B. Rama Sarma Vs Additional Industrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Court

Additional lndustrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Costurt, Rep. by its Chairman-Cum-Presiding Officer, Chandravihar Building, i Floor, M.J. Road, Hyderabad - 1.

¶14

The Chairman, IDL lndustries Limited, 4th Floor, Chenoy Trace Centre, park Lane, Secunderabad^. 3

¶15

The . Managing Director, IDL Industries Limited, Setfler, IDL Rural Development Trust, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-18.

¶16

Mr Vasudeva .Mrfhy, Se^cretary/Ex-Trustee, IDL lndustries Limited, Setfler, Kukatpally, Hyderabad -^'l B.

¶17

Since the conditional order of the Court dated 11.12.2012 has not been complied- with, the d.efault clause of the said order has been given etrect io and the W.P. accordingly stands dismissed as against RespondEnlNo .4.-^-

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1"t respondent in lD No. 72 of 2oo1 and issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari, and quash the Award passed by the l"trespondent in lD No. 72 of 2001, dated 31-3-2008, published on 10-7-2008, hotding the same as illegat, unjust, contrary to law and peryerse.

¶20

WRIT PETITIO NNO:21166 OF 2008

¶21

Between:

¶22

Ra.m_Singh, S/o. Munia, aged Srbo.ut p1 yeqr.s, Occ: Ex_Employee in DL Industries Ltd., R/o. 19-51 Sevalat Nagar, Kaithalap,jr, HVbe-r"OaO.

¶23

AND

¶24

...PET|T|ONER

¶25

Additional Chbirman-CIum-Presiding Officer, Chandravihar ndustrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Court, Buitd ing, i.itioo i,'-HI..l. Rep. by ]ioaO,its Hyderabad

¶26

The chairman, rDL rndusfties Limited, 4th Floor, chenoy Trade centre, park Lane, Secunderabad.

¶27

'^{I:?,#flF#i+?,,,?',1","*t:[",f?t} rj:?j;Xl:s Limited, Set er, rDL Rurar

¶28

Mr. Vasudeva Murthv. secretaryi Ex-Trustee, rDL Industries Linrited, seftrer, Kukatpally, Hyderabaci.

¶29

Dismissed for defaurt as against Respondent No.4 as per court order dated 24.06.2011.

¶30

...RESPONDENTS

¶31

Petition under Articre 226 of rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High co urt may be pleased to call for the records from the l"trespondent in lD no. g0 rrf 2001 and issue an appropriate writ order or direction particurarry one in the nature of writ of certiorari and quash the Award passed by the 1"t Respondent in rD No g0 of 2001 dated 31-3-2008 pubtished on 19-6-2008 holding the same as illegal unjust contrary to law and perverse.

¶32

WRIT PETI TION NO:2 1635 0F 2008

¶33

Between:

¶34

B Sattaiah, S/o.Janoaiah. ag.ed about 54 years, occ: Ex.Emproyee in rDr_ rndustries Ltd., R/o.8-30, KaithZtapu., FtvOeraUiA_r g'

¶35

AND

¶36

...PETITIONER

¶37

't. Additional lndustrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labou c h "^{ffi;;ffi -"iilj i, o i,i g' "dm;" i c i,;J;;h;,. ilii;;!, ?s ii;"} i^if ,^rJ",ll

¶38

2 The Chairman, IDL lndustries Limited, 4th floor, Chenoy Trace Ct-,ntre, park Lane, SecunderabaC-3

¶39

3 Ili",#fl:xnJ+?*,?',1","J:l;",,!,?tnrjl?,,fg:i,^{Limited, senrer, rDL Rurar}

¶40

4

¶41

I,I*Yffi "f,,r[i$';rf51'et"vre'^{rrustee,I DL Industries Limited, seft rer,}

¶42

defautr as asainst Respondent No.4 as per Court Order dated ii:6H;01".

¶43

...RESPONDENTS

¶44

Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the .l st respondent in lD.No.82 of 2001 and tssue an appropriate writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and quash the Awa rd passed by the 1st responde nt in lD.No.B2 ot 2001 dated 31.3.2008 published on 19.6.2008 holding the same as illegal, unjust contrary to law and perverse.

