Munagapati Venkatesh v. The General Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
Telangana High Court writ petition (Art. 226); harassment of borrower and family by bank/NBFC collection/recovery agents; coercive loan-recovery practices; mandamus against harassment during EMI recovery; RBI guidelines/instructions Circular dated 12.08.2022 to be scrupulously followed by recovery agents; ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Prakash Kaur (2007) 2 SCC 711; ICICI Bank v. Shanti Devi Sharma (2008) 7 SCC 532; disposed in terms of earlier order in W.P. No. 5200 of 2024 dated 25.04.2024; no costs; unopposed by counsel for respondents 2 (Bajaj Financial Services) and 5 (ICICI Bank).
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with directions to the respondents and their agents to scrupulously follow the RBI guidelines in Circular dated 12.08.2022 and the Supreme Court judgments in ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Prakash Kaur and ICICI Bank v. Shanti Devi Sharma while recovering loan amounts from the petitioner; no costs; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stood closed.