Disposed¶4

M/s. Spoorthy Constructions v. Union of India

Telangana HC3 Dec 2025WP/34072/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Petition No.25915 of 2024, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad; order dated 27.04.2026 by NBK, J; part-heard hearing; petitioner's counsel relied on Viraj Chetaj Shah v. Union of India, 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 1195; time sought to produce a recent Supreme Court judgment said to squarely cover the writ petition; Special Public Prosecutor for CBI appeared; matter posted to 22.06.2026 under caption 'part heard'; footnote citation 2026 SCC OnLine Del 1233; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Time granted to produce a recent Supreme Court judgment; matter posted to 22.06.2026 under the caption 'part heard'. ¶4

M/s. Spoorthy Constructions Vs Union of India — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MAIN CASE No. Writ Petition No.25915 of 2024

¶4

DATE	ORDER	OFFICE NOTE
27.04.2026	NBK, J
	Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI. Learned counsel for the petitioner in support of her contentions, would rely on a judgment of the High Court of Bombay in**Viraj Chetaj Shah v. Union of India1.She would further rely on paragraph Nos.77, 78, 80 and 81 of the judgment of High Court of Delhi in Dr.Prannoy Roy and another v. Union of India2.**	Transferred to i-order before corrections
	Learned counsel prays for time to produce recent judgment of the Hon’ble
	Supreme Court by which judgment, the present writ petition is squarely covered. Post the matter on 22.06.2026 under the caption ‘part heard.’
	_________ NBK, J mrm

¶5

1 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 1195

¶6

2 2026 SCC OnLine Del 1233

M/s. Spoorthy Constructions v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Spoorthy Constructions v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Cases cited

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Korukonda Venkata Surya Rajeev Mohan Vs Union of India

Narsimha Reddy Vitta Vs The Union of India

Awar Naveen Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. Anumulapalli Harikishan Vs Union of India

Jetti Ankineedu Prasad Vs The State of Telangana

Chikka Raghunandan Vs The Union of India