¶45

WR]T PETITION NO: 21636 oF 2008

¶46

Between:

¶47

K. Teja, Sio. K. Mania. aged ap.out 52 years, Occ: Ex-Employee in IDL lndustries Ltd., Rlio. 19-47, Seva'tat Nagar, Kaithalapur, Hyderabad_1 8.'

¶48

AND

¶49

...PETITIONER

¶50

Additional lndustrial Tribunal_cum_Additional Lat fi Xj# # #-h'!Sro i..i g oniE" i c i,liiiii,i r,?,. a'if8l! ?s Tf;" Iifl , tJ", ll

¶51

, I*":3A[X]aJ],jB:J11,.,,'". Limited, 4h Froor, chenoy rrace centre, park t #i"'#ffi'+?,",?i1","#[",f?'"rJ:?:fyl:s8. Limited, seft rer, rDL Rurar

¶52

t [,]r"t33ffidY,:t:vd-,s':"tarylEx-rrustee,^{IDL Industries Limited, setser,} defautr as against Respondent No.4 as per Court Order dated

¶53

,TBAl%flar ...RESPONDENTS

¶54

Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to cafi for the records from the 1"r respondent in r.D.No.7B of 2001 and issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particurarry one in the nature of writ of Certiorari, and quash the Awa rd passed by the .l "t respondent in I.D.No.7g of 200't' dated 31-03.2008, pubrished on 16.06.2008, hording the same as iregar, unjust, contrary to law and perverse.

¶55

ea

¶56

WRIT PETITION NO: 21637 OF 2008

¶57

Between:

¶58

K.Shankar S/o. K. Mohan. aged about 52 years, Occ: Ex-Employee in I[)L lndustries Ltd., Rl/o.^'19-64, Sevalal Nagar, Kaithalapur, Hyderabad-18.

¶59

...PETITIONER

¶60

AND

¶61

'1 . Additional lndustrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Court, Rep. by its Chairman-cum-Presiding Officer, Chandravihar Building, 1"'Floor M.J. Road, Hyderabad - 1

¶62

The Chairman, IDL lndustries Limited, 4th Floor, Chenoy Trace^(.)entre, Park Lane, Secunderabad-3.

¶63

The [Vlanaging Director, IDL lndustries Limited, Settler, IDL Rural Development Trust Kukatpally, Hyderabad-18.

¶64

Mr. Vasudeva Murthy, Secretary / Ex-Trustee, IDL lndustries Lim ted, Settler, Kukatpally, Hyderabid-1 B.

¶65

Dismissed for default as against Respondent No.4 as per Court,lrder dated 24.06.2011.

¶66

...RESPONDENTS

¶67

Petition under Arf icle 226 of the Constiti.rtion of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Corrrt may be pleased to call for the records from the^'l'r respondent in l.D.No, 66 of 201 and issue an appropriate wril, order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari, and quash the Award passed by the 1st respondent in l.l.).No. 66 of 2001, dated 31-3-2008, published on 19-6-2008, holding the same as illegal, uniust, contrary to law and perverse.

¶68

WRIT PETITION NO:22702 OF 2008

¶69

Between:

¶70

A. Prakash S/o. Sriramulu, aged about 46 years, Occ: Ex-Employee in IDL lndustries Ltd., R/o. 8-21 h, Kaithalapur, Hyderabad.

¶71

AND

¶72

...PETTTTONER

¶73

Additional Industrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Court. Reo. bv its Chairman-cum-Presiding Officer, Chandravihar Building, 1.t Floor, fr/.l. (oaO, Hyderabad - 1

¶74

The Chairman, IDL lndustries Limited,4th Floor, Chenoy Trace C;entre, park Lane, Secunderabad.

