The petitioner sought writ relief regarding rejection of community certificate for IAS Study Circle selection. Upon hearing, counsel stated interim directions already granted made further orders unnecessary, and the Court closed the petition without costs.
Writ petition closed; interim directions from earlier order stand; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 28565 OF 2025
Between:
Degama Karthik Kumar, S/o. Degama Ganga Sayanna ,Aged 24years, Occupation. Student, R/o.H.No. 6-1, Nallur Village, Mupkal Mandal, Nizamabad District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare action of the office of the Respondent No.3, more particularly Respondent No. 4, who deliberately rejected the Community and Date of Birth Certificate, 30.04.2024, in the finalprocess of selecting the candidates to the IAS Study Circle for ST's (respondent No.S), without any basis, expressed the
(
reason that thr: petitioner s NAyAKpoD community in the Nizamabad District not there, as suctr the petitioner does not come under ST community, for which, in spite of satisflring with GO No. .t44, dated 08.10.1997, since a month dragging the issue of enquiry or verification with the respondent No.6 and 7, for one or the other reasons, then constrained to approach the Respondent No. 2 and 3 with a representations' dated o4-og -2025 and arso the Respondent No. 1 with mair communicatio.' dated 11.og-2025., though no steps and actions are taken ti, so far, as such th'i) same is arbitrary, iregar and Unconstitutionar and consequentiary direct the Respondent No' 1 to 3 to consider the Representations, dated ' o4.O9.2025 anC 1'r.09.2025 by dury finarizing serection of the petitioner to attend the classes in lhe Study circle of Respondent No.5
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to pass interim directions on the Respondent No. 1 to 3 to consider the Representations, dated 04'09'20 25 and 11.09.2025 by dury finarizing serection of the petitioner to aftend the clasr;es in the Study circle of Respondent No.S
Counsel for the petitioner : SRI M. SARASWATHI REODY
Gounsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 : Gp FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 & Z : Gp FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
\
I : I I j t I I I I I i j
/
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
\
\
WRIT ONN ORDER:
5
Heard Sri M. Saraswathi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner; rearned Government pleader for Social welfare, for respondent Nos. r to 5 and learned. Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondent Nos.6 :nd 7.
"prtmq. facie, this Court ts of opinion that as per the cctltmunttg centfiiate- isued by respondent No.7, the p"{itioner \elongs to Naikpod-5 (ST) and" the icrutinizing of the said commurlity/ caste particurar-s of in"' petittoner wourd take considerabre time. h i"-p")trn nt to note that the UpSC coaching c/asses ale atreod.y commeruced and that ttrc petitioner u.titt "uj1., irrepars"b/e /oss due to no{ attendw the upsc coaching c/asses at respond.ent iVo.d iher"1or",-deems as an interim _.measure, this Coui it approprtate to direct tLe respond.ent /vo.S to gtue adrnissio" {?, the petitioner- lrcrein ti iitena *rc [/PSC coachtng c/cJses/onnu,in.i"'", nuul'-,*t't'''
3' .Today, learnecl counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of t.e interim order passed by this court i' I'A'No' L of 2025, dated Lg.og-2025, no further orders are required to^ be passecl in this Writ petition.
I I IIII IIt I t t B i
Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
,.:,,,
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/- M.JAWAHARREDDY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY/
OFFICER
To,
PVL TKS -w
t n
HIGH COURT
DATED i251101202s
THE S
-t:t-.2- 16 irg '102b 'ri
'
-.1.
ORDER
WP.No.28565 of 2025
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS
fis
el"l"o
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Degama Karthik Kumar
State of Telangana
The Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department
The Director, Tribal Cultural Research and Training Institute
The Field Investigator, Tribal Cultural Research and Training Institute
Indian Administrative Service Study Circle for Schedule Tribes
Nagesh Bhemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
