Disposed

Boddu Sai Kiran v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Feb 2025WP/2802/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Resident alleged a neighbour built five floors in deviation of a stilt plus two-floor building permission; the court directed the Deputy Commissioner to consider his complaint, inspect the site and take action per law within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Deputy Commissioner directed to consider representation dated 02.01.2025, inspect site, and act against respondent No.5 per Act 2019 with notice and hearing, within four weeks.

Boddu Sai Kiran Vs The State of Telangana — Municipal and Town Planning | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁸ ]

¶2

HIGH couRr FOR THE Sr{rF.oq TELANGANA Ar - " "HYDERABAD . (Special Original Jurisdiction)'

¶3

I,ONDAY, THE THIRD DAY oF FEaRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVi'

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶6

WRIT P ETITION NO:280 2 0F 202s

¶7

Between:

¶8

Boddu Sai Kiran, S/o. B. Umesh Aged_ 28 years H.*.6-s:i,;i;:'bil;hrNehruNas-ar,r.rewehoislg:t,iJ:rr:li3:#ffi i,fl "

¶9

AND

¶10

...PETIT|oNER

¶11

Tl" . State of Telanqana. Rep.by its princio:

¶12

fl i!:[i,:1d,il";[',"ou""ro"pitnt"bdJi'#i1,.t"1?E:1g,Al,',,?f igs]

¶13

' ffi 3,r:,1flj]Ifl?J3bad j\4unicipar corporation, rank Bund Road, Hvderabad,

¶14

The Zonal Commissioner., Greale.r Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Secunderabad Zone. Secu nderaoaa.-uyje,rl6all""

¶15

4' The Deputy commissioner' .Greater . Hyderabad Municipar corporation, Begumpet Circle _30. Begumpet. HyOerabai.^" -"""

¶16

5 fi llli]f{il'tffi,iliff^{:q.ilrli?&ffi} 'ffi :i,1ffi '?{:i,,yJ:_,J*i Nivas, o U cotony, RL rvasai. RamoJlly.'g;;"'""' oaj) nvoeraoaa.

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more parthularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the Respondent M. 2 to 4 herein in not stopping the iflegar and unauthorised construction being carried out by the Sth Respondent herein in contrary to the sanctioned pran and buirding permission vide Lr.No. 266946/cHMC r419912023dated- ogto3t2023, as iregar, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal corporation Act'1955 and arso Ts-bpass Act,2020 and consequenry direct the

¶19

Respondent l'lc .2 to 4 herein to revoke the building^{pernrrssi rn vide Lr.No.} 266946/GHt,4() I t1)912023, dated- 09/03i2023, and to d€'molish :he illegal and unauthorised cc ns.tructions already carried out by the 5th Re sporrdent hereinⁱⁿ premises i.e., H N,r 6-3-188, Jai Nagar Colony, New Bhoi-ttuda Se cunderabad.

¶20

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶21

Petition r nc t:r Section 1 51 CPC praying that in th() circurr stances stated in the affidavi': fllel in support of the petition, the High Cc,urt ma) be^pleased to direct the Respr:,n,ients No. 2 to 4 herein not to give, issianc;e at d^process any further clearances'permission including but not limited to ssLanc,) of occupancy certificate to th(r pr3mises i.e, H.No. 6-3-188, Jai Nagar,:;ol,lny. I'1ew Bhoiguda, Secunderabact ;rerrding disposal of the above Writ Petition

¶22

lA NO: 2 OF 2025

¶23

Petition t.nce,r Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the, c rcurrstances stated in the affidavi . f le i^,n support of the petition, the High C: u11 may be pleased to direct the Resipondent No.2 to 4 herein to consr:er ;:nC dispose the representatior s r:omplaints submitted by the petition€ r i,erei^.r vrde datedO21O112025 and 2)t(.)112025 by stopping the construction wc rk r premises i.e, H.No. 6-3-188, Jai Nagar Colony, New Bhoiguda. {jecrnderabad pending disposal of tho i1b(),() Writ Petition.

¶24

Counsel for the Pr:titioner: SRI B.ARJUN RAO

¶25

Counsel for the Rr:spondent No.1: AGP FOR MCPL ADMr.l URBAN DEV

¶26

Counsel for the Rr:spondent No.2 to 4: SRI G.MADHUSUETHAN Rl::DDY, SC FOR GHMC

¶27

The Court made, the following: ORDER

¶28

I I

¶29

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶30

WRIT PETITION No.2802 of2025

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for respondent No. 1 and Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4. perused the record.

¶33

In view of the nature of relief sought by the petitioner, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage dispensing with notice to respondent No.5.

¶34

Petitioner herein is resident ol Chacha Nehru Nagar, New bhoiguda, Hyderabad. Respondent No.S has obtained building permission for construction of stilt for parking + 2 upper floors, whereas, she has constructed hve floors without leaving setbacks. The said construction is in deviation to the building permit order. Therefore, the same is unauthorized construction. petitioner has submitted a representation, dated 02.O1.2025 ro respondent No.4 with a request to take action against rcspondent No.5. Despite

¶35

,/ /

¶36

K'J \/. '}.No.2802 of 2ul5

¶37

¶38

¶39

receiving rrnd acknowledging^{the saidrepres(ntation,} responctent No.4 did^{not act upon the samt:' lt'g51r ieved by} the sai 1 irLir,:tion^{of respondentNo'4, petilior,eriled the} present r,,rit ttetition.

¶40

Wh,:r':rs. Sri G. Madhusudhan^{IQedtil'. learned} StandirLg llr>unsel appearing^{forresponclentI o.4, on} instructir:,ns, would submit^{thatresponcient No.4 will} inspect tlrr: site, consider^{therepres€r.1t:ltior.dated} 02.Ol.i',O'.2i; submitted by^{thepetitiont:- ,rn<1 ilthe} allegatiorrs lade by the^{petitioner are founri to be correct,} he will^I ak er action against^{respondent \lo Iisl r-ictly in} accorrlitr ct: with the^{procedure laiddo',vrLur derthe} Telarrgirr a lr.{unicipalities^{Act, 2019 (for :;hcr t:l-rc Act'} 2019) b'. Jrrrtting the^{petitionerand resp':nrl--rr1No 5 on} notice irr rd irtTording^{them an opportunity o[ he.Lr-in..}

¶41

lrL h,: iight of the^said submissions,^{tLris \Vri} Pet ition IS dispor',e'l of directing respondent^{No.4 1o rol'} 'idcr^the repre s(rrl1zition, dated O2.O7.2025,^{inspecttht: si e and il} the allc:rra i(,ns made by the petitioner^{at'e IoL.tr rcl to be:}

¶42

KL,J W.P.No.2802 of 2025

¶43

¶44

t I i i I :

¶45

correct, he shall take action against respondent No.S strictly in accordance with the procedure laid down under the Act, 2079 by putting the petitioner and respondent No.5 on notice and affording them an opportunity of hearing. He shall complete the said exercise within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of reieipt of copy of this order. No costs.

¶46

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶47

To,

¶48

SD/. K. AMMAJI IS ANT REGISTRAR SECTION^OFFICER

¶49

//TRUE^COPY//

¶50