¶75

The Managing Director, !DL lndustries Limited, Setfler, IDL Rural Development Trust, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

¶76

4 [,jiJ,5:iir1",]ir!lltlll secretary/Ex-rrusree rDL rndustnes Limited, setner, |;..ffi:rs5fl"r" defautt as against Respondent No.4 as per Court Order ctated

¶77

...RESPONDENTS

¶78

petition under Articre 226 0f rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be ,o^'-u'"* to ca' for the records from the 1st Respondent in rD No. 7g of 2001 and rssue an appropriate writ order or direction particurarry one in the nature of writ of certiorari and quash the Award passed by the 1st Respondent In rD No. 7g of 2001 dated 31-3-2008 pubrished on 16-6-2008 hording the same as iregar, unjust contrary to law and perverse.

¶79

WRIT PETITI ON NO: 28008 oF 2008

¶80

Betweenl

¶81

b o ut + s vea rs, occ : Ho us e h o rd, Ri/o. ?r3 tf UIsfl tri"Y,'Rli36,ir)li* ag:l :

¶82

AND ...PETITIONER

¶83

Additional lndustriat S;3hS-r*E[1i,,lU%]fl^{;?l8;lfl l,,i?li,il.bi?S,X!,?e,JL"["ni,H",,1]}

¶84

The Chairman, IDL h Lane, Secunderro"o ldJ"tti".^{Limited,4th Floor, ChenoyTrace} centre,^park

¶85

t Limited, set er, rDL Rurar

¶86

#%,#ii"X1i+Y,"rDi[u,'kt:i'i,,,i?t rJB?JfyJ:su

¶87

Mr. Vasudeva Murthv Kukatpally, Hyaerab# secretary/Ex-Trustee, IDL lndustries Limited, setler,

¶88

...RESPONDENTS

¶89

petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to ca, for-the records from the 1'r respondent in ID No. 68 of 2001 and issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particurarry one in the nature of writ of certiorari, and quash the Award passed by the 1.t respondent in ID No. 6g of 2001' dated 31-3-2008, pubrished on't9-6-2008, hording the same as iregar, unjust, contrary to law and peryerse.

¶90

WRIT PETITION NO: 281 50 0F 2008

¶91

Between:

¶92

M.Lingamaiah, _S/o.^Lq!s!qrgiqh, aged about 46 years, Occ: Ex-employee in IDL lndustries Ltd., R/o.8-231 1 , Kaithalapur, Hyderabad-18.

¶93

AND

¶94

. PETITTONER

¶95

Additional lndustrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Court, Rep. bv its Chairman-Cum-Presiding Officer, Chandravihar Building, 1.t Floor, U.L. fioaO, Hyderabad - 1

¶96

The Chairman, IDL ln-dustries Limited,4h Floor, Chenoy Trade Centre, park Lane, Secunderabad-3.

¶97

The . Managing Director, IDL lndustries Limited, Setfler, IDL Rural Development Trust, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-18.

¶98

Mr Vasudeva Murthy, Secretary/Ex-Trustee, IDL lndustries Linrited, Settler, Kukatpally, Hyde.abad-1 8.

¶99

...RESPONDENTS

¶100

Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia prayin{l that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High cou( may be pleased to call for the records from the 'l st respondent in l.D.No.73 of 2001 and issue an appropriate Writ, Qdsp or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of certiorari, and quash the Award passed by the 1st Respondent in l.D.No.73 of 2001, dated 31.3.2008, published on 16.6.2008, holding the same as iltegal, unjust, contrary to law and perverse.

¶101

WRIT PETITION NOt 28174 OF 2008

¶102

Between:

¶103

l.fo['^r,_9tq^{Kaloo, ageda--b9.r1tS-0 yea.rs,Occ: Ex-employeein IDL} lnrlustries Ltd., Fi/o.^'19-49, Sevalal Nagar, Kaithalapirr, Hyderabad-1g

¶104

AND

¶105

...PETITIONER

¶106

1 Additional lndustrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Cou st^{rt, llep. by its}

¶107

Chairman-cum-Presiding Officer, Chandravihar Building, 1 Floor, M.J.Road, Hyderabad-1

