Writ petition seeking consideration for promotion as Deputy Director of Town and Country Planning ignoring a 2016 charge memo was dismissed as infructuous at the petitioner's request, no representation being made.
None; writ petition dismissed as infructuous, no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
/
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITI ON NO:25 098 0F 2017
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st and 2nd Respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion as Deputy Director of rown and country pranning without taking into consideration of charge memo issued by the 1st Respondent in G O Rt No.640, Municipar Administration and Urban Deveropment (vig.r) Department, Dated 06/10/2016 (incident pertains to the year of 200g) and promote him as such with a, consequentiar benefits by issuing a writ more in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction from this Hon,ble court
l.A. NO: 10F 2017(WPMP. NO: 31126 0F 2017)
Petition under section 'r5'1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the 1st and 2nd Respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion as Deputy Director of rown and country pranning without taking into consideration
)
of charge memo issued by the 1st Respondent in G.o.Rt.No.640, Ir/unicipal Administration & Urban Development (Vig.ll) Department, Dated o6t1012016 (incident pertains to the year of 2008) and promote him as such pending disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RANGARAJULA RAJASEKHARA RAO (NOT PRESENT)
CounSel forthe Respondents: Gp FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLESRI JUSTICENAGESHBHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITIONNo.25O980F2017
oRDER:
When thematter was taken up for consideration
on 13.02.2025,therewas no representationon behalf of the petitionerand the matter was directed to be listedon 20.02.2025underthe caption"For Dismissal"' On 20'02'2025 the petitionerrequestecl to post the matter under the caption
"For Infructuous"'
" Atlnrittedlydisciplinaryaction has been initiated ,)inrt tlrc'Pt'titionerin 2016 t'or lhr acts alkge.dly i1ri,,',i,,iriii tpr in 2008' rhirefore' on the basis.of the saidchaigeruemo,petitioner's case Jor promorton cannotbe refused to be considered'
Tlter efore, pending fur the r or dt rs' r e sp o,n de nts shat,oinsilau petitionii'scasc for promo,Iion . to f)anrrlrt Dirulo'rof 1ou'n and Counlry I'tanntnS' ,r,i[norittaking into considerationthe charge memo
issued hy the 7't respondent in G.O.Rt.No.640 Municipal Administration €t Urbnn Deuelopment (Vig ll) Department, dt.06.10.2016, along uith eligible persons".
further orders are required. This writ petition is of the year
petitioner that the matter may be listed under"Infructuous", and the matter listed as such, this Court is not inclined to
keep the matter any further.
IS 5. The writ petition accordingly dismissed as
in-fructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if
any, shall stand closed
SD/.N. SRIHARI AS ST NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
CTION OFFICER
To,
TJ GJP(t-
HIGH COURT
DATED:2710212025
<br>I
ORDER
WP.No.25098 of 2017
;:=q;;i.<br>( ,J.
.
o (
(.
C)
t 1 0 JUL 2025
.,c)
*
ol.rc
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
C .dd
Y4r
20t
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B. Trzladhavi W/o. E Dhaneshwar
The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, MA and UD Department
The Director of Town and Country Planning, Telangana State, Hyderabad
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
