had no subsisting rights. Despite this, respondent Nos.4 and 5 instituted O.S. No.l27 of 2025 only in respect of Acs.4.0O in Sy.Nos. 7OlAl1 and 7O/A/2, wherein the petitioner is shown merely as the southern boundary holder, clearly demonstrating that his land to an extent of Acs.3.00 is distinct and not the subject matter of the said suit or the ad-interim injunction granted therein. Notwithstanding the final Lok Adalat Award, the agriculturist certificate issued to the petitioner in 2016 and the fact that Sy.No.7O/A is not included in the prohibited list, the third respondent has illegally refused to transfer patta in the petitioner's name, citing the injunction in O.S.No.l27 of 2025, which has no application to the petitioner's land. Such refusal, influenced by the unwarranted objections of respondent Nos.4 and 5 who have neither right nor possession over the petitioner's land, is arbitrary, contrary to record, violative of principles of natural justice and has left the petitioner with no efficacious alternative remedy except to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Hon'lcle Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
