Disposed

Dasari Rameh v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC6 Feb 2025WP/3346/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Retired School Assistant's gratuity, commutation and leave encashment bills were processed but unpaid due to dearth of funds. Court directed respondents to release all five retirement benefit amounts within eight weeks, with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to release specified retirement benefit amounts (gratuity, commutation, leave encashment) within eight weeks; no costs.

Dasari Rameh Vs The State of Telangana — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰⁴ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 3346 oF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Dasari Rameh, S/o. Ramchandram, aqe.61 years, Retd. School Assistant (S-ggal .Stugies)r M.?.U S.: Gorrepatty, Mattapui Mandal, Jagityal District. Rl/o. H.NO. 1-4-193/'111, Govindagiri Nagai, Koratia, Jagityal Distiicf.

¶9

...PE.TITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, rept. by its Spl. Chief Secretary, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

2, The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Inrurri"" Build ing, Abids, Hyderabad.

¶13

The District Treasury Officer, Jagitial, Jagitial District.

¶14

The Sub-Treasury Officer, Metpally, Jagitial District.

¶15

The District Educational Officer, Jagitial, Jagitial District.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declare the impugned action of the respondents in not releasing and paying the Gratuity (TS) amount of Rs.6,13,3941 with Token No. 2523584735 and Gratuity (CS) amount of rs. 9,05,837^ with Token No. 2523584733, Commutation (TS) amount of Rs. S,7'l ,291t- with Token No. 2523584731 and Commutation (CS) amount of Rs.8,43,684/- with Token No. 2523584736 and Final Encashment of Leave/HPL amount of Rs. 4,85,661 with Token No. 2522768131 , dt. 24.9.2024 is illegal, arbitrary, unfair, unjust, discrimination, apart from violation of all the statutory Rules and constitutional provisions and consequently direct the respondents to release and pay Gratuity

¶18

(TS) amount of Rs.6,'13,394/-^{with Token No' 2523584735 and Gratuity(CS)} amount of Rs.^{9,05,8371with Token No' 2523584733' Commutation(TS)} amountofRs.5,71,297t-withTokenNo'2523584731andCommutation(CS) amount of^{Rs.8,43,684! with TokenNo 2523584736and Final Encashment of} Leave/HPL amount^{of Rs. 4,85,661 with Token No' 2522768131} '^{dI 24 9 2024} withinterest@24%perannumfromdateofretirementtotillthedateofactual payment is made.

¶19

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶20

Petition under^{Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit^{filed in supportof the petition,the High court maybe pleasedto} direct the^{respondents to release and pay the Gratuity (TS) amountof} Rs,6,13,394/-with^{Token No. 2523584735and Gratuity (CS) amount of Rs,} 9,05,837/- with^{TokenNo. 2523584733, Commutation(TS) amouni of Rs'} 5,71,2g7 l-^{,lith Token No. 2523584731and Commutation(CS) amount of} Rs.8,43,684/-rrtithTokenNo.2523534T36andFinalEncashmentofLeave/HPL amount of Rs^{4.85,661 with Token No 2522768131} '^{d|2492024to the} petitioner forthwith^{forthwith pending disposal of mainwrit petition'}

¶21

Counsel for^{the Petitioner:SRI P.UGENDER REDDY}

¶22

Counsel for^{the Respondent No.1 to 4: GP FOR FINANCE}

¶23

Counsel for the^{Respondent No.5: GPFOR EDUCATION}

¶24

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶25

I I

¶26

-7

¶27

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO - WRIT PETITION No.3345 oF 2025

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

With the consent of both the parties, this Writ petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage.

¶30

\ \

¶31

Heard Mr.P.Ugender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government pleader For Finance for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and learned Government pleader for Education, for respondent No.5.

¶32

3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner retired from service on 31.08.2024 and till now, his retirement benefits were not released by the respondents.

¶33

Learned Government pleader submits that the bills pertaining to the retirement benefits of the petitioner are already processed. However, due to dearth of funds, the amounts courd not be released to the petitioner on time. Learned Government preader further submits that as per seriatim of the token numbers, amounts will be released to the beneficiaries.

¶34

5 Having regard to the above submissions, this Writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to release Gratuity (TS) amount of Rs.6,13,394/- with Token No.2523584735, cratuity (CS)

¶35

¶36

amount of Rs.9,05,837/-^{with Token No.2523584733, Commutation} (TS) amount of Rs.5,71,297/- with Token^{No.2523584731and} Commutation (CS) amount^{ofRs.8,43,684/-with Token} No.2523584736, Final^{EncashmentofLeave/HPL amount of} Rs.4,85,661/- with Token^{No.2522768131dated24.O9.2024,} pertaining to the petitioner, as expeditiously^{as possible, preferably} within a^period of eight^{(8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy} of this order.^{There shall be no order as to costs.}

¶37

Miscellaneous^{petitions pending,if any, shall standclosed.}

¶38

SD/. L. LAKSHMI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY//

ION OFFICER

To,

1 The Spl. Chief Secretary, Finance^{and Planning Department,Secretariat,} Hyderabad. State of Telangana.

¶44

¶45

2 The Director of Treasuries and^{Accounts, lnsurance Building, Abids,} Hyderabad.

¶46

3 The District Treasury Officer,^Jagitial ,^{JagitialDistrict.}

¶47

4 The Sub-Treasury Officer,^{Metpally,JagitialDistrict.}

¶48

5 The District Educational Officer,^{Jagitial, JagitialDistrict.}

¶49

6 One CC to SRI P.UGENDER^{REDDY,Advocate'[OPUC]}

¶50

7 Two CCs to GP FOR FINANCE,^{High Court for the Stateof Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶51

8 Two CCs to GP FOR EDUCATION,^{High Court for the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶52

I Two CD Copies BSR GJP ?)/t\

¶53

HIGH COURT

¶54

DATED: 0610212025

¶55

t' ,r Jlntr: a,
(
/"'' (._,
:-
1l ti'l ?t[i
e.
i
DEStrii

¶56

ORDER

¶57

WP.No.3346 of 2025

¶58

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION,

¶59

WITHOUT COSTS

¶60

@c"r4
.K
t,1

Dasari Rameh v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dasari Rameh v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prof. K. S. Sudheer Reddy Vs Osmania University

M. Chandra Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Abdul Zameer Vs The State of Telangana

Anagoni Rajesh Vs The District Collector

Dr. Y Hari Krishan Vs State of Telangana

D.Bixam Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others