¶108

The Chairman, lDL. lndustries Limited, 4th Floor, Chenoy Trace ri)entre, park Lane, Secunderabad-3

¶109

The Managing Director, IDL lndustries Limited, Settler, IDL Rural

¶110

Development Trust. Kukatpally, Hyderabad_18

¶111

4 Mr Vasudeva lMurthy, secretary/Ex-Trustee, IDL rndustries Limited, settrer, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-1 B

¶112

24.06.2011.Dismissed for default as aqainst Respondent No.4 as per Court Order dated

¶113

...RESPONDENTS

¶114

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1't respondent in rD.No.75 of 2001 and issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, particurarry one in the nature of writ of Certiorrari, and quash the Award passed by the f.trespondent in l.D.No.7s of 2001, dated 31'03.2008, pubrished on 16-6-2008, hording the same as iilegar, unjust, contrary to law and perverse.

¶115

WRIT PETITlO N NO:28388 oF 2008

¶116

Between:

¶117

f; iSf il??:?,.,:Stfl lA:"3::fl fl,;.::nT#H:j1,i,1",x,,i:{",ff :,"pJ#dEEmp'ovee

¶118

AND

¶119

...PETITIoNER

¶120

1' Additionar rndustriar. ..Triburrar-cum-Additionar Labour, court Rep.bv its chairman cum^presidins oricer cnanoraiii,i, euirdi"d r iiFio"i'iliJhoro Hyderabad-1

¶121

The ctrairman, rDL rndustries Limited, 4rh Froor chenoy Trace centre park Lane Secunderabad-3

¶122

t

¶123

#,"r,Y,?,1fl3,,i3,,r?'ij;i""?rl?h^{rndustries Ltd ' seftrer rDL Rurar Deveropment}

¶124

Mr vasudeva Murthy, ^^{secretary Ex-TrusteerDL lndustries Ltd seftrer}

¶125

Kukatpalty Hyderabadll B

¶126

pisgls^s^e! for defaurt as against Respondent No.4 as per court order dated 24.06.2011.

¶127

...RESPONDENTS

¶128

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st respondent in rD No.71 of 2001 and issue an appropriate writ order or direction particurarry one in the nature of writ of certiorari and quash the Award passed by the 1st respondent in rD No.71 of 2001 dated 31-3-2008 pubrished on 19-6-2008 hording the same as iilegar unjust contrary to law and perverse.

¶129

WRIT PETITION NO: 28508 OF 2008

¶130

Between:

¶131

1 K. Venkat Rao S/o. Jangaiah (died per LRs.)

¶132

2 $q]^{(-Swaqalatha,W/o. K.-Venkat.Rao, aged 40 years, Oc:c:} Housewife, H. No.3-3 1 4, Venkatrao Nagar Colony, Kukatpa-lly, Hydi-,rabad.

¶133

3 K. Amarender Rao, S/o. Late K. Venkat Rao, aged about 17 ve,ars. (clinicallv handicapped) H No.3-3'1 4, Venkatrao Nagar Col-ony, Kukatpally Hya;;;bil.' (Petitioners 2 and 3 are brought on record as LRs of deceased r;ole petitioner as per Court Order dated 19.03.2012 in W.p.M.p.No .24199 of 2011)

¶134

AND

¶135

...PETITIONERS

¶136

't. Additional lndustrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour, Court. Reo. bv its Chairman-Cum-Presiding Officer, Chandravihar Building, f "r Fforr, tri.j.^-ioaO, Hyderabad

¶137

2 The C_hairman, IDL lndustries Limited, 4th Floor Chenoy Trace, Centre park Lane Secundera bad-3.

¶138

3 Jfe ltgnTSin9,Director,^{IDL Industries Limited, Setfler IDL Rural Development} I rust, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

¶139

4 Mr_Vasudeva lvlurthy, Secretary/Ex-Trustee IDL lndustries L mited Seftler Kukatpally, Hyderabad-'l 8. ...RESPONDENTS

¶140

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of lndia prayin,J that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High c,rurt may be pleased to call for the records from the 1't respondent in lD No.B9 of 2001 and issue an appropriate writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari and quash the Award passed by the 1"t respondent in lD No.g9 of 2001 dt 31-3-2008 published on 19-6-2008 holding the same as illegal unjust contrary to law and perverse.

