangana
District Registrar
Joint Sub-Registrar
SVS Public Charitable Trust
K. SARATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
