A writ petition seeking quashing of a Labour Court order was withdrawn after settlement between the petitioner and the employer respondents; dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
Writ petition withdrawn at petitioner's request following settlement; dismissed as withdrawn, no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132521
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 33664 OF 2023
Between:
Taneti Prasanna Kumar, S/o. Anthony Occ. Operator Cloth Winding, Aged about 44 years, R:/o. H. No.2-14, Kondamadugu(V), Bibinagar(M), Yadradri Bhongir District.
..,PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances slated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the'tst Respondent Tribunal andquash the impugned order Dt17-0.1-2023passed in lA No.05/2022 in lD No.13/2021passed by the 1"t Respondent Tribunal.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CFCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the order DL.17-O1-2O23passed in lA No.05/2022 in lD l,lo.13/2021 by
the 1st Respondent Tribunalpending disposalof the abovev/r t Petitionand pass such other orders as arejust and necessary in the circum';lrncesof the case, otherwise the Petitioner shallsuffer irreparable loss and iniury.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRIM. V. RAJ KUMAR GABRIEL
Counsel for the Respondent No.l:GP FOR LABOUR
Counsel forthe RespondentNos.2and 3: SRI SRIKANTH HARIHARAN
The Court made the following: ORDER
:r
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLINANDA T PETI 40F
ORDER:
Sri M.V. Rajkumar Gabriel,learned counsel appearing on behalf of thepetitioner, seeksleave of this Courtto withdraw thepresent writpetition in view of the settlement arrived at between thepetitioner and Respondent Nos.2 and 3, and, to that effect, addressed aletter dated 22.07.2025 to the Registrar(Judicial),High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad.
As a sequel, the miscellaneouspetitions, ifany,
pending in the Writ Petition shall also stqndqlosed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. AHM D ABDULLAH KHAN STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri M. V. Raj KumarGabriel, Advocate oPUCI 2. OneCC to Sri Srikanth Hariharan,Advocate [OPU C I 3. TwoCD Copies TLSJ +tu
HIGH COURT
DATED:1410812025
,''
- ..t, j I]LJ
ORDER
WP.No.33664 of 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS I/' THDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
@
L) 1 )/
9
Taneti Prasanna Kumar
The Honourable Presiding Officer, Labour Court-III, Hyderabad
The Management of M/s. Mikroflo Pvt. Ltd. (Hyderabad)
The Management of M/s. Mikroflo Pvt. Ltd. (Vijayawada)
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