¶141

WRIT PETITION NO:28834 0F 2008

¶142

Between:

¶143

M.Fakeera, s/o.Devja, aged ab-out 48 years, occ: Ex-employee in lt.)L lndustries Ltd., Fl/o.19-54, Sevatal Nigar, Kaithalapr,: ftVA"iJOaO'-f A.

¶144

AND

¶145

...PETITIONER

¶146

'1. Additional Industriar rrib^q!ar-cum-Additionar Labour, court, rep. bv its chairman-cum-presidino officer, chandravirrir euirding, riiFi""",ii.l. iL"a Hyderabad-1 .

¶147

The Chairman. IDL Lane, Secunderabad-3.lnrtustries Limitei,, 4th Floor, Chenoy Trade Centre, park

¶148

t #i",#flsn'+n .,,o',1","nt:["'f?i.,ril?J;:t:su Limited, Se*rer, r DL Rurar

¶149

Mr.Vasudeva Mu(hv. S

¶150

Kukatpally, HVOeraOaO-f SfretaryiEx-Trustee,^{IDL lndustries Limited, Set,er,} defautt as against Respondent No.4 as per Court Order dated

¶151

3i:6frs,1ar.

¶152

...RESPONDENTS

¶153

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to ca, for the records from the 'tst respondent in r.D.No.g' 0f 2001 and issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particurarry one in the nature of writ of certiorari' and quash the Award passed by the 1"t respondent in r-D.No.g5 0f 200r, dated 31.3.2008, pubrished on 10.7.2008, hording the same as iregar, unjust, contrary to law and perverie.

¶154

WRIT PET]TION NO: 28835 O F 2008

¶155

Between:

¶156

B. Mallesham, S/o.Mahadevappa, aged about 54 years, Occ: Ex Employee - in IDL r nd u stries Lrd. 3-3.t 4, venr<atrid t ias;; 6;;;, f Jrrripl lrv, Hy derabad _7 2

¶157

AND

¶158

...PETITIONER

¶159

Additional lndustrial Trihunal-cum-Additional Labour, Court, reo. bv its c h a i rma n -cu m -^p re s id i n o ofrfe r, C h ; ft;;i #,. e;: il"i ;; 1 ;iF i;b r: ;riJ. Kt, d

¶160

2 |}fr":!!ffiil lDlolndustries Limited, 4h Floor chenoy Trace centre, park

¶161

3 Ill"yftl?g'#,'B:,.fi"rl8:,lB:Jl,tstries^{Limited'Settrer rDL Rurar Deveropment}

¶162

4 Mr Vasudeva Murthv. Secretary/Ex-Trustee rDL rndustries Limited, setfler, Kukatpally, Hyderaba-d-1 8

¶163

...RESPONDENTS

¶164

Petition under Articre 226 0t the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the' High court may be pleased to calr for the records from the 'r'r respondent in rD No.g7 of 2oo1 and issue an appropriate writ order or direction particurarry one in the nature of writ of certiorari and quash the Award passed by the 1't respondent in rD No.g7 of 2001

¶165

dated^{31 -3-2008publishedon 19-6-2008holding the sameas illegalunjust} contrary^{to law and se1/ice'}

¶166

WRIT PETITION NO: 28836^{OF 2008}

¶167

Between:

¶168

Smt. A. Durgamma^{W,tr. LateA. Sriramulu,aged about 45 years, oc:c:Household,} dl o. 6-2-17^{8-, Kukatpal y, Hyderabad-7 2}

¶169

AND

¶170

Additional^{lndr,strialTribunal-cum-AdditionalLabour court rep. by its} ' Ctiir,""rn.rm-Dresiding officer, Chandravihar Building, '1" Fl'>or' M J Road HYderabad-1

