Dismissed¶30

Smt.B.Pushpalatha v. The District Collector, R.R.District, Lakdikapool

Telangana HC3 Feb 2025WP/1865/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, W.P. No. 1865 of 2010, decided 03.02.2025 by Justice K. Lakshman; writ of mandamus under Article 226 regarding delivery of possession of flats and receipt of balance amount under the Indiramma Urban Housing Scheme; dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission that cause no longer survives; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; Section 151 CPC application; no merits adjudication, no cases cited, no quantum.

What did the court decide?

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives and has become infructuous, the Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and directed that there shall be no order as to costs. ¶29-30

Smt.B.Pushpalatha Vs The District Collector… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁸ I

¶2

IN TI.IE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 1865 OF 2010

¶8

Between:

¶9

'1 . Smt. B. Pushpalatha, Wo. Ashok Reddy Labour Fl/o.H.No.2-7-4, Bharathnagar, Uppal, Hyderabad

¶10

Smt. D. Pooja, W/o. D. Shanker Labour Rl/o.H.No.2-7-4, Bharathnagar, Uppal, Hyderabad

¶11

Smt. T. Taramma, Wo. T. Srinivas Labour Rl/o.H.No.2-7-4, Bharathnagar, Uppal, Hyderabad

¶12

Smt. M. Geetha, W/o. M. Thirthaiah Labour Rl/o.H.No.2-7-4, Bharathnagar, Uppal, Hyderabad

¶13

...PETITIONERS

¶14

AND

¶15

1 The District Collector, R.R.District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad 2 The Deputy Commissioner, GHMC, Uppal circle, Uppal, Hyderabad 3 The Deputy Commissioner, Kapra lvlunicipality, Malkajgiri,Hyderabad 4 The Deputy Commissioner, L.B.Nagar Municipality, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad

¶16

.,.RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that^{in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court^may be pleased to issue a writ order or directions more particularly writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representations^of the petitioners to deliver the^possession of respective flats to the^{petitionersand} receive the balance amount from the^petitioners under the lndiramma Urban Housing Scheme arbitrary, illegal, and void against to the letter and spirit to the constitution of lndia., and consequently direct the respondents to deliver^the possession of respective flats to the petitioners by receiving the balance amount.

¶18

-r==7

¶19

l.A. NO:^'t OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 2502OF 2010)

¶20

Petition under Siection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct'the iespondents to deliver the possession of respective flats to the petitioners by receiving the balance amount pending disposal of main writ petition.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt MOHD MUMTAZ PASHA

¶22

Counsel ior the Respondent No.'l: GP FOR REVENUE

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI RAMACHANDRA REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN}

¶26

WRIT PETITION No.1865 oF^2O1O

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

Sri Mohd. Mumtaz Pasha,^{learned counselforthe} petitioners, on instructions, would^{submit that cause in the} present writ petition no longer survives^{and ithas become} infructuous.

¶29