Writ petition sought a direction to process the petitioner's F-line mutation application based on an unregistered sale deed. The Government Pleader stated no provision exists for mutation on unregistered documents via Dharani. The court found no merit and dismissed the petition, leaving the petitioner free to seek other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
!
[32ee ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
t\ilONDAY, THE FIRST DAYOF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION NO:, 14403 OF 2023
Between:
l.Gooari Ramesh, S/olate Gopari Bhumaiah, aged about' 38 yrs'Occ' Agri6ulture ilo 11-2-284,Kanteshwar'Nizamabad
...'ET'T.ONER
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition underArticle226 of the constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriatewrit, order or directionsmore particularlyone in the nature of writof Mandamus declaringthe inaction of the 4th respondent in consideringtheapplicationofthepetitionervideFLinepetitionNo. TTDER0223OO91531Odt.01.04.2023 for mutation of petitioners name in Revenue recordsbasing upon un registered sale deed (sadaBinama)in respect oflandinSyNo.324extentAcls.00gtsSitautedatGupanpallyvillageShivar' mandal and DistNizamabad and Sy No. 3,19/AAadmeasuringto an extent of Ac 0.02gtssitautedatGupanpallyvillageshivar,mandalandDistNizamabadas illegal, void arbitraryand-violative of Art 14, 21 and 300Aof constitutionof lndia and consequentlyissue directions to respondentsto processthe application of thepetitionersFLinepetitionNo.TTDERo223oo915310dt.01.04.2023for mutation ofpetitioners name in Revenue records'
lA NO: 1 oF .2023
Petitior under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to process the application of the petitioners F Line petition No: TTDER022300915310 dt: 01 .04.2023 for mutation of petitioners name in Revenue records.
lA NO: 2 oF 2t023
Petitiorr under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to amend the extent of land ln Sy. No: 324 as Ac.0.18 gts instead of Ac. 1g.00 gts in Memorandum of writ petition and the writ affidavit.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T.V.KALYAN STNGH
Counsel for tlre Respondents: AGp FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
i 4 i ,l t I l; I
I I i I I j
IN THE HIGH COURT F.OR THE STATE OF TELAI{GANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION o. t44O3 of 2o.23 DATE OF ORDER: OL.L2.2O25
Between:
Gopari Ramesh
...Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and three others
...Respondents
ORDER:
Aggrieved by the inaction ofrespondent No.4 in consideringthe petitioner's F-line application bearing No.TTDERO2230O9153 10, dated O1.O4.2O23 for mutation of petitioner's name inrevenue records basing upon an un-registeredsale deed(Sadabainama)in respect of land in Survey No.324 to an extent of Ac.18-00guntas and in Survey No.3lgl AA to an extent of Ac.O-O2 guntas situated atGupanpally
2
Village Shivar, Nizamabad District, the present writ petition is filed. A consequential prayer is sought to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's F-line application for mutation of his name in the revenue records pertaining to the aforesaid extents of land.
2- Heard Mr. T.V.Kalyan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue apllearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
If
3
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications if any pending, in this petition, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY/
To 1. One CC to SRI T.V.KALYAN STNGH Advocate 2. Two CCs to GP for REVENUE High Court for Hyderabad. IOUTI 3 Two CD Copies PSK./MP
sd/- A. STANT RE OFFICER of Telangana, at
%
l
/
/
HIGH CC)URT
DATED:011121202s
ORDER
WP.No.1,l4El ot 2023
t THE S
(J 1 t t.lAfl 2026
-
-
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS
3t
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tahsildar's inaction on the petitioner's F-line application for mutation of his name in revenue records based on an unregistered sale deed (Sadabainama) was illegal.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Gopari Ramesh
State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue
District Collector, Nizamabad
Revenue Divisional Officer, Nizamabad Division
Tahsildar, Nizamabad Rural, Dist Nizamabad
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