¶171

The^{Chairman, IDL lndustries Limited, 4h Floor, ChenoyTracr>Centre, Park} Lane, Secunderabad-3

¶172

The^{ManagingDirector, IDL lndustriesLtd settlerIDL RuraiDevelopment} Trust KukaPatllY^HYderabad-18

¶173

Mr.^{Vasudevalvlurthy,Secretary/Ex-Trustee IDL lndustries Limited, settler,} KukatPallY,^HYderabad-1B

¶174

Dismissed^{for default as against Respondent No.2,3 & 4 as p'-'1 Court Order} dated 24 06 2o'1

¶175

...RE:'P.NDENTS

¶176

petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia^prayirg that^{in the} circumstances^{statedin the affidavit filedtherewith,the High t.)ourt may be} pleased to call^{for the recordsfrom the 1't respondentin lD No.Bl) of 2001 and} issue^{an appropriatewrit order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of} Certiorari^{and quashthe Award passedby the1"t respondent in lD No.83of 2001} dated^{31-3-2008 publishedon 19-6-2008 holdingthe sameas illegal unjust} contrary^{to law and service.}

¶177

WRI T PETITION NO: 17605 OF²⁰⁰⁹

¶178

Between:

¶179

A.Satvanarayana^{S/o Ramaiah,aged about 46.} -years, .Oc.c.:^{Ex-errrployeein IDL} i"o-r.irit.^{Ltd., R/o.6-2196.Vivekananda Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-72}

¶180

..PETITIONER

¶181

AND

¶182

Additional^{lndustrialTribunal-cum-AdditionalLabour Co} urt, rep. by its "Ciiii*rn-"Jm-Cresiding officer, Chandravihar Building, 1"t Floor, M.J. Road, Hyderabad-1

¶183

2- The chairman, rDL rndustries Limited, 4h Froor, chenoy Trade centre, par* Lane, Secunderabd-3

¶184

The . Managing Director, .rDL. rndustries Limited, settrer, rDL Rurar Development Tiust, Kukatpally, Hyderabd-iA

¶185

Mr. Vasudeva Murthv secretary/Ex-Trustee, rDL rndustries Limited, setfler, Kukatpally, Hyderabad'.

¶186

since. the conditionar order of the court dared 12.12.2012 has not been and complied with, the w.p. accordingrv the default clause stands dismissed of the said ii igiinst oiOer nal neip""oEiirri".+1"' Uee; gil;, ;ffJ;i;^*

¶187

...RESPONDENTS

¶188

Petition under Articre 226 ot the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1"t respondent in l.D.No.gg of 2001 and issue of writ of certiorari, and quash the Award passed by the 1"t respondent in l.D.No.B8 of 2001 dated 3't-3-2008 pubrished on 19-6-2008, holding the same as illegal, unjust, contrary to law and perverse.

¶189

WRIT PETITION NO:17 677 0F 2009

¶190

Between:

¶191

Y. Li mited, Pochaiah R/o. s/o. 8-69, Yellaiah, aged about 45 years, Seva lai Ni ga r, Xaitfraia'pui, -ff vo6ia occ:^bad_ Ex-employee in IDL lndustries^I A.

¶192

AND

¶193

...PETITIONER

¶194

Additional lndustrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Court, reo. bv its

¶195

Chairman-cum-Presid i ng Officer, Chandravihar Building, 1"t Floor, fr4.l. {oaii

¶196

Hyderabad-1.

¶197

The chairman,. rDS rndustries Limited, 4th Froor, chenoy Trace centre, park Lane, Secundeiabad.

¶198

3 Ilu , Manag.ing Director, IDS tndustries Limited, Seftler, IDL Rural uevetopment Trust, Kukatpally, Hyderabad_19.

¶199

Mr. vasudeva Murthv- secretary/Ex-Trustee, rDL Industries Limited, setfler, Kukatpally, Hyderabaci-1 8.

