Dismissed¶30

Shaik Madar v. The State Telangana

Telangana HC30 Jan 2025WP/3233/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal as withdrawn; writ petition under Article 226; State of Telangana Social Welfare Department; retired District Social Welfare Officer; terminal benefits; three annual grade increments with cumulative effect; Memo No. 3B79/SCD.Ser.A2l2018-1 dated 04.12.2018; proceedings of 3rd Respondent dt.03/10/2018; claimed interest @18%; notional promotion; Section 151 CPC miscellaneous applications for change of counsel; no costs; no case law discussed.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed. ¶30

Shaik Madar Vs The State Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH^{DAY OF JANUARY} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICEPULLA KARTHIK}

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 3233^{OF 2020}

¶7

Between:

¶8

shaik fi/adar, S/o. tr/astan,^{Aged about 71 Years,Occ:. District Socialwelfare} offa;,^(R;idi, office of^{the DEputy Directorof SocialWelfare, Hyderabad'}

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State Telangana, Rep.^{by its Secretary, SocialWelfareDepartment,} Secretariat Buildings,^Hyderabad.

¶12

2 The Director & Commissioner^{of SocialWelfare, Telugu Samkshama Bhavan,} Masab Tank, Hyderabad.

¶13

3 Deputy Director, S.C. Development^{Department, Hyderabad'}

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of^{the constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in^{the affidavit filed therewith,the High court maybe} pleased to issue a wrrt, order or direction^{more particularlyone rn the natuleof} writ of Mandamus⁽ⁱ⁾ by^{calting for the records relating to connected with[,4emo} No.3B79/SCD.Ser.A2l2018-1^{dt. 04.12.2018and set aside the same holdingit} absolutely illegal, arbitrary,^{uncon stitutionaI and directs the Respondentsto} release the balance of terminal^{benefits pursuantto restorationof three annual} grade increments which was imposed^{withcumulative effect videproceedings} it.ZO. t t. t^ggz along with^{interest'@18% (ii) and directsthe Respondents to grant} notional^promotionlo the^{Petitioner along with all other benefits in the interestof} justice.

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶17

Petition under section 15'l^{cPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High court maybe pleasedto} directs the Respondents to^{releaseforthwith balanceof terminal benefitson} restoration of three annual^{gradeincrementswithcumulative effectas per the} proceedings ofthe 3rd Respondent dt.03/10/2018^{in the interest of justice.}

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to PERMIT the Petitioner to replace the Vakalath of Sri PRATAP NARAYAN SANGHI-987, Advocate as the Counsel for the Petitioner herein in the above W.P. No. 3233 of 2020 by^permitting the Petitioner herein to engage Sri R PRABHAKAR-21071 as Counsel for the Petitioner before this Honble Court.

¶20

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to permit the petitioner to replace the present Counsel for the Petitioner in the above W.P No 3233 of 2020 by permitting the^petitioner herein to engage Sri R Prabhakar-21071 as Counsel for the Petitioner before this Honourable Court.

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R. PRABHAKAR

¶23

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

¶26

THE TION'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶27

W.P.No .3233 of 2o20

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permrssron of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.

¶30

Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶31

SD/. L. LAKSHMI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶32

//TRUE COPY//

¶33

SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . One CC to SRI R. PRABHAKAR , Advocate [OPUC 2. fwo CCs to GP FOR SOCTAL WELFARE, Hiqh Co urt for the State of Tela ngana. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies BN GJP (p-

HIGH COURT

DATED:3010112025

ORDER

WP.No.3233 of 2020

S T A t
.(
(
,l
1t?5
2[ -i.I ,/it
I,/1/
, aJ r

¶39

DISMISSING BOTH THE WRIT PETITIONS AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS