Dismissed¶43

Sanivarapu Gangadhar Reddy, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Sept 2025WP/27869/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Infructuous writ petition; acquittal of accused 1-9 on 08.07.2024; Crime No. 15/2016, CID Police Station Hyderabad; CC No. 693 of 2017, VIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Hyderabad; alleged police coercion to release monies to defacto complainant (Respondent 6); sections 420, 406, 463 r/w 34 IPC; Article 21; Article 226; writ of mandamus; Article 151 CPC petition; Telangana High Court; Justice N. Tukaramji; decided 19-09-2025; dismissed without costs.

What did the court decide?

None; writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, stood closed. ¶43

Sanivarapu Gangadhar Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana — Cheating and Forgery | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

13217 |

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEA/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 27869 OF 201 6

¶8

Between:

¶9

Sanivarapu Gjrngadhar Reddy, S/o. Late Narayana Reddy, Aged about 43 fears,^{Occ: Quartz l/iningBusiness,R/o. pl6t No.237,- K.plVenkatreddy} Colony, Near Nandyal Check Post, Kurnool, Andhra pradesh.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

2 The Director General of Police, Lakdikapul Road, Opposite Ravindra Bharathi, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad, Telangana.

¶14

3 The_lnspector General of Police, Crime lnvestigation Department, 3RD Floor, DGP Office, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad, Telangana.

¶15

4 The Deputy Superintendent of Police, CID Police Station, Near fVlahaveer Hospital, [/asab Tank, Hyderabad, Telangana.

¶16

The Station House Officer, CID Police Station, Near N/ahaveer Hospital, Iv'lasab Tank, Hyderabad, Telangana.

¶17

6 [.^{D.qqgdal Reddy, S/o: KCS Reddy,Aged about 38 years, Occ: Business,} Rr/o H. No. B-2-2g3tB2lBlS6, Road Nb. 10/C, Jubitee Hiils, Fiyderabad.

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 herein, in seeking to coerce the petitioner into releasing the monies to the 6th respondent, which form the subject matter pertaining to crime No. 15/20'16 on the file of clD police Station, Hyderabad Telangana, registered under sections 420, 406 and 463 rlw. 34 of lPC, as arbitrary, illegal, violative of Article 2'1 of the constitution of lndia as

¶20

arbitrary, illegal, offending^{Article21 of the Constitutionwittrr further directionto} the respondents no. 3 to^{5 not to interfere with the life and lil erty of the petitioner} and his family members^{in the guise of investigationinto the s rid crime'}

¶21

l.A. NO: 1 OF²⁰¹ 6(WPMP.^{NO: 34521 OF 2016)}

¶22

Petition under Section^{151 CPC praying that in the cir} umstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the HighCourt mit} be pleased to direct the respondents not to^{interferewith the day{o-dayactir} y and the peaceful possession and enioyment of the^properties of the^petit )ner and his family members with a further^{direction to the respondentNo. 3} ) remove the^police constables from the house of^{the petitioher and returnthe sz} d original document, bearing no 583212014 of the^{petitioner's house propertyi} : Plot No.237, K.P. Venkatreddy Colony, Near^{Nandyal CheckPost, Kurnool,Art'} hra Pradesh and the original document, document^{bearing no. 533812014, of a </sup> rcant plot owned by the petitioner and his^{family i.e Plot No.'197,K.P. Venka} reddy Colony, Near Nandyal Check Post, Kurnool,^{Andhra Pradesh} ,^inclul rg the original link documents of the^plot and the^house.}

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRIASHOK RAM V(NONEAPFI ARED)}

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent^{Nos.1 to 5: SRI R. LAXMIKAII'H REDDY,} GP FOR HOME

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.6: ----}

¶26

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶27

THE HONOURABI-E SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

¶28

WRIT PETITION No.27869 OF 2016

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

This Vrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following reliefls:-

¶31

"... to issue a^q.,rit order or direction one in the natr.ue of writ of mandams declaring the action of the Respon&nt Nos. J to 5 herein, in seeking to coerce the petitioner imo releasing the monies to the 6rh respondent, *'hich form the subjea maner penaining to C-rime No. 1512016 on the file of QD Police Stariorl Hyderabad Telangana, regisrered under sections 420, 406 arnp 463 rw. 3a of IPC, as arbitnry, illegal violative of Article 2l of rhe Corxdnnion of India as arbitr:ry, illegal, offending Anicle 2l of the Constirurion wfth a funher direction to the respondens no. J to 5 not to imerfere with the life and liberry of the petitioner and ht family nrmbea in the guise of investigation into the sard crirrr and Pass^"

¶32

None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

¶33

3 I have heard Mr.Rlaxmikanth Reddy, leamed Assistant

¶34

Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos. 1to5.

¶35

4- Learned fusistant Government Pleader for Home v/ould

¶36

submit that, Crime No.15 of 2016 was subsequently registered as CCNo.693 of 20t7 on rhe file of VIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hlderabad. Later after trial, the marter

¶37

was ended in acquinal on08.07.2024 agairst accused Nos.L to 9,

¶38

¶39

therefore, nothing further s urvlves ln thi; petition for

¶40

consideration.

¶41

I have perused the materials on record.

¶42

The petitioner's contention is that the res rcndent police authorities are pressurizing the petitioner for reL: sing money to the respondentNo.6-defacto complainart in punuar ce of the crime proceedings

¶43

Flaving regard to the development tmnspir ,d, and as the crime itself had ended in acquittal, and also due tr lapse of time, this Court finds no further aspect for consideratior in this maner. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as inlr rctuous. There shall be no order as to cosrs.

¶44

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall r; rnd closed. SD/. AH MI D^ABDULLAKHAN siI. ,TII.IT REGISTRAR

¶45

_/--

¶46

//TRUE COPY// '^{SECTION OFFICER}

¶47

To,

¶48