¶200

since the conditional order of the court dated 04.11 .2013 has not been complied with, and the W.P. accordingly stands dismissed the default clause of the said order has oeen as againsi deip""oEiili"z. qiren effect^"' io^*

¶201

...RESPONDENTS

¶202

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1"t respondent in l.D.No. 89 of 2001 and

¶203

issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, and quash the Award passed by the 1't respondent in I.D.No. 89 of 2001, dated 31-3-2008, published on 19-6-2008, hotding the san-re as illegat, unjust, contrary to law and perverse.

¶204

Counsel for the Petitioner in all the Writ Petitions:

¶205

SRI A. K. JAYAPRAKASH RAO

¶206

Counsel for the Respondent No.l in all the Writ Petitions: cp FOR {_ABOUR

¶207

Counsel for the Respondents in all the Writ Petitions:

¶208

SRI D, RAVISHANKAR RAO

¶209

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

¶210

dv

¶211

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAXA

¶212

WRIT PETITIONS I{o. 28OO2 2Lt66 21635 2 1636. 2l 7-22702 2EOO8 28150 24t74 28388 28508 2AA34 28835 28836 0F 2008 17605 AND t7677 0F 2009

¶213

COMMON ORDER:

¶214

The issue involved in all these Writ Petitions being the same, they are heard together. However, for convenience sake, facts in Writ Petition No. 28OO2^{of 2O08 are taken} up^for consideration.

¶215

Petitioner claims to have^joined respondent IDL Industries Limited on 01.O7. 1972. lt is^{stated,Respondents2} and 3 created a Trust in 1981 in the^premises of^respondent company and the 4fr respondent^{was shown} as^{Trustee- In} 1981, petitioner was transferred to work under the control of the 4d' respondent Trust. It is further stated that IDL Industries Limited was one of the leading manufacturers of explosives and later, it started other businesses, like bull mother farm, liquid nitrogen plant, cattle rearing, etcetera. According to petitioner, Trust is part and parcel of IDL Industries Limited and Trustees of the said Trust are also officers of the said organization.

¶216

While so, the 4fr respondent issued notice of termination dated 3 1 .O¹ .20O 1 stating that Trust ceased to exist after 31.O1.2001. It is alleged that Respondents 2 and 3 without

b-

--:€da-=.---4

2

absorbing^{petitioner' illegallyterminatedthrough the4th} respondent^{Tht: main grievanceof petitioner is that th e 4th} respondent^{lvas lrot his appointingauthority and the Trusl was} created^{subsequent to hisappointmentinIDLIndu stries} Limited;^{u'henthe existence of the 4'l' responden[ ceast'd'he} should have^{be:n aken back to IDL lndustriesLimited ' Itis} comPlained^{thatseveral other employeeswho u'orkedin the} Trust^{were absorbedin the company but the same bene:-rt was} not extended^{to petitionerand other 28 co-employees'}

¶221

It is^{stated' subsequently'the 3'lresF'ondent} Limited introduced^{a rlew organ izatiort - IDL Agro Chemicals} n Cents² under^{the cour-rolof IDL IndustriesLimitedand Respo} and^{3took permanentas well as contract workers lgnonng} petitioner^{and other co-employees' Thoughthe worker;' union} issued^{chartr:t' of demandsto the 4s respondent on 03'o7 1998'} same^{ti11 31 ) 1'2001;} did not^considerthe managemenl lndustrial^Tribunal-I' Union^{approachedthe} therefore,^the HYderabad^bY raising^{I.D'No70 of 1996 whereinthe Tribunal} by Award^{dated 2O'o21998 held that petitronerstht rreinand} others^{are llot emPloYeesof IDL Industries Limitecr but are} employee^{or the 4m respondent Trust' which hnding'according}

