The court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner failed to submit the online application and relevant documents as directed by a previous order in a related writ petition, rendering the current challenge premature and uncognizable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3168 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
IVONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 30012 oF 2025
Between:
Ta ng,adapa lly -Shan kar @ Shankaraiah,S/o Late TangadapallyRamaiah, 4gedabout 55 years,Occ Agricutture, Rl/o H.No.13_i13l. Bhaovanaoa, L:olony, Shadnagar Division.. Farooqnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy-'District. Pincode - 509216, (T G. State)
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of rhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in ,-' considering the Representations dated 0110912025, for illegal interference by unofficial Respondent Nos. 5 & 6 and their henchmen, who are trying to dispossess the Petitioner from his peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioner Agricultural
lands admeasuring tr an extent of Ac.5-22 Guntas in iy.No.39, situated at Nagulapally Village of Farooqnagar lvlandal, Mahbubnaq'r District (now Ranga Reddy District), Telangana State which the same ha,; beerr purchased by Petitioner's father who died intestate, leaving behind l': Petitioner and his brothers despite har, rng made Representation dated t 0912025, to not to dispossess or vacate the Petitioner from hrs Agriculture : rds, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstrtutional is clear violatron i' fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 11, 19 & 21 of Constitution of lr lia and in violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Re: condents to forthwith consider the Representation dated 0110912025 to not i: interfere, to not to dispossess or vacate the Petitioner from his peaceful pos: r ssion and enjoyment of Agriculture lands, by unofficial Respondents No.5 and 6 ,r rd their henchmen, in respect of Agriculture iand admeasuring to an extent ) Ac.5-22 Guntas in Sy.No.39, situated at \agulapally Village of Farooqnagar ,, andal, tvlahbubnagar District (now Ranga Reddy District), Telangana Stirrr by disposing the Representation dated 01/09/2025, in accordance to law
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the crr ;umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High CoLr. may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith consider the Repres'r rtation dated 0.1 -092025 to not to intedere, to not to dispossess or vacate |r, petitioner from his peaceful possession and enjoyment of Agriculture lan j ; stated supra,. by unofficial Respondent Nos.5 & 6 and their henchmen, irr accordance to law; Pending disposal of the above Wrrt Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRt BOLLU NAGARAJU
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: SRI L. RAVINDER, q,Gp FOR
REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 & 6: -----
The Court made the following: ORDER
1'TIIi HON'BLE SIII.'USTICI' K. LAKSHMAN
WRI'l- PEl.l'l'lON No.30012 of 2025
OR;\1. ORI)ER:
Ilcaril lcamed counscl tirr- thc petitiotlerancl N{r.L.ttavinclcr, leamccl ;\ssistant(loventrttent Pleaderlirr Revcrtuc
a \ccording to the pctitioncr. his titthcr, nantely, late Sri -f angadapu lly' Ramarah \'as the absolrrte (lrvtter attcl possessor ol' lancl arlnrcasuring Acs.-5.22gunta s It) Sy.No.39, situated at Nasulapallv Village. liarooclnagar Manclal,Mahabubnagat
Distlict (uorv Raugarciltll' Drstrict). IIis{irtltcrclied in the ycar 1994.-t'hcrcafier, petitioncr ltas srtcccccleclthe subject propelty I-lc lras subrnitted a rcptesetttatiotr dated2l .04.2025to rcsponclcnt No.2 u'itlr a rcquest tolnLltatc ltisnarne and issue patta(tar passbook-'[hc santo was not considered.Thelefore,he has lrlcd a Writ Petitiort No.25 198 ol2025. Zide olderdated 26.08.2025, this Court disposccl of thesaid t'ritpetitiongranting libelty to the petitioncr to submit onlineapplication to thc Cornpctcut Authorityalorrg u'itli rltthc rclevantdocutncnts,
2
\
including ihc ioint agrcenrcnI crccutcrl 111,. Llrc 1,- rticl:cr anr.l his brrrthr-:. ri itir l r-cqLre st 1o issuc -succe ssir,, ln(r nrutatior) Plrcccdtngs.Orr reccipt ol' llrc saici apPlitrrtr ,rr, this ( ouft ilircclcd tlr,,-( orrrl.rctcnt ,{Lrtlro|it1 ttl consrdcr un I .lisposc it ol'in lccortllutcc u rth lau
I In thc p|cscut rr rit alllrlai it. petitioucr- hrr: rot siatc(l irs lo sLrbrnissit'rn tr1 onlinc applrcatt()r) to the Cornptt,' rr r\Lrtltor ily tn cornpliaucc rvrth thc ordcr ilatul l(r.08 2025 irr I I) No.2-5 198 ol 1015. Ilc has suburitted a lcprescntation clarr', irl09.l()l) to r.csponrlcnt Nrrs.? to 4 u,ith a rc(llrest rx)t to clllcri irr atry kind of rcgistration arcl rrot to alktn' thenr to mutatc tll l nlrntes tlrose \ Ir() conrc rllcgulll . Accor.rlirrg to lhc 1rctili,, i )i i'es port< lctrt Nos.5 ancl(r arc laucl grabbcls.'l'he said rcl)rcs('r iltion \ ils n()t cousirlcrecl.-l hcrefirrc. cliallcngint thc sai,t inactiorr ol r-cspouilent Nos.2 to21, petitioncr' f ilccl the prcsclli ' rrl lrctiliorr l. r\s cliscusscd sr4rra. pctitiouer has curtailr'.1 lris lisht ovet thc sutrject lropcr1y. In conr;tliancc rvith thc r irresaid orcler rlalcd 26.08 2()2-5 in W.P.No.25l98 ol 202-5. hi rras 1o sutrmit orrlinc applicaiiou, alonq u,it[ 1ll the relcvarrt . rcunreuts and
.,/ l-*ry
3
joint agreemel)t. to the Contlretcnt Autltoritl' u,ith a rcqucst to issuc successitrr artcl ll]utatiollpt-occcciings.Uut, thc petitioncl' cun't subnrit a t-cptcsctttation clatctl0I 09 201-i ,'r'ith a requestnot to enterlain any kincl rcgistratitlrt oi'ctthe strb-iectpropcrty antl not to rnutate thc rtatncs o['thc others,ctc, curtailinghis riglit over thc sub-iectptl)pcfty. Pctitioltc'rcan't llle tllc plesellt wrlt petition atleging ttort -cousiclc t'itt to tt o[' llrcsaidrepresentation dated 01.09.2025.'l hcrefbrc, thcpctitioner.isnot cntitlcd for any relicf much lcss tlrc rclief soughtirt the prcse Iit rvrit pctttiou
Miscellancous applications, il anypcncling,shall stand
closcd. There shall be no orclcras to costs
S -B.REKHA RANI S TANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
i To,
PI\4K
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0611012025
ORDER
WP.No.30012 of 2025
/''"-
I
01 ric 20t5
\r. ,_
,.. ,
'i. * .//
------,-,'- a7
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS
b
?,<br>\ <br>
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to relief regarding the land without complying with the previous court order?
Whether the writ petition challenging the inaction of revenue authorities regarding representations is maintainable?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Shankaraiah @ Shankaraiah
State of Telangana
District Collector, Ranga Reddy District
Revenue Divisional Officer, Shadnagar Division
Tahsildar, Farooqnagar Mandal
Yyli9i Raju
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