¶222

to petitioner is based on the compromise decree in O.S.No. 117 of 1983, dated 29.1 1.1984 on the file of the District Munsif, West and South, Hyderabad to the effect that plaintiffs in the said suit are not employees of IDL Industries Limited and they have no dispute against IDL Industries Limited and they are employees of IDL Rural Development Trust. It is stated, petitioner is not partlz to the said suit nor had he signed any compromise, as alleged by respondents. Thereafter, petitioner lried I.D.No. 72 ol 2OOl under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 7947. Therein, Respondents 2 and. 3 had taken out I.A.No. 106 of 2003 to decide. jurisdiction and maintainability of the case as preliminary issue. The said Application was dismissed on merits by order dated 31.01.2005. Aggrieved thereby, Writ Petition No. 1163 of 2OO6 was {iled, wherein this Court passed order dated LZ .O8.2OOZ directing the. Tribunal to decide the issue of res judicata as preliminary issue. In view of thc said direction, the Tribunal Iimited to the point whether the Award passed in I.D.No. 7O of 1996 operates as res judicata in I.D.No. 72 of 2OOl. The Tribunal held that I.D.No. 72 of 20O1 is barred by principles of res judicata. Hence, this Writ Petition.

¶223

4

¶224

H,:,lrd Sri A.K. Jayaprakash^{Rao, lcarnedcounsel} for petitioner iLs well as learned^{GovernmentPleader frrr Labour'} 4. Having perused the material^{on record and having} heard learned^{,:ounselon either side, the only pointthar- draws} attention of thrs Court is^{whether Awardin I-D.No. 70 'tf 1996} operates as res^judicata in^{this case or not- Admitte< Ity, the} employees of tDL Rural^{DevelopmentTrust filed O.S No 112 of} 1983 on the fiLe of the District^{MunsifCourt (Westand South)} and the saicl suit ended in^{compromise to the effccttL at they} are not emplc,yees of IDL^{Industries Limited;thev have no} dispute against IDL Industries^{Limited and that tlLey are} employees of IDL Rural^{DevelopmentTrust onlyH owever,} petitioner herein is not parq/ to the said suit.^{Subseque ntly, as} Respondents i2 and 3 took^{permanentas well as( rontract} workers in the' Organisation -^{IDL Agro ChemicalsLin ited by} ignoring petitioner and other workers,^{the workers' Union} issued charter of demands to the Secretary I^{trx Trus.ee, IDL} Industries Lrrnited on^{O3.07.1998butmanagcm,:nt till} 31.01.2001 clid not consider the^{same, hence, the uorkmen} union approzr<:hed Industrial Tribunal I,^{Hyderabadandhled} I.D.\fo- 70 of :.996. The said Dispute was allowed hold^{ng that} \

¶225

5

¶226

petitioner and others are employees^{of the Trust and petitioner} nnion is barred by principle ol^{res judicafa, based on the} judgment and decree daLed 29.11.1984 in O.S.No'^{112 of 1983'} The said Award was^{passedwithoutadjudicatingthe issue of} reference of termination order.^{According to respondents,the} workman covered under the^{present referencewas also party to} the said suit, hence he is^{estopped from raising the present} dispute. However, as could^{beseen from thecopy of} compromise decree in the suit,^{hled along with a memo on} behalf of petitioner, the^{presentpetitionerwas not arrayed as} party thereto. Further, I.D.No.^{70 of1996 was hled by'the} Workers' union, whereas^{the present [.D. was filed by petitioner} in his individual capacity ,^{hence, the said decree is not binding} on petitioner. Therefore, it^{cannot be said that the present I'D'} is barred by principle of^{res judicoto.The Awardimpugned} therefore, deserve to^{be set aside, in the consideredopinionof} this Court.

¶227

Writ Petition No-^{28OO2 of 2OO8 is accordingly,} allowed, setting aside^{the Award dated 31 O3'2OO8in I D'No72} of 2O01 on the^{ltle of the l't respondent.}

¶228

6

¶229

I1 the light of the same, Writ Petitions No. 21 166, 2t635, 21636, 21637, 22702, 28008, 28150, 2a171, 28388, 28508, 28834, 28835, 28836 of 2008, 17605 and 17677 of 2OO9 are alsc ,lllowed. No costs.

¶230

7 . C onsequently, the miscellaneous Applica' ions, if

¶231

any shall stan,l closed.

¶232

sD/-s.^MALLIKARJUNA ASSISTANT^RE GI RAR //TRUE^COPY// SECTTON FICER